Cargando…

Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer in situ (BCIS) diagnoses, a precursor lesion for invasive breast cancer, comprise about 20 % of all breast cancers (BC) in countries with screening programs. Family history of BC is considered one of the strongest risk factors for BCIS. METHODS: To evaluate the associatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campa, Daniele, Barrdahl, Myrto, Gaudet, Mia M., Black, Amanda, Chanock, Stephen J., Diver, W. Ryan, Gapstur, Susan M., Haiman, Christopher, Hankinson, Susan, Hazra, Aditi, Henderson, Brian, Hoover, Robert N., Hunter, David J., Joshi, Amit D., Kraft, Peter, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindström, Sara, Willett, Walter, Travis, Ruth C., Amiano, Pilar, Siddiq, Afshan, Trichopoulos, Dimitrios, Sund, Malin, Tjønneland, Anne, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Peeters, Petra H., Panico, Salvatore, Dossus, Laure, Ziegler, Regina G., Canzian, Federico, Kaaks, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0596-x
_version_ 1782379066283786240
author Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Gaudet, Mia M.
Black, Amanda
Chanock, Stephen J.
Diver, W. Ryan
Gapstur, Susan M.
Haiman, Christopher
Hankinson, Susan
Hazra, Aditi
Henderson, Brian
Hoover, Robert N.
Hunter, David J.
Joshi, Amit D.
Kraft, Peter
Le Marchand, Loic
Lindström, Sara
Willett, Walter
Travis, Ruth C.
Amiano, Pilar
Siddiq, Afshan
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Sund, Malin
Tjønneland, Anne
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Peeters, Petra H.
Panico, Salvatore
Dossus, Laure
Ziegler, Regina G.
Canzian, Federico
Kaaks, Rudolf
author_facet Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Gaudet, Mia M.
Black, Amanda
Chanock, Stephen J.
Diver, W. Ryan
Gapstur, Susan M.
Haiman, Christopher
Hankinson, Susan
Hazra, Aditi
Henderson, Brian
Hoover, Robert N.
Hunter, David J.
Joshi, Amit D.
Kraft, Peter
Le Marchand, Loic
Lindström, Sara
Willett, Walter
Travis, Ruth C.
Amiano, Pilar
Siddiq, Afshan
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Sund, Malin
Tjønneland, Anne
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Peeters, Petra H.
Panico, Salvatore
Dossus, Laure
Ziegler, Regina G.
Canzian, Federico
Kaaks, Rudolf
author_sort Campa, Daniele
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer in situ (BCIS) diagnoses, a precursor lesion for invasive breast cancer, comprise about 20 % of all breast cancers (BC) in countries with screening programs. Family history of BC is considered one of the strongest risk factors for BCIS. METHODS: To evaluate the association of BC susceptibility loci with BCIS risk, we genotyped 39 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with risk of invasive BC, in 1317 BCIS cases, 10,645 invasive BC cases, and 14,006 healthy controls in the National Cancer Institute’s Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). Using unconditional logistic regression models adjusted for age and study, we estimated the association of SNPs with BCIS using two different comparison groups: healthy controls and invasive BC subjects to investigate whether BCIS and BC share a common genetic profile. RESULTS: We found that five SNPs (CDKN2BAS-rs1011970, FGFR2-rs3750817, FGFR2-rs2981582, TNRC9-rs3803662, 5p12-rs10941679) were significantly associated with BCIS risk (P value adjusted for multiple comparisons <0.0016). Comparing invasive BC and BCIS, the largest difference was for CDKN2BAS-rs1011970, which showed a positive association with BCIS (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.11–1.38, P = 1.27 x 10(−4)) and no association with invasive BC (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.99–1.07, P = 0.06), with a P value for case-case comparison of 0.006. Subgroup analyses investigating associations with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) found similar associations, albeit less significant (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.09–1.42, P = 1.07 x 10(−3)). Additional risk analyses showed significant associations with invasive disease at the 0.05 level for 28 of the alleles and the OR estimates were consistent with those reported by other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds to the knowledge that several of the known BC susceptibility loci are risk factors for both BCIS and invasive BC, with the possible exception of rs1011970, a putatively functional SNP situated in the CDKN2BAS gene that may be a specific BCIS susceptibility locus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0596-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4487950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44879502015-07-02 Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer Campa, Daniele Barrdahl, Myrto Gaudet, Mia M. Black, Amanda Chanock, Stephen J. Diver, W. Ryan Gapstur, Susan M. Haiman, Christopher Hankinson, Susan Hazra, Aditi Henderson, Brian Hoover, Robert N. Hunter, David J. Joshi, Amit D. Kraft, Peter Le Marchand, Loic Lindström, Sara Willett, Walter Travis, Ruth C. Amiano, Pilar Siddiq, Afshan Trichopoulos, Dimitrios Sund, Malin Tjønneland, Anne Weiderpass, Elisabete Peeters, Petra H. Panico, Salvatore Dossus, Laure Ziegler, Regina G. Canzian, Federico Kaaks, Rudolf Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer in situ (BCIS) diagnoses, a precursor lesion for invasive breast cancer, comprise about 20 % of all breast cancers (BC) in countries with