Cargando…

Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating therapy-resistant diabetic macular oedema (DME). A 69-year-old man presented with persistent bilateral DME despite previous ranibizumab treatment. Bilateral study treatment comprised one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0081-7
_version_ 1782379166068375552
author ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof
author_facet ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof
author_sort ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating therapy-resistant diabetic macular oedema (DME). A 69-year-old man presented with persistent bilateral DME despite previous ranibizumab treatment. Bilateral study treatment comprised one cycle of three monthly ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg), followed by one cycle of three aflibercept injections (2.0 mg), a second ranibizumab cycle and a second aflibercept cycle. Baseline visual acuity (ETDRS score) was 60 letters for the right eye and 65 letters for the left eye. Baseline central foveal thickness (CFT) was 305 μm for the right eye and 453 μm for the left eye. Substantially improved outcomes were observed during the first aflibercept cycle. CFT was reduced by 150 μm (mean) in both the eyes and decreased below the lowest level achieved during the previous 2.5-year ranibizumab treatment. Visual acuity was improved by 17.5 letters (mean) in both the eyes. Reintroduction of ranibizumab immediately worsened the status of both eyes back to the baseline level. During the final aflibercept cycle, visual acuity and CFT improved to the same levels achieved during the first aflibercept cycle. In this case study, we prospectively switched the treatment three times and observed a dramatic and consistent treatment advantage for aflibercept. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10792-015-0081-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44884812015-07-07 Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof Int Ophthalmol Case Report The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating therapy-resistant diabetic macular oedema (DME). A 69-year-old man presented with persistent bilateral DME despite previous ranibizumab treatment. Bilateral study treatment comprised one cycle of three monthly ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg), followed by one cycle of three aflibercept injections (2.0 mg), a second ranibizumab cycle and a second aflibercept cycle. Baseline visual acuity (ETDRS score) was 60 letters for the right eye and 65 letters for the left eye. Baseline central foveal thickness (CFT) was 305 μm for the right eye and 453 μm for the left eye. Substantially improved outcomes were observed during the first aflibercept cycle. CFT was reduced by 150 μm (mean) in both the eyes and decreased below the lowest level achieved during the previous 2.5-year ranibizumab treatment. Visual acuity was improved by 17.5 letters (mean) in both the eyes. Reintroduction of ranibizumab immediately worsened the status of both eyes back to the baseline level. During the final aflibercept cycle, visual acuity and CFT improved to the same levels achieved during the first aflibercept cycle. In this case study, we prospectively switched the treatment three times and observed a dramatic and consistent treatment advantage for aflibercept. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10792-015-0081-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2015-05-20 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4488481/ /pubmed/25989873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0081-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Report
ROA Vandekerckhove, Kristof
Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title_full Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title_fullStr Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title_full_unstemmed Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title_short Aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
title_sort aflibercept versus ranibizumab for treating persistent diabetic macular oedema
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0081-7
work_keys_str_mv AT roavandekerckhovekristof afliberceptversusranibizumabfortreatingpersistentdiabeticmacularoedema