Cargando…

Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention

Visual phenomena demonstrating striking perceptual disappearances of salient stimuli have fascinated researchers because of their utility in identifying neural processes that underlie subjective visibility and invisibility. Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is appealing for such purposes because it, li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dieter, Kevin C., Tadin, Duje, Pearson, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11841
_version_ 1782379486225891328
author Dieter, Kevin C.
Tadin, Duje
Pearson, Joel
author_facet Dieter, Kevin C.
Tadin, Duje
Pearson, Joel
author_sort Dieter, Kevin C.
collection PubMed
description Visual phenomena demonstrating striking perceptual disappearances of salient stimuli have fascinated researchers because of their utility in identifying neural processes that underlie subjective visibility and invisibility. Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is appealing for such purposes because it, like a class of ostensibly related paradigms such as binocular rivalry, features periods of unequivocal subjective disappearances despite constant physical stimulation. It remains unclear, however, exactly how the mechanisms that cause MIB are related to subjectively observed fluctuations in visual awareness. To address this question, we used continuous flash suppression (CFS) to present the MIB stimulus outside visual awareness. Results indicated that MIB occasionally reappeared from suppression with its salient yellow target absent. To quantify this observation, we measured reaction times (RTs) to detect the yellow dot target following visible or perceptually suppressed MIB and indeed found no difference in RTs between these conditions. We also provide evidence that MIB fluctuations can occur without attention. In sum, these experiments indicate that MIB fluctuations are effectively changes in stimulus strength, which under typical conditions result in unmistakable subjective disappearances, but are not inherently fluctuations in stimulus visibility. More broadly, these results challenge the assumed privileged link between bistable stimuli and visual awareness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44903492015-07-08 Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention Dieter, Kevin C. Tadin, Duje Pearson, Joel Sci Rep Article Visual phenomena demonstrating striking perceptual disappearances of salient stimuli have fascinated researchers because of their utility in identifying neural processes that underlie subjective visibility and invisibility. Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is appealing for such purposes because it, like a class of ostensibly related paradigms such as binocular rivalry, features periods of unequivocal subjective disappearances despite constant physical stimulation. It remains unclear, however, exactly how the mechanisms that cause MIB are related to subjectively observed fluctuations in visual awareness. To address this question, we used continuous flash suppression (CFS) to present the MIB stimulus outside visual awareness. Results indicated that MIB occasionally reappeared from suppression with its salient yellow target absent. To quantify this observation, we measured reaction times (RTs) to detect the yellow dot target following visible or perceptually suppressed MIB and indeed found no difference in RTs between these conditions. We also provide evidence that MIB fluctuations can occur without attention. In sum, these experiments indicate that MIB fluctuations are effectively changes in stimulus strength, which under typical conditions result in unmistakable subjective disappearances, but are not inherently fluctuations in stimulus visibility. More broadly, these results challenge the assumed privileged link between bistable stimuli and visual awareness. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4490349/ /pubmed/26138079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11841 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Dieter, Kevin C.
Tadin, Duje
Pearson, Joel
Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title_full Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title_fullStr Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title_full_unstemmed Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title_short Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
title_sort motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11841
work_keys_str_mv AT dieterkevinc motioninducedblindnesscontinuesoutsidevisualawarenessandwithoutattention
AT tadinduje motioninducedblindnesscontinuesoutsidevisualawarenessandwithoutattention
AT pearsonjoel motioninducedblindnesscontinuesoutsidevisualawarenessandwithoutattention