Cargando…
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typicall...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 |
_version_ | 1782379030010396672 |
---|---|
author | Genheden, Samuel Ryde, Ulf |
author_facet | Genheden, Samuel Ryde, Ulf |
author_sort | Genheden, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4487606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44876062015-08-03 The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities Genheden, Samuel Ryde, Ulf Expert Opin Drug Discov Review Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results. Informa Healthcare 2015-05-04 2015-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4487606/ /pubmed/25835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 Text en © Informa UK, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Genheden, Samuel Ryde, Ulf The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title | The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title_full | The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title_fullStr | The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title_full_unstemmed | The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title_short | The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
title_sort | mm/pbsa and mm/gbsa methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT genhedensamuel themmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities AT rydeulf themmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities AT genhedensamuel mmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities AT rydeulf mmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities |