Cargando…
A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers
Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017 |
_version_ | 1782379141381750784 |
---|---|
author | Noble, Geoffrey P. Wang, Daphne W. Walsh, Daniel J. Barone, Justin R. Miller, Michael B. Nishina, Koren A. Li, Sheng Supattapone, Surachai |
author_facet | Noble, Geoffrey P. Wang, Daphne W. Walsh, Daniel J. Barone, Justin R. Miller, Michael B. Nishina, Koren A. Li, Sheng Supattapone, Surachai |
author_sort | Noble, Geoffrey P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable levels of specific infectivity in bioassays, and the essential determinants of recombinant prion infectivity remain obscure. To identify structural and functional features specifically associated with infectivity, we compared the properties of two autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers derived from the same original template, which differ by >10(5)-fold in specific infectivity for wild-type mice. Structurally, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) studies revealed that solvent accessibility profiles of infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers are remarkably similar throughout their protease-resistant cores, except for two domains encompassing residues 91-115 and 144-163. Raman spectroscopy and immunoprecipitation studies confirm that these domains adopt distinct conformations within infectious versus non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers. Functionally, in vitro prion propagation experiments show that the non-infectious conformer is unable to seed mouse PrP(C) substrates containing a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, including native PrP(C). Taken together, these results indicate that having a conformation that can be specifically adopted by post-translationally modified PrP(C) molecules is an essential determinant of biological infectivity for recombinant prions, and suggest that this ability is associated with discrete features of PrP(Sc) structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4488359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44883592015-07-02 A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers Noble, Geoffrey P. Wang, Daphne W. Walsh, Daniel J. Barone, Justin R. Miller, Michael B. Nishina, Koren A. Li, Sheng Supattapone, Surachai PLoS Pathog Research Article Infectious prions contain a self-propagating, misfolded conformer of the prion protein termed PrP(Sc). A critical prediction of the protein-only hypothesis is that autocatalytic PrP(Sc) molecules should be infectious. However, some autocatalytic recombinant PrP(Sc) molecules have low or undetectable levels of specific infectivity in bioassays, and the essential determinants of recombinant prion infectivity remain obscure. To identify structural and functional features specifically associated with infectivity, we compared the properties of two autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers derived from the same original template, which differ by >10(5)-fold in specific infectivity for wild-type mice. Structurally, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) studies revealed that solvent accessibility profiles of infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers are remarkably similar throughout their protease-resistant cores, except for two domains encompassing residues 91-115 and 144-163. Raman spectroscopy and immunoprecipitation studies confirm that these domains adopt distinct conformations within infectious versus non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant PrP conformers. Functionally, in vitro prion propagation experiments show that the non-infectious conformer is unable to seed mouse PrP(C) substrates containing a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, including native PrP(C). Taken together, these results indicate that having a conformation that can be specifically adopted by post-translationally modified PrP(C) molecules is an essential determinant of biological infectivity for recombinant prions, and suggest that this ability is associated with discrete features of PrP(Sc) structure. Public Library of Science 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4488359/ /pubmed/26125623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017 Text en © 2015 Noble et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Noble, Geoffrey P. Wang, Daphne W. Walsh, Daniel J. Barone, Justin R. Miller, Michael B. Nishina, Koren A. Li, Sheng Supattapone, Surachai A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title | A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title_full | A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title_fullStr | A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title_full_unstemmed | A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title_short | A Structural and Functional Comparison Between Infectious and Non-Infectious Autocatalytic Recombinant PrP Conformers |
title_sort | structural and functional comparison between infectious and non-infectious autocatalytic recombinant prp conformers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noblegeoffreyp astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT wangdaphnew astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT walshdanielj astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT baronejustinr astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT millermichaelb astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT nishinakorena astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT lisheng astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT supattaponesurachai astructuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT noblegeoffreyp structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT wangdaphnew structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT walshdanielj structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT baronejustinr structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT millermichaelb structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT nishinakorena structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT lisheng structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers AT supattaponesurachai structuralandfunctionalcomparisonbetweeninfectiousandnoninfectiousautocatalyticrecombinantprpconformers |