Cargando…

A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hägi, Tobias T., Klemensberger, Sabrina, Bereiter, Riccarda, Nietzsche, Sandor, Cosgarea, Raluca, Flury, Simon, Lussi, Adrian, Sculean, Anton, Eick, Sigrun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056
_version_ 1782378918194446336
author Hägi, Tobias T.
Klemensberger, Sabrina
Bereiter, Riccarda
Nietzsche, Sandor
Cosgarea, Raluca
Flury, Simon
Lussi, Adrian
Sculean, Anton
Eick, Sigrun
author_facet Hägi, Tobias T.
Klemensberger, Sabrina
Bereiter, Riccarda
Nietzsche, Sandor
Cosgarea, Raluca
Flury, Simon
Lussi, Adrian
Sculean, Anton
Eick, Sigrun
author_sort Hägi, Tobias T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD. RESULTS: After 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: The established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4486723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44867232015-07-02 A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts Hägi, Tobias T. Klemensberger, Sabrina Bereiter, Riccarda Nietzsche, Sandor Cosgarea, Raluca Flury, Simon Lussi, Adrian Sculean, Anton Eick, Sigrun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD. RESULTS: After 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts. CONCLUSION: The established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts. Public Library of Science 2015-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4486723/ /pubmed/26121365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056 Text en © 2015 Hägi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hägi, Tobias T.
Klemensberger, Sabrina
Bereiter, Riccarda
Nietzsche, Sandor
Cosgarea, Raluca
Flury, Simon
Lussi, Adrian
Sculean, Anton
Eick, Sigrun
A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title_full A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title_fullStr A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title_full_unstemmed A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title_short A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts
title_sort biofilm pocket model to evaluate different non-surgical periodontal treatment modalities in terms of biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations and attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131056
work_keys_str_mv AT hagitobiast abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT klemensbergersabrina abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT bereiterriccarda abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT nietzschesandor abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT cosgarearaluca abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT flurysimon abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT lussiadrian abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT sculeananton abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT eicksigrun abiofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT hagitobiast biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT klemensbergersabrina biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT bereiterriccarda biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT nietzschesandor biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT cosgarearaluca biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT flurysimon biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT lussiadrian biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT sculeananton biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts
AT eicksigrun biofilmpocketmodeltoevaluatedifferentnonsurgicalperiodontaltreatmentmodalitiesintermsofbiofilmremovalandreformationsurfacealterationsandattachmentofperiodontalligamentfibroblasts