Cargando…

HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission

HIV infection can be effectively controlled by anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in most patients. However therapy must be continued for life, because interruption of ART leads to rapid recrudescence of infection from long-lived latently infected cells. A number of approaches are currently being develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinkevych, Mykola, Cromer, Deborah, Tolstrup, Martin, Grimm, Andrew J., Cooper, David A., Lewin, Sharon R., Søgaard, Ole S., Rasmussen, Thomas A., Kent, Stephen J., Kelleher, Anthony D., Davenport, Miles P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005000
_version_ 1782379387598929920
author Pinkevych, Mykola
Cromer, Deborah
Tolstrup, Martin
Grimm, Andrew J.
Cooper, David A.
Lewin, Sharon R.
Søgaard, Ole S.
Rasmussen, Thomas A.
Kent, Stephen J.
Kelleher, Anthony D.
Davenport, Miles P.
author_facet Pinkevych, Mykola
Cromer, Deborah
Tolstrup, Martin
Grimm, Andrew J.
Cooper, David A.
Lewin, Sharon R.
Søgaard, Ole S.
Rasmussen, Thomas A.
Kent, Stephen J.
Kelleher, Anthony D.
Davenport, Miles P.
author_sort Pinkevych, Mykola
collection PubMed
description HIV infection can be effectively controlled by anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in most patients. However therapy must be continued for life, because interruption of ART leads to rapid recrudescence of infection from long-lived latently infected cells. A number of approaches are currently being developed to ‘purge’ the reservoir of latently infected cells in order to either eliminate infection completely, or significantly delay the time to viral recrudescence after therapy interruption. A fundamental question in HIV research is how frequently the virus reactivates from latency, and thus how much the reservoir might need to be reduced to produce a prolonged antiretroviral-free HIV remission. Here we provide the first direct estimates of the frequency of viral recrudescence after ART interruption, combining data from four independent cohorts of patients undergoing treatment interruption, comprising 100 patients in total. We estimate that viral replication is initiated on average once every ≈6 days (range 5.1- 7.6 days). This rate is around 24 times lower than previous thought, and is very similar across the cohorts. In addition, we analyse data on the ratios of different ‘reactivation founder’ viruses in a separate cohort of patients undergoing ART-interruption, and estimate the frequency of successful reactivation to be once every 3.6 days. This suggests that a reduction in the reservoir size of around 50-70-fold would be required to increase the average time-to-recrudescence to about one year, and thus achieve at least a short period of anti-retroviral free HIV remission. Our analyses suggests that time-to-recrudescence studies will need to be large in order to detect modest changes in the reservoir, and that macaque models of SIV latency may have much higher frequencies of viral recrudescence after ART interruption than seen in human HIV infection. Understanding the mean frequency of recrudescence from latency is an important first step in approaches to prolong antiretroviral-free viral remission in HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4489624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44896242015-07-15 HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission Pinkevych, Mykola Cromer, Deborah Tolstrup, Martin Grimm, Andrew J. Cooper, David A. Lewin, Sharon R. Søgaard, Ole S. Rasmussen, Thomas A. Kent, Stephen J. Kelleher, Anthony D. Davenport, Miles P. PLoS Pathog Research Article HIV infection can be effectively controlled by anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in most patients. However therapy must be continued for life, because interruption of ART leads to rapid recrudescence of infection from long-lived latently infected cells. A number of approaches are currently being developed to ‘purge’ the reservoir of latently infected cells in order to either eliminate infection completely, or significantly delay the time to viral recrudescence after therapy interruption. A fundamental question in HIV research is how frequently the virus reactivates from latency, and thus how much the reservoir might need to be reduced to produce a prolonged antiretroviral-free HIV remission. Here we provide the first direct estimates of the frequency of viral recrudescence after ART interruption, combining data from four independent cohorts of patients undergoing treatment interruption, comprising 100 patients in total. We estimate that viral replication is initiated on average once every ≈6 days (range 5.1- 7.6 days). This rate is around 24 times lower than previous thought, and is very similar across the cohorts. In addition, we analyse data on the ratios of different ‘reactivation founder’ viruses in a separate cohort of patients undergoing ART-interruption, and estimate the frequency of successful reactivation to be once every 3.6 days. This suggests that a reduction in the reservoir size of around 50-70-fold would be required to increase the average time-to-recrudescence to about one year, and thus achieve at least a short period of anti-retroviral free HIV remission. Our analyses suggests that time-to-recrudescence studies will need to be large in order to detect modest changes in the reservoir, and that macaque models of SIV latency may have much higher frequencies of viral recrudescence after ART interruption than seen in human HIV infection. Understanding the mean frequency of recrudescence from latency is an important first step in approaches to prolong antiretroviral-free viral remission in HIV. Public Library of Science 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4489624/ /pubmed/26133551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005000 Text en © 2015 Pinkevych et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pinkevych, Mykola
Cromer, Deborah
Tolstrup, Martin
Grimm, Andrew J.
Cooper, David A.
Lewin, Sharon R.
Søgaard, Ole S.
Rasmussen, Thomas A.
Kent, Stephen J.
Kelleher, Anthony D.
Davenport, Miles P.
HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title_full HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title_fullStr HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title_full_unstemmed HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title_short HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption Occurs on Average Every 5-8 Days—Implications for HIV Remission
title_sort hiv reactivation from latency after treatment interruption occurs on average every 5-8 days—implications for hiv remission
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26133551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005000
work_keys_str_mv AT pinkevychmykola hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT cromerdeborah hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT tolstrupmartin hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT grimmandrewj hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT cooperdavida hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT lewinsharonr hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT søgaardoles hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT rasmussenthomasa hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT kentstephenj hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT kelleheranthonyd hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission
AT davenportmilesp hivreactivationfromlatencyaftertreatmentinterruptionoccursonaverageevery58daysimplicationsforhivremission