Cargando…

The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities

Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Genheden, Samuel, Ryde, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25835573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
_version_ 1782379030010396672
author Genheden, Samuel
Ryde, Ulf
author_facet Genheden, Samuel
Ryde, Ulf
author_sort Genheden, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4487606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44876062015-08-03 The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities Genheden, Samuel Ryde, Ulf Expert Opin Drug Discov Review Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results. Informa Healthcare 2015-05-04 2015-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4487606/ /pubmed/25835573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 Text en © Informa UK, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited.
spellingShingle Review
Genheden, Samuel
Ryde, Ulf
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title_full The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title_fullStr The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title_full_unstemmed The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title_short The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
title_sort mm/pbsa and mm/gbsa methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25835573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
work_keys_str_mv AT genhedensamuel themmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities
AT rydeulf themmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities
AT genhedensamuel mmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities
AT rydeulf mmpbsaandmmgbsamethodstoestimateligandbindingaffinities