Cargando…

Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs

BACKGROUND: Genome editing (GE) is a method that enables specific nucleotides in the genome of an individual to be changed. To date, use of GE in livestock has focussed on simple traits that are controlled by a few quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) with large effects. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenko, Janez, Gorjanc, Gregor, Cleveland, Matthew A, Varshney, Rajeev K, Whitelaw, C. Bruce A, Woolliams, John A, Hickey, John M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0135-3
_version_ 1782379028155465728
author Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
Cleveland, Matthew A
Varshney, Rajeev K
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A
Woolliams, John A
Hickey, John M
author_facet Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
Cleveland, Matthew A
Varshney, Rajeev K
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A
Woolliams, John A
Hickey, John M
author_sort Jenko, Janez
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome editing (GE) is a method that enables specific nucleotides in the genome of an individual to be changed. To date, use of GE in livestock has focussed on simple traits that are controlled by a few quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) with large effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of GE to improve quantitative traits that are controlled by many QTN, referred to here as promotion of alleles by genome editing (PAGE). METHODS: Multiple scenarios were simulated to test alternative PAGE strategies for a quantitative trait. They differed in (i) the number of edits per sire (0 to 100), (ii) the number of edits per generation (0 to 500), and (iii) the extent of use of PAGE (i.e. editing all sires or only a proportion of them). The base line scenario involved selecting individuals on true breeding values (i.e., genomic selection only (GS only)-genomic selection with perfect accuracy) for several generations. Alternative scenarios complemented this base line scenario with PAGE (GS + PAGE). The effect of different PAGE strategies was quantified by comparing response to selection, changes in allele frequencies, the number of distinct QTN edited, the sum of absolute effects of the edited QTN per generation, and inbreeding. RESULTS: Response to selection after 20 generations was between 1.08 and 4.12 times higher with GS + PAGE than with GS only. Increases in response to selection were larger with more edits per sire and more sires edited. When the total resources for PAGE were limited, editing a few sires for many QTN resulted in greater response to selection and inbreeding compared to editing many sires for a few QTN. Between the scenarios GS only and GS + PAGE, there was little difference in the average change in QTN allele frequencies, but there was a major difference for the QTN with the largest effects. The sum of the effects of the edited QTN decreased across generations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PAGE has great potential for application in livestock breeding programs, but inbreeding needs to be managed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0135-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4487592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44875922015-07-02 Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs Jenko, Janez Gorjanc, Gregor Cleveland, Matthew A Varshney, Rajeev K Whitelaw, C. Bruce A Woolliams, John A Hickey, John M Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genome editing (GE) is a method that enables specific nucleotides in the genome of an individual to be changed. To date, use of GE in livestock has focussed on simple traits that are controlled by a few quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) with large effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of GE to improve quantitative traits that are controlled by many QTN, referred to here as promotion of alleles by genome editing (PAGE). METHODS: Multiple scenarios were simulated to test alternative PAGE strategies for a quantitative trait. They differed in (i) the number of edits per sire (0 to 100), (ii) the number of edits per generation (0 to 500), and (iii) the extent of use of PAGE (i.e. editing all sires or only a proportion of them). The base line scenario involved selecting individuals on true breeding values (i.e., genomic selection only (GS only)-genomic selection with perfect accuracy) for several generations. Alternative scenarios complemented this base line scenario with PAGE (GS + PAGE). The effect of different PAGE strategies was quantified by comparing response to selection, changes in allele frequencies, the number of distinct QTN edited, the sum of absolute effects of the edited QTN per generation, and inbreeding. RESULTS: Response to selection after 20 generations was between 1.08 and 4.12 times higher with GS + PAGE than with GS only. Increases in response to selection were larger with more edits per sire and more sires edited. When the total resources for PAGE were limited, editing a few sires for many QTN resulted in greater response to selection and inbreeding compared to editing many sires for a few QTN. Between the scenarios GS only and GS + PAGE, there was little difference in the average change in QTN allele frequencies, but there was a major difference for the QTN with the largest effects. The sum of the effects of the edited QTN decreased across generations. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PAGE has great potential for application in livestock breeding programs, but inbreeding needs to be managed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0135-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4487592/ /pubmed/26133579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0135-3 Text en © Jenko et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jenko, Janez
Gorjanc, Gregor
Cleveland, Matthew A
Varshney, Rajeev K
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A
Woolliams, John A
Hickey, John M
Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title_full Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title_fullStr Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title_full_unstemmed Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title_short Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
title_sort potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0135-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkojanez potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT gorjancgregor potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT clevelandmatthewa potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT varshneyrajeevk potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT whitelawcbrucea potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT woolliamsjohna potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms
AT hickeyjohnm potentialofpromotionofallelesbygenomeeditingtoimprovequantitativetraitsinlivestockbreedingprograms