screening programs. Family history of BC is considered one of the strongest risk factors for BCIS. METHODS: To evaluate the association of BC susceptibility loci with BCIS risk, we genotyped 39 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with risk of invasive BC, in 1317 BCIS cases, 10,645 invasive BC cases, and 14,006 healthy controls in the National Cancer Institute’s Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). Using unconditional logistic regression models adjusted for age and study, we estimated the association of SNPs with BCIS using two different comparison groups: healthy controls and invasive BC subjects to investigate whether BCIS and BC share a common genetic profile. RESULTS: We found that five SNPs (CDKN2BAS-rs1011970, FGFR2-rs3750817, FGFR2-rs2981582, TNRC9-rs3803662, 5p12-rs10941679) were significantly associated with BCIS risk (P value adjusted for multiple comparisons <0.0016). Comparing invasive BC and BCIS, the largest difference was for CDKN2BAS-rs1011970, which showed a positive association with BCIS (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.11–1.38, P = 1.27 x 10(−4)) and no association with invasive BC (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.99–1.07, P = 0.06), with a P value for case-case comparison of 0.006. Subgroup analyses investigating associations with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) found similar associations, albeit less significant (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.09–1.42, P = 1.07 x 10(−3)). Additional risk analyses showed significant associations with invasive disease at the 0.05 level for 28 of the alleles and the OR estimates were consistent with those reported by other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds to the knowledge that several of the known BC susceptibility loci are risk factors for both BCIS and invasive BC, with the possible exception of rs1011970, a putatively functional SNP situated in the CDKN2BAS gene that may be a specific BCIS susceptibility locus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0596-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4487950/ /pubmed/26070784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0596-x Text en © Campa et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Gaudet, Mia M.
Black, Amanda
Chanock, Stephen J.
Diver, W. Ryan
Gapstur, Susan M.
Haiman, Christopher
Hankinson, Susan
Hazra, Aditi
Henderson, Brian
Hoover, Robert N.
Hunter, David J.
Joshi, Amit D.
Kraft, Peter
Le Marchand, Loic
Lindström, Sara
Willett, Walter
Travis, Ruth C.
Amiano, Pilar
Siddiq, Afshan
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Sund, Malin
Tjønneland, Anne
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Peeters, Petra H.
Panico, Salvatore
Dossus, Laure
Ziegler, Regina G.
Canzian, Federico
Kaaks, Rudolf
Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title_full Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title_fullStr Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title_short Genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
title_sort genetic risk variants associated with in situ breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26070784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0596-x
work_keys_str_mv AT campadaniele geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT barrdahlmyrto geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT gaudetmiam geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT blackamanda geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT chanockstephenj geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT diverwryan geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT gapstursusanm geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT haimanchristopher geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT hankinsonsusan geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT hazraaditi geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT hendersonbrian geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT hooverrobertn geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT hunterdavidj geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT joshiamitd geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT kraftpeter geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT lemarchandloic geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT lindstromsara geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT willettwalter geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT travisruthc geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT amianopilar geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT siddiqafshan geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT trichopoulosdimitrios geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT sundmalin geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT tjønnelandanne geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT weiderpasselisabete geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT peeterspetrah geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT panicosalvatore geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT dossuslaure geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT zieglerreginag geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT canzianfederico geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer
AT kaaksrudolf geneticriskvariantsassociatedwithinsitubreastcancer