Cargando…

Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System

Physical systems with time-varying internal couplings are abundant in nature. While the full governing equations of these systems are typically unknown due to insufficient understanding of their internal mechanisms, there is often interest in determining the leading element. Here, the leading elemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BozorgMagham, Amir E., Motesharrei, Safa, Penny, Stephen G., Kalnay, Eugenia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131226
_version_ 1782379139362193408
author BozorgMagham, Amir E.
Motesharrei, Safa
Penny, Stephen G.
Kalnay, Eugenia
author_facet BozorgMagham, Amir E.
Motesharrei, Safa
Penny, Stephen G.
Kalnay, Eugenia
author_sort BozorgMagham, Amir E.
collection PubMed
description Physical systems with time-varying internal couplings are abundant in nature. While the full governing equations of these systems are typically unknown due to insufficient understanding of their internal mechanisms, there is often interest in determining the leading element. Here, the leading element is defined as the sub-system with the largest coupling coefficient averaged over a selected time span. Previously, the Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) method has been employed to determine causality and dominant component in weakly coupled systems with constant coupling coefficients. In this study, CCM is applied to a pair of coupled Lorenz systems with time-varying coupling coefficients, exhibiting switching between dominant sub-systems in different periods. Four sets of numerical experiments are carried out. The first three cases consist of different coupling coefficient schemes: I) Periodic–constant, II) Normal, and III) Mixed Normal/Non-normal. In case IV, numerical experiment of cases II and III are repeated with imposed temporal uncertainties as well as additive normal noise. Our results show that, through detecting directional interactions, CCM identifies the leading sub-system in all cases except when the average coupling coefficients are approximately equal, i.e., when the dominant sub-system is not well defined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44883502015-07-02 Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System BozorgMagham, Amir E. Motesharrei, Safa Penny, Stephen G. Kalnay, Eugenia PLoS One Research Article Physical systems with time-varying internal couplings are abundant in nature. While the full governing equations of these systems are typically unknown due to insufficient understanding of their internal mechanisms, there is often interest in determining the leading element. Here, the leading element is defined as the sub-system with the largest coupling coefficient averaged over a selected time span. Previously, the Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) method has been employed to determine causality and dominant component in weakly coupled systems with constant coupling coefficients. In this study, CCM is applied to a pair of coupled Lorenz systems with time-varying coupling coefficients, exhibiting switching between dominant sub-systems in different periods. Four sets of numerical experiments are carried out. The first three cases consist of different coupling coefficient schemes: I) Periodic–constant, II) Normal, and III) Mixed Normal/Non-normal. In case IV, numerical experiment of cases II and III are repeated with imposed temporal uncertainties as well as additive normal noise. Our results show that, through detecting directional interactions, CCM identifies the leading sub-system in all cases except when the average coupling coefficients are approximately equal, i.e., when the dominant sub-system is not well defined. Public Library of Science 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4488350/ /pubmed/26125157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131226 Text en © 2015 BozorgMagham et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
BozorgMagham, Amir E.
Motesharrei, Safa
Penny, Stephen G.
Kalnay, Eugenia
Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title_full Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title_fullStr Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title_full_unstemmed Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title_short Causality Analysis: Identifying the Leading Element in a Coupled Dynamical System
title_sort causality analysis: identifying the leading element in a coupled dynamical system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131226
work_keys_str_mv AT bozorgmaghamamire causalityanalysisidentifyingtheleadingelementinacoupleddynamicalsystem
AT motesharreisafa causalityanalysisidentifyingtheleadingelementinacoupleddynamicalsystem
AT pennystepheng causalityanalysisidentifyingtheleadingelementinacoupleddynamicalsystem
AT kalnayeugenia causalityanalysisidentifyingtheleadingelementinacoupleddynamicalsystem