Cargando…

Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients

Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu, Jochumsen, Mads, Niazi, Imran Khan, Dremstrup, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015
_version_ 1782379039813533696
author Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Jochumsen, Mads
Niazi, Imran Khan
Dremstrup, Kim
author_facet Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Jochumsen, Mads
Niazi, Imran Khan
Dremstrup, Kim
author_sort Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
collection PubMed
description Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain features to detect movement intention from EEG signals prior to movement execution. Data were recoded from 24 able-bodied subjects, 12 performing real movements, and 12 performing imaginary movements. Furthermore, six stroke patients with lower limb paresis were included. Temporal and spectral features were investigated in combination with linear discriminant analysis and compared with template matching. The results showed that spectral features were best suited for differentiating between movement intention and noise across different tasks. The ensemble average across tasks when using spectral features was (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%, sensitivity = 97.2 ± 0.9%, and specificity = 97 ± 1%) significantly better (P < 0.01) than temporal features (error = 15 ± 1.4%, sensitivity: 85 ± 1.3%, and specificity: 84 ± 2%). The proposed approach also (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%) outperformed template matching (error = 26.9 ± 2.3%) significantly (P > 0.001). Results imply that frequency information is important for detecting movement intention, which is promising for the application of this approach to provide patient-driven real-time neurofeedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4487719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44877192015-07-09 Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu Jochumsen, Mads Niazi, Imran Khan Dremstrup, Kim Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain features to detect movement intention from EEG signals prior to movement execution. Data were recoded from 24 able-bodied subjects, 12 performing real movements, and 12 performing imaginary movements. Furthermore, six stroke patients with lower limb paresis were included. Temporal and spectral features were investigated in combination with linear discriminant analysis and compared with template matching. The results showed that spectral features were best suited for differentiating between movement intention and noise across different tasks. The ensemble average across tasks when using spectral features was (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%, sensitivity = 97.2 ± 0.9%, and specificity = 97 ± 1%) significantly better (P < 0.01) than temporal features (error = 15 ± 1.4%, sensitivity: 85 ± 1.3%, and specificity: 84 ± 2%). The proposed approach also (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%) outperformed template matching (error = 26.9 ± 2.3%) significantly (P > 0.001). Results imply that frequency information is important for detecting movement intention, which is promising for the application of this approach to provide patient-driven real-time neurofeedback. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4487719/ /pubmed/26161089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
Jochumsen, Mads
Niazi, Imran Khan
Dremstrup, Kim
Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title_full Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title_short Comparison of Features for Movement Prediction from Single-Trial Movement-Related Cortical Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
title_sort comparison of features for movement prediction from single-trial movement-related cortical potentials in healthy subjects and stroke patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26161089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/858015
work_keys_str_mv AT kamavuakoernestnlandu comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients
AT jochumsenmads comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients
AT niaziimrankhan comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients
AT dremstrupkim comparisonoffeaturesformovementpredictionfromsingletrialmovementrelatedcorticalpotentialsinhealthysubjectsandstrokepatients