Cargando…

Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering

BACKGROUND: Chromosome engineering encompasses a collection of homologous recombination-based techniques that are employed to modify the genome of a model organism in a controlled fashion. Such techniques are widely used in both fundamental and industrial research to introduce multiple insertions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram, Moolman, M. Charl, van Laar, Theo, Meyer, Anne S., Dekker, Nynke H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0008-x
_version_ 1782379082256744448
author Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Moolman, M. Charl
van Laar, Theo
Meyer, Anne S.
Dekker, Nynke H.
author_facet Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Moolman, M. Charl
van Laar, Theo
Meyer, Anne S.
Dekker, Nynke H.
author_sort Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chromosome engineering encompasses a collection of homologous recombination-based techniques that are employed to modify the genome of a model organism in a controlled fashion. Such techniques are widely used in both fundamental and industrial research to introduce multiple insertions in the same Escherichia coli strain. To date, λ-Red recombination (also known as recombineering) and P1 phage transduction are the most successfully implemented chromosome engineering techniques in E. coli. However, due to errors that can occur during the strain creation process, reliable validation methods are essential upon alteration of a strain’s chromosome. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and DNA sequence analysis are rapid and powerful methods to verify successful integration of DNA sequences into a chromosome. Even though these verification methods are necessary, they may not be sufficient in detecting all errors, imposing the requirement of additional validation methods. For example, as extraneous insertions may occur during recombineering, we highlight the use of Southern blotting to detect their presence. These unwanted mutations can be removed via transducing the region of interest into the wild type chromosome using P1 phages. However, in doing so one must verify that both the P1 lysate and the strains utilized are free from contamination with temperate phages, as these can lysogenize inside a cell as a large plasmid. Thus, we illustrate various methods to probe for temperate phage contamination, including cross-streak agar and Evans Blue-Uranine (EBU) plate assays, whereby the latter is a newly reported technique for this purpose in E. coli. Lastly, we discuss methodologies for detecting defects in cell growth and shape characteristics, which should be employed as an additional check. CONCLUSION: The simple, yet crucial validation techniques discussed here can be used to reliably verify any chromosomally engineered E. coli strains for errors such as non-specific insertions in the chromosome, temperate phage contamination, and defects in growth and cell shape. While techniques such as PCR and DNA sequence verification should standardly be performed, we illustrate the necessity of performing these additional assays. The discussed techniques are highly generic and can be easily applied to any type of chromosome engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44880412015-07-03 Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram Moolman, M. Charl van Laar, Theo Meyer, Anne S. Dekker, Nynke H. J Biol Eng Methodology BACKGROUND: Chromosome engineering encompasses a collection of homologous recombination-based techniques that are employed to modify the genome of a model organism in a controlled fashion. Such techniques are widely used in both fundamental and industrial research to introduce multiple insertions in the same Escherichia coli strain. To date, λ-Red recombination (also known as recombineering) and P1 phage transduction are the most successfully implemented chromosome engineering techniques in E. coli. However, due to errors that can occur during the strain creation process, reliable validation methods are essential upon alteration of a strain’s chromosome. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and DNA sequence analysis are rapid and powerful methods to verify successful integration of DNA sequences into a chromosome. Even though these verification methods are necessary, they may not be sufficient in detecting all errors, imposing the requirement of additional validation methods. For example, as extraneous insertions may occur during recombineering, we highlight the use of Southern blotting to detect their presence. These unwanted mutations can be removed via transducing the region of interest into the wild type chromosome using P1 phages. However, in doing so one must verify that both the P1 lysate and the strains utilized are free from contamination with temperate phages, as these can lysogenize inside a cell as a large plasmid. Thus, we illustrate various methods to probe for temperate phage contamination, including cross-streak agar and Evans Blue-Uranine (EBU) plate assays, whereby the latter is a newly reported technique for this purpose in E. coli. Lastly, we discuss methodologies for detecting defects in cell growth and shape characteristics, which should be employed as an additional check. CONCLUSION: The simple, yet crucial validation techniques discussed here can be used to reliably verify any chromosomally engineered E. coli strains for errors such as non-specific insertions in the chromosome, temperate phage contamination, and defects in growth and cell shape. While techniques such as PCR and DNA sequence verification should standardly be performed, we illustrate the necessity of performing these additional assays. The discussed techniques are highly generic and can be easily applied to any type of chromosome engineering. BioMed Central 2015-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4488041/ /pubmed/26140052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0008-x Text en © Tiruvadi Krishnan et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Moolman, M. Charl
van Laar, Theo
Meyer, Anne S.
Dekker, Nynke H.
Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title_full Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title_fullStr Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title_full_unstemmed Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title_short Essential validation methods for E. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
title_sort essential validation methods for e. coli strains created by chromosome engineering
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0008-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tiruvadikrishnansriram essentialvalidationmethodsforecolistrainscreatedbychromosomeengineering
AT moolmanmcharl essentialvalidationmethodsforecolistrainscreatedbychromosomeengineering
AT vanlaartheo essentialvalidationmethodsforecolistrainscreatedbychromosomeengineering
AT meyerannes essentialvalidationmethodsforecolistrainscreatedbychromosomeengineering
AT dekkernynkeh essentialvalidationmethodsforecolistrainscreatedbychromosomeengineering