Cargando…

Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels

BACKGROUND: Genotype imputation is commonly used as an initial step in genomic selection since the accuracy of genomic selection does not decline if accurately imputed genotypes are used instead of actual genotypes but for a lower cost. Performance of imputation has rarely been investigated in cross...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Tao, Ma, Peipei, Ostersen, Tage, Legarra, Andres, Christensen, Ole F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4
_version_ 1782378915888627712
author Xiang, Tao
Ma, Peipei
Ostersen, Tage
Legarra, Andres
Christensen, Ole F
author_facet Xiang, Tao
Ma, Peipei
Ostersen, Tage
Legarra, Andres
Christensen, Ole F
author_sort Xiang, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genotype imputation is commonly used as an initial step in genomic selection since the accuracy of genomic selection does not decline if accurately imputed genotypes are used instead of actual genotypes but for a lower cost. Performance of imputation has rarely been investigated in crossbred animals and, in particular, in pigs. The extent and pattern of linkage disequilibrium differ in crossbred versus purebred animals, which may impact the performance of imputation. In this study, first we compared different scenarios of imputation from 5 K to 8 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genotyped Danish Landrace and Yorkshire and crossbred Landrace-Yorkshire datasets and, second, we compared imputation from 8 K to 60 K SNPs in genotyped purebred and simulated crossbred datasets. All imputations were done using software Beagle version 3.3.2. Then, we investigated the reasons that could explain the differences observed. RESULTS: Genotype imputation performs as well in crossbred animals as in purebred animals when both parental breeds are included in the reference population. When the size of the reference population is very large, it is not necessary to use a reference population that combines the two breeds to impute the genotypes of purebred animals because a within-breed reference population can provide a very high level of imputation accuracy (correct rate ≥ 0.99, correlation ≥ 0.95). However, to ensure that similar imputation accuracies are obtained for crossbred animals, a reference population that combines both parental purebred animals is required. Imputation accuracies are higher when a larger proportion of haplotypes are shared between the reference population and the validation (imputed) populations. CONCLUSIONS: The results from both real data and pedigree-based simulated data demonstrate that genotype imputation from low-density panels to medium-density panels is highly accurate in both purebred and crossbred pigs. In crossbred pigs, combining the parental purebred animals in the reference population is necessary to obtain high imputation accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4486706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44867062015-07-02 Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels Xiang, Tao Ma, Peipei Ostersen, Tage Legarra, Andres Christensen, Ole F Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genotype imputation is commonly used as an initial step in genomic selection since the accuracy of genomic selection does not decline if accurately imputed genotypes are used instead of actual genotypes but for a lower cost. Performance of imputation has rarely been investigated in crossbred animals and, in particular, in pigs. The extent and pattern of linkage disequilibrium differ in crossbred versus purebred animals, which may impact the performance of imputation. In this study, first we compared different scenarios of imputation from 5 K to 8 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genotyped Danish Landrace and Yorkshire and crossbred Landrace-Yorkshire datasets and, second, we compared imputation from 8 K to 60 K SNPs in genotyped purebred and simulated crossbred datasets. All imputations were done using software Beagle version 3.3.2. Then, we investigated the reasons that could explain the differences observed. RESULTS: Genotype imputation performs as well in crossbred animals as in purebred animals when both parental breeds are included in the reference population. When the size of the reference population is very large, it is not necessary to use a reference population that combines the two breeds to impute the genotypes of purebred animals because a within-breed reference population can provide a very high level of imputation accuracy (correct rate ≥ 0.99, correlation ≥ 0.95). However, to ensure that similar imputation accuracies are obtained for crossbred animals, a reference population that combines both parental purebred animals is required. Imputation accuracies are higher when a larger proportion of haplotypes are shared between the reference population and the validation (imputed) populations. CONCLUSIONS: The results from both real data and pedigree-based simulated data demonstrate that genotype imputation from low-density panels to medium-density panels is highly accurate in both purebred and crossbred pigs. In crossbred pigs, combining the parental purebred animals in the reference population is necessary to obtain high imputation accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4486706/ /pubmed/26122927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4 Text en © Xiang et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiang, Tao
Ma, Peipei
Ostersen, Tage
Legarra, Andres
Christensen, Ole F
Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title_full Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title_fullStr Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title_full_unstemmed Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title_short Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
title_sort imputation of genotypes in danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0134-4
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangtao imputationofgenotypesindanishpurebredandtwowaycrossbredpigsusinglowdensitypanels
AT mapeipei imputationofgenotypesindanishpurebredandtwowaycrossbredpigsusinglowdensitypanels
AT ostersentage imputationofgenotypesindanishpurebredandtwowaycrossbredpigsusinglowdensitypanels
AT legarraandres imputationofgenotypesindanishpurebredandtwowaycrossbredpigsusinglowdensitypanels
AT christensenolef imputationofgenotypesindanishpurebredandtwowaycrossbredpigsusinglowdensitypanels