Cargando…

Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: In recent years, interventions and health policy programmes have been established to promote patient empowerment, with a particular focus on patients affected by long-term conditions. However, a clear definition of patient empowerment is lacking, making it difficult to assess effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bravo, Paulina, Edwards, Adrian, Barr, Paul James, Scholl, Isabelle, Elwyn, Glyn, McAllister, Marion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26126998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z
_version_ 1782379098373357568
author Bravo, Paulina
Edwards, Adrian
Barr, Paul James
Scholl, Isabelle
Elwyn, Glyn
McAllister, Marion
author_facet Bravo, Paulina
Edwards, Adrian
Barr, Paul James
Scholl, Isabelle
Elwyn, Glyn
McAllister, Marion
author_sort Bravo, Paulina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, interventions and health policy programmes have been established to promote patient empowerment, with a particular focus on patients affected by long-term conditions. However, a clear definition of patient empowerment is lacking, making it difficult to assess effectiveness of interventions designed to promote it. The aim in this study was to develop a conceptual map of patient empowerment, including components of patient empowerment and relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted comprising (i) a scoping literature review to identify and map the components underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment (ii) qualitative interviews with key stakeholders (patients, patient representatives, health managers and health service researchers) to further develop the conceptual map. Data were analysed using qualitative methods. A combination of thematic and framework analysis was used to integrate and map themes underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment with the views of key UK stakeholders. RESULTS: The scoping literature review identified 67 articles that included a definition of patient empowerment. A range of diverse definitions of patient empowerment was extracted. Thematic analysis identified key underpinning themes, and these themes were used to develop an initial coding framework for analysis of interview data. 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders. Transcripts were analysed using the initial coding framework, and findings were used to further develop the conceptual map. The resulting conceptual map describes that patient empowerment can be conceived as a state ranging across a spectrum from low to high levels of patient empowerment, with the level of patient empowerment potentially measurable using a set of indicators. Five key components of the conceptual map were identified: underpinning ethos, moderators, interventions, indicators and outcomes. Relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making are illustrated in the conceptual map. CONCLUSION: A novel conceptual map of patient empowerment grounded in published definitions of patient empowerment and qualitative interviews with UK stakeholders is described, that may be useful to healthcare providers and researchers designing, implementing and evaluating interventions to promote patient empowerment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44881132015-07-03 Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study Bravo, Paulina Edwards, Adrian Barr, Paul James Scholl, Isabelle Elwyn, Glyn McAllister, Marion BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, interventions and health policy programmes have been established to promote patient empowerment, with a particular focus on patients affected by long-term conditions. However, a clear definition of patient empowerment is lacking, making it difficult to assess effectiveness of interventions designed to promote it. The aim in this study was to develop a conceptual map of patient empowerment, including components of patient empowerment and relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted comprising (i) a scoping literature review to identify and map the components underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment (ii) qualitative interviews with key stakeholders (patients, patient representatives, health managers and health service researchers) to further develop the conceptual map. Data were analysed using qualitative methods. A combination of thematic and framework analysis was used to integrate and map themes underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment with the views of key UK stakeholders. RESULTS: The scoping literature review identified 67 articles that included a definition of patient empowerment. A range of diverse definitions of patient empowerment was extracted. Thematic analysis identified key underpinning themes, and these themes were used to develop an initial coding framework for analysis of interview data. 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders. Transcripts were analysed using the initial coding framework, and findings were used to further develop the conceptual map. The resulting conceptual map describes that patient empowerment can be conceived as a state ranging across a spectrum from low to high levels of patient empowerment, with the level of patient empowerment potentially measurable using a set of indicators. Five key components of the conceptual map were identified: underpinning ethos, moderators, interventions, indicators and outcomes. Relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making are illustrated in the conceptual map. CONCLUSION: A novel conceptual map of patient empowerment grounded in published definitions of patient empowerment and qualitative interviews with UK stakeholders is described, that may be useful to healthcare providers and researchers designing, implementing and evaluating interventions to promote patient empowerment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4488113/ /pubmed/26126998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z Text en © Bravo et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bravo, Paulina
Edwards, Adrian
Barr, Paul James
Scholl, Isabelle
Elwyn, Glyn
McAllister, Marion
Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title_full Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title_short Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
title_sort conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26126998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bravopaulina conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT edwardsadrian conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT barrpauljames conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT schollisabelle conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT elwynglyn conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT mcallistermarion conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy
AT conceptualisingpatientempowermentamixedmethodsstudy