Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial

INTRODUCTION: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose treatment with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is failing, several biological treatment options are available. Often, another TNFi or a biological with another mode of action is prescribed. The objective of this study was to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manders, Sofie HM, Kievit, Wietske, Adang, Eddy, Brus, Herman L, Moens, Hein J Bernelot, Hartkamp, Andre, Hendriks, Lidy, Brouwer, Elisabeth, Visser, Henk, Vonkeman, Harald E, Hendrikx, Jos, Jansen, Tim L, Westhovens, Rene, van de Laar, Mart AFJ, van Riel, Piet LCM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5
_version_ 1782379271862353920
author Manders, Sofie HM
Kievit, Wietske
Adang, Eddy
Brus, Herman L
Moens, Hein J Bernelot
Hartkamp, Andre
Hendriks, Lidy
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Visser, Henk
Vonkeman, Harald E
Hendrikx, Jos
Jansen, Tim L
Westhovens, Rene
van de Laar, Mart AFJ
van Riel, Piet LCM
author_facet Manders, Sofie HM
Kievit, Wietske
Adang, Eddy
Brus, Herman L
Moens, Hein J Bernelot
Hartkamp, Andre
Hendriks, Lidy
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Visser, Henk
Vonkeman, Harald E
Hendrikx, Jos
Jansen, Tim L
Westhovens, Rene
van de Laar, Mart AFJ
van Riel, Piet LCM
author_sort Manders, Sofie HM
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose treatment with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is failing, several biological treatment options are available. Often, another TNFi or a biological with another mode of action is prescribed. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three biologic treatments with different modes of action in patients with RA whose TNFi therapy is failing. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, 1-year randomised trial in a multicentre setting. Patients with active RA despite previous TNFi treatment were randomised to receive abatacept, rituximab or a different TNFi. The primary outcome (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints) and the secondary outcomes (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and 36-item Short Form Health Survey scores) were analysed using linear mixed models. Cost-effectiveness was analysed on the basis of incremental net monetary benefit, which was based on quality-adjusted life-years (calculated using EQ-5D scores), and all medication expenditures consumed in 1 year. All analyses were also corrected for possible confounders. RESULTS: Of 144 randomised patients, 5 were excluded and 139 started taking abatacept (43 patients), rituximab (46 patients) or a different TNFi (50 patients). There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to multiple measures of RA outcomes. However, our analysis revealed that rituximab therapy is significantly more cost-effective than both abatacept and TNFi over a willingness-to-pay range of 0 to 80,000 euros. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatment options were similarly effective; however, when costs were factored into the treatment decision, rituximab was the best option available to patients whose first TNFi treatment failed. However, generalization of these costs to other countries should be undertaken carefully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register number NTR1605. Registered 24 December 2008. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4489004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44890042015-07-03 Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial Manders, Sofie HM Kievit, Wietske Adang, Eddy Brus, Herman L Moens, Hein J Bernelot Hartkamp, Andre Hendriks, Lidy Brouwer, Elisabeth Visser, Henk Vonkeman, Harald E Hendrikx, Jos Jansen, Tim L Westhovens, Rene van de Laar, Mart AFJ van Riel, Piet LCM Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose treatment with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is failing, several biological treatment options are available. Often, another TNFi or a biological with another mode of action is prescribed. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three biologic treatments with different modes of action in patients with RA whose TNFi therapy is failing. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, 1-year randomised trial in a multicentre setting. Patients with active RA despite previous TNFi treatment were randomised to receive abatacept, rituximab or a different TNFi. The primary outcome (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints) and the secondary outcomes (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and 36-item Short Form Health Survey scores) were analysed using linear mixed models. Cost-effectiveness was analysed on the basis of incremental net monetary benefit, which was based on quality-adjusted life-years (calculated using EQ-5D scores), and all medication expenditures consumed in 1 year. All analyses were also corrected for possible confounders. RESULTS: Of 144 randomised patients, 5 were excluded and 139 started taking abatacept (43 patients), rituximab (46 patients) or a different TNFi (50 patients). There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to multiple measures of RA outcomes. However, our analysis revealed that rituximab therapy is significantly more cost-effective than both abatacept and TNFi over a willingness-to-pay range of 0 to 80,000 euros. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatment options were similarly effective; however, when costs were factored into the treatment decision, rituximab was the best option available to patients whose first TNFi treatment failed. However, generalization of these costs to other countries should be undertaken carefully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register number NTR1605. Registered 24 December 2008. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4489004/ /pubmed/25997746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5 Text en © Manders et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manders, Sofie HM
Kievit, Wietske
Adang, Eddy
Brus, Herman L
Moens, Hein J Bernelot
Hartkamp, Andre
Hendriks, Lidy
Brouwer, Elisabeth
Visser, Henk
Vonkeman, Harald E
Hendrikx, Jos
Jansen, Tim L
Westhovens, Rene
van de Laar, Mart AFJ
van Riel, Piet LCM
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and tnfi treatment after previous failure with tnfi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5
work_keys_str_mv AT manderssofiehm costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT kievitwietske costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT adangeddy costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT brushermanl costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT moensheinjbernelot costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT hartkampandre costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT hendrikslidy costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT brouwerelisabeth costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT visserhenk costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT vonkemanharalde costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT hendrikxjos costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT jansentiml costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT westhovensrene costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT vandelaarmartafj costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT vanrielpietlcm costeffectivenessofabataceptrituximabandtnfitreatmentafterpreviousfailurewithtnfitreatmentinrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticmulticentrerandomisedtrial