Cargando…
A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate rep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056 |
_version_ | 1782378918194446336 |
---|---|
author | Hägi, Tobias T. Klemensberger, Sabrina Bereiter, Riccarda Nietzsche, Sandor Cosgarea, Raluca Flury, Simon Lussi, Adrian Sculean, Anton Eick, Sigrun |
author_facet | Hägi, Tobias T. Klemensberger, Sabrina Bereiter, Riccarda Nietzsche, Sandor Cosgarea, Raluca Flury, Simon Lussi, Adrian Sculean, Anton Eick, Sigrun |
author_sort | Hägi, Tobias T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD. RESULTS: After 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: The established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4486723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44867232015-07-02 A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts Hägi, Tobias T. Klemensberger, Sabrina Bereiter, Riccarda Nietzsche, Sandor Cosgarea, Raluca Flury, Simon Lussi, Adrian Sculean, Anton Eick, Sigrun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD. RESULTS: After 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: The established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts. Public Library of Science 2015-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4486723/ /pubmed/26121365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056 Text en © 2015 Hägi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hägi, Tobias T. Klemensberger, Sabrina Bereiter, Riccarda Nietzsche, Sandor Cosgarea, Raluca Flury, Simon Lussi, Adrian Sculean, Anton Eick, Sigrun A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title | A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title_full | A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title_fullStr | A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title_full_unstemmed | A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title_short | A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts |
title_sort | biofilm pocket model to evaluate different non-surgical periodontal treatment modalities in terms of biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations and attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagitobiast abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT klemensbergersabrina abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT bereiterriccarda abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT nietzschesandor abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT cosgarearaluca abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT flurysimon abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT lussiadrian abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT sculeananton abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT eicksigrun abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT hagitobiast biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT klemensbergersabrina biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT bereiterriccarda biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT nietzschesandor biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT cosgarearaluca biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT flurysimon biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT lussiadrian biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT sculeananton biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts AT eicksigrun biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts |