Cargando…

Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients

BACKGROUND: Family support and patient satisfaction with treatment are crucial for aiding in the recovery from stroke. However, current validated stroke-specific questionnaires may not adequately capture the impact of these two variables on patients undergoing clinical trials of new drugs. Therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Yanhong, Yang, Jie, Zhang, Yanbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0246-0
_version_ 1782379310732017664
author Luo, Yanhong
Yang, Jie
Zhang, Yanbo
author_facet Luo, Yanhong
Yang, Jie
Zhang, Yanbo
author_sort Luo, Yanhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family support and patient satisfaction with treatment are crucial for aiding in the recovery from stroke. However, current validated stroke-specific questionnaires may not adequately capture the impact of these two variables on patients undergoing clinical trials of new drugs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new stroke patient-reported outcome measure (Stroke-PROM) instrument for capturing more comprehensive effects of stroke on patients participating in clinical trials of new drugs. METHODS: A conceptual framework and a pool of items for the preliminary Stroke-PROM were generated by consulting the relevant literature and other questionnaires created in China and other countries, and interviewing 20 patients and 4 experts to ensure that all germane parameters were included. During the first item-selection phase, classical test theory and item response theory were applied to an initial scale completed by 133 patients with stroke. During the item-revaluation phase, classical test theory and item response theory were used again, this time with 475 patients with stroke and 104 healthy participants. During the scale assessment phase, confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the final scale of the Stroke-PROM using the same study population as in the second item-selection phase. Reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility of the final scale were tested. RESULTS: The final scale of Stroke-PROM contained 46 items describing four domains (physiology, psychology, society and treatment). These four domains were subdivided into 10 subdomains. Cronbach’s α coefficients for the four domains ranged from 0.861 to 0.908. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the validity of the final scale, and the model fit index satisfied the criterion. Differences in the Stroke-PROM mean scores were significant between patients with stroke and healthy participants in nine subdomains (P < 0.001), indicating that the scale showed good responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The Stroke-PROM is a patient-reported outcome multidimensional questionnaire developed especially for clinical trials of new drugs and is focused on issues of family support and patient satisfaction with treatment. Extensive data analyses supported the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Stroke-PROM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0246-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4489208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44892082015-07-03 Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients Luo, Yanhong Yang, Jie Zhang, Yanbo Health Qual Life Outcomes Research Article BACKGROUND: Family support and patient satisfaction with treatment are crucial for aiding in the recovery from stroke. However, current validated stroke-specific questionnaires may not adequately capture the impact of these two variables on patients undergoing clinical trials of new drugs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new stroke patient-reported outcome measure (Stroke-PROM) instrument for capturing more comprehensive effects of stroke on patients participating in clinical trials of new drugs. METHODS: A conceptual framework and a pool of items for the preliminary Stroke-PROM were generated by consulting the relevant literature and other questionnaires created in China and other countries, and interviewing 20 patients and 4 experts to ensure that all germane parameters were included. During the first item-selection phase, classical test theory and item response theory were applied to an initial scale completed by 133 patients with stroke. During the item-revaluation phase, classical test theory and item response theory were used again, this time with 475 patients with stroke and 104 healthy participants. During the scale assessment phase, confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the final scale of the Stroke-PROM using the same study population as in the second item-selection phase. Reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility of the final scale were tested. RESULTS: The final scale of Stroke-PROM contained 46 items describing four domains (physiology, psychology, society and treatment). These four domains were subdivided into 10 subdomains. Cronbach’s α coefficients for the four domains ranged from 0.861 to 0.908. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the validity of the final scale, and the model fit index satisfied the criterion. Differences in the Stroke-PROM mean scores were significant between patients with stroke and healthy participants in nine subdomains (P < 0.001), indicating that the scale showed good responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The Stroke-PROM is a patient-reported outcome multidimensional questionnaire developed especially for clinical trials of new drugs and is focused on issues of family support and patient satisfaction with treatment. Extensive data analyses supported the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Stroke-PROM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0246-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4489208/ /pubmed/25953508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0246-0 Text en © Luo et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luo, Yanhong
Yang, Jie
Zhang, Yanbo
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title_full Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title_fullStr Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title_short Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
title_sort development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for stroke patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0246-0
work_keys_str_mv AT luoyanhong developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforstrokepatients
AT yangjie developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforstrokepatients
AT zhangyanbo developmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforstrokepatients