Cargando…

Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing

The oral microbiome, which is closely associated with many diseases, and the resident pathogenic oral bacteria, which can be transferred by close physical contact, are important public health considerations. Although the dog is the most common companion animal, the composition of the canine oral mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Changin, Lee, Kunkyu, Cheong, Yeotaek, Lee, Sang-Won, Park, Seung-Yong, Song, Chang-Seon, Choi, In-Soo, Lee, Joong-Bok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131468
_version_ 1782379432087912448
author Oh, Changin
Lee, Kunkyu
Cheong, Yeotaek
Lee, Sang-Won
Park, Seung-Yong
Song, Chang-Seon
Choi, In-Soo
Lee, Joong-Bok
author_facet Oh, Changin
Lee, Kunkyu
Cheong, Yeotaek
Lee, Sang-Won
Park, Seung-Yong
Song, Chang-Seon
Choi, In-Soo
Lee, Joong-Bok
author_sort Oh, Changin
collection PubMed
description The oral microbiome, which is closely associated with many diseases, and the resident pathogenic oral bacteria, which can be transferred by close physical contact, are important public health considerations. Although the dog is the most common companion animal, the composition of the canine oral microbiome, which may include human pathogenic bacteria, and its relationship with that of their owners are unclear. In this study, 16S rDNA pyrosequencing was used to compare the oral microbiomes of 10 dogs and their owners and to identify zoonotic pathogens. Pyrosequencing revealed 246 operational taxonomic units in the 10 samples, representing 57 genera from eight bacterial phyla. Firmicutes (57.6%), Proteobacteria (21.6%), Bacteroidetes (9.8%), Actinobacteria (7.1%), and Fusobacteria (3.9%) were the predominant phyla in the human oral samples, whereas Proteobacteria (25.7%), Actinobacteria (21%), Bacteroidetes (19.7%), Firmicutes (19.3%), and Fusobacteria (12.3%) were predominant in the canine oral samples. The predominant genera in the human samples were Streptococcus (43.9%), Neisseria (10.3%), Haemophilus (9.6%), Prevotella (8.4%), and Veillonella (8.1%), whereas the predominant genera in the canine samples were Actinomyces (17.2%), Unknown (16.8), Porphyromonas (14.8), Fusobacterium (11.8), and Neisseria (7.2%). The oral microbiomes of dogs and their owners were appreciably different, and similarity in the microbiomes of canines and their owners was not correlated with residing in the same household. Oral-to-oral transfer of Neisseria shayeganii, Porphyromonas canigingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Streptococcus minor from dogs to humans was suspected. The finding of potentially zoonotic and periodontopathic bacteria in the canine oral microbiome may be a public health concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4489859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44898592015-07-15 Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing Oh, Changin Lee, Kunkyu Cheong, Yeotaek Lee, Sang-Won Park, Seung-Yong Song, Chang-Seon Choi, In-Soo Lee, Joong-Bok PLoS One Research Article The oral microbiome, which is closely associated with many diseases, and the resident pathogenic oral bacteria, which can be transferred by close physical contact, are important public health considerations. Although the dog is the most common companion animal, the composition of the canine oral microbiome, which may include human pathogenic bacteria, and its relationship with that of their owners are unclear. In this study, 16S rDNA pyrosequencing was used to compare the oral microbiomes of 10 dogs and their owners and to identify zoonotic pathogens. Pyrosequencing revealed 246 operational taxonomic units in the 10 samples, representing 57 genera from eight bacterial phyla. Firmicutes (57.6%), Proteobacteria (21.6%), Bacteroidetes (9.8%), Actinobacteria (7.1%), and Fusobacteria (3.9%) were the predominant phyla in the human oral samples, whereas Proteobacteria (25.7%), Actinobacteria (21%), Bacteroidetes (19.7%), Firmicutes (19.3%), and Fusobacteria (12.3%) were predominant in the canine oral samples. The predominant genera in the human samples were Streptococcus (43.9%), Neisseria (10.3%), Haemophilus (9.6%), Prevotella (8.4%), and Veillonella (8.1%), whereas the predominant genera in the canine samples were Actinomyces (17.2%), Unknown (16.8), Porphyromonas (14.8), Fusobacterium (11.8), and Neisseria (7.2%). The oral microbiomes of dogs and their owners were appreciably different, and similarity in the microbiomes of canines and their owners was not correlated with residing in the same household. Oral-to-oral transfer of Neisseria shayeganii, Porphyromonas canigingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Streptococcus minor from dogs to humans was suspected. The finding of potentially zoonotic and periodontopathic bacteria in the canine oral microbiome may be a public health concern. Public Library of Science 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4489859/ /pubmed/26134411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131468 Text en © 2015 Oh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oh, Changin
Lee, Kunkyu
Cheong, Yeotaek
Lee, Sang-Won
Park, Seung-Yong
Song, Chang-Seon
Choi, In-Soo
Lee, Joong-Bok
Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title_full Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title_fullStr Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title_short Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing
title_sort comparison of the oral microbiomes of canines and their owners using next-generation sequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4489859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131468
work_keys_str_mv AT ohchangin comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT leekunkyu comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT cheongyeotaek comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT leesangwon comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT parkseungyong comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT songchangseon comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT choiinsoo comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT leejoongbok comparisonoftheoralmicrobiomesofcaninesandtheirownersusingnextgenerationsequencing