Cargando…

A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers

Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noble, Geoffrey P., Wang, Daphne W., Walsh, Daniel J., Barone, Justin R., Miller, Michael B., Nishina, Koren A., Li, Sheng, Supattapone, Surachai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017
_version_ 1782379141381750784
author Noble, Geoffrey P.
Wang, Daphne W.
Walsh, Daniel J.
Barone, Justin R.
Miller, Michael B.
Nishina, Koren A.
Li, Sheng
Supattapone, Surachai
author_facet Noble, Geoffrey P.
Wang, Daphne W.
Walsh, Daniel J.
Barone, Justin R.
Miller, Michael B.
Nishina, Koren A.
Li, Sheng
Supattapone, Surachai
author_sort Noble, Geoffrey P.
collection PubMed
description Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable levels of specific infectivity in bioassays, and the essential determinants of recombinant prion infectivity remain obscure. To identify structural and functional features specifically associated with infectivity, we compared the properties of two autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers derived from the same original template, which differ by >10(5)-fold in specific infectivity for wild-type mice. Structurally, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) studies revealed that solvent accessibility profiles of infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers are remarkably similar throughout their protease-resistant cores, except for two domains encompassing residues 91-115 and 144-163. Raman spectroscopy and immunoprecipitation studies confirm that these domains adopt distinct conformations within infectious versus non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers. Functionally, in vitro prion propagation experiments show that the non-infectious conformer is unable to seed mouse PrP(C) substrates containing a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, including native PrP(C). Taken together, these results indicate that having a conformation that can be specifically adopted by post-translationally modified PrP(C) molecules is an essential determinant of biological infectivity for recombinant prions, and suggest that this ability is associated with discrete features of PrP(Sc) structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44883592015-07-02 A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers Noble, Geoffrey P. Wang, Daphne W. Walsh, Daniel J. Barone, Justin R. Miller, Michael B. Nishina, Koren A. Li, Sheng Supattapone, Surachai PLoS Pathog Research Article Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable levels of specific infectivity in bioassays, and the essential determinants of recombinant prion infectivity remain obscure. To identify structural and functional features specifically associated with infectivity, we compared the properties of two autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers derived from the same original template, which differ by >10(5)-fold in specific infectivity for wild-type mice. Structurally, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) studies revealed that solvent accessibility profiles of infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers are remarkably similar throughout their protease-resistant cores, except for two domains encompassing residues 91-115 and 144-163. Raman spectroscopy and immunoprecipitation studies confirm that these domains adopt distinct conformations within infectious versus non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers. Functionally, in vitro prion propagation experiments show that the non-infectious conformer is unable to seed mouse PrP(C) substrates containing a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, including native PrP(C). Taken together, these results indicate that having a conformation that can be specifically adopted by post-translationally modified PrP(C) molecules is an essential determinant of biological infectivity for recombinant prions, and suggest that this ability is associated with discrete features of PrP(Sc) structure. Public Library of Science 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4488359/ /pubmed/26125623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017 Text en © 2015 Noble et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Noble, Geoffrey P.
Wang, Daphne W.
Walsh, Daniel J.
Barone, Justin R.
Miller, Michael B.
Nishina, Koren A.
Li, Sheng
Supattapone, Surachai
A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title_full A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title_fullStr A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title_full_unstemmed A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title_short A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
title_sort structural and functional comparison between infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant prp conformers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017
work_keys_str_mv AT noblegeoffreyp astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT wangdaphnew astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT walshdanielj astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT baronejustinr astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT millermichaelb astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT nishinakorena astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT lisheng astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT supattaponesurachai astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT noblegeoffreyp structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT wangdaphnew structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT walshdanielj structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT baronejustinr structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT millermichaelb structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT nishinakorena structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT lisheng structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers
AT supattaponesurachai structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers