Cargando…
Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015 |
_version_ | 1782379039813533696 |
---|---|
author | Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Jochumsen, Mads Niazi, Imran Khan Dremstrup, Kim |
author_facet | Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Jochumsen, Mads Niazi, Imran Khan Dremstrup, Kim |
author_sort | Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain features to detect movement intention from EEG signals prior to movement execution. Data were recoded from 24 able-bodied subjects, 12 performing real movements, and 12 performing imaginary movements. Furthermore, six stroke patients with lower limb paresis were included. Temporal and spectral features were investigated in combination with linear discriminant analysis and compared with template matching. The results showed that spectral features were best suited for differentiating between movement intention and noise across different tasks. The ensemble average across tasks when using spectral features was (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%, sensitivity = 97.2 ± 0.9%, and specificity = 97 ± 1%) significantly better (P < 0.01) than temporal features (error = 15 ± 1.4%, sensitivity: 85 ± 1.3%, and specificity: 84 ± 2%). The proposed approach also (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%) outperformed template matching (error = 26.9 ± 2.3%) significantly (P > 0.001). Results imply that frequency information is important for detecting movement intention, which is promising for the application of this approach to provide patient-driven real-time neurofeedback. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4487719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44877192015-07-09 Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Jochumsen, Mads Niazi, Imran Khan Dremstrup, Kim Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain features to detect movement intention from EEG signals prior to movement execution. Data were recoded from 24 able-bodied subjects, 12 performing real movements, and 12 performing imaginary movements. Furthermore, six stroke patients with lower limb paresis were included. Temporal and spectral features were investigated in combination with linear discriminant analysis and compared with template matching. The results showed that spectral features were best suited for differentiating between movement intention and noise across different tasks. The ensemble average across tasks when using spectral features was (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%, sensitivity = 97.2 ± 0.9%, and specificity = 97 ± 1%) significantly better (P < 0.01) than temporal features (error = 15 ± 1.4%, sensitivity: 85 ± 1.3%, and specificity: 84 ± 2%). The proposed approach also (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%) outperformed template matching (error = 26.9 ± 2.3%) significantly (P > 0.001). Results imply that frequency information is important for detecting movement intention, which is promising for the application of this approach to provide patient-driven real-time neurofeedback. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4487719/ /pubmed/26161089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Jochumsen, Mads Niazi, Imran Khan Dremstrup, Kim Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title | Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title_full | Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title_short | Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients |
title_sort | comparison of features for movement prediction from single-trial movement-related cortical potentials in healthy subjects and stroke patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamavuakoernestnlandu comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients AT jochumsenmads comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients AT niaziimrankhan comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients AT dremstrupkim comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients |