Cargando…

Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL

Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matena, Julia, Petersen, Svea, Gieseke, Matthias, Teske, Michael, Beyerbach, Martin, Kampmann, Andreas, Escobar, Hugo Murua, Gellrich, Nils-Claudius, Haferkamp, Heinz, Nolte, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287
_version_ 1782379516617818112
author Matena, Julia
Petersen, Svea
Gieseke, Matthias
Teske, Michael
Beyerbach, Martin
Kampmann, Andreas
Escobar, Hugo Murua
Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
Haferkamp, Heinz
Nolte, Ingo
author_facet Matena, Julia
Petersen, Svea
Gieseke, Matthias
Teske, Michael
Beyerbach, Martin
Kampmann, Andreas
Escobar, Hugo Murua
Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
Haferkamp, Heinz
Nolte, Ingo
author_sort Matena, Julia
collection PubMed
description Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the biocompatibility. In the present study we used the polymer coating polycaprolactone (PCL), intended to lower the corrosion rate of magnesium. Additionally, improvement of implant geometry can increase bone remodeling. Porous structures are known to support vessel ingrowth and thus increase osseointegration. With the selective laser melting (SLM) process, defined open porous structures can be created. Recently, highly reactive magnesium has also been processed by SLM. We performed studies with a flat magnesium layer and with porous magnesium implants coated with polymers. The SLM produced magnesium was compared with the titanium alloy TiAl6V4, as titanium is already established for the SLM-process. For testing the biocompatibility, we used primary murine osteoblasts. Results showed a reduced corrosion rate and good biocompatibility of the SLM produced magnesium with PCL coating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44904952015-07-07 Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL Matena, Julia Petersen, Svea Gieseke, Matthias Teske, Michael Beyerbach, Martin Kampmann, Andreas Escobar, Hugo Murua Gellrich, Nils-Claudius Haferkamp, Heinz Nolte, Ingo Int J Mol Sci Article Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the biocompatibility. In the present study we used the polymer coating polycaprolactone (PCL), intended to lower the corrosion rate of magnesium. Additionally, improvement of implant geometry can increase bone remodeling. Porous structures are known to support vessel ingrowth and thus increase osseointegration. With the selective laser melting (SLM) process, defined open porous structures can be created. Recently, highly reactive magnesium has also been processed by SLM. We performed studies with a flat magnesium layer and with porous magnesium implants coated with polymers. The SLM produced magnesium was compared with the titanium alloy TiAl6V4, as titanium is already established for the SLM-process. For testing the biocompatibility, we used primary murine osteoblasts. Results showed a reduced corrosion rate and good biocompatibility of the SLM produced magnesium with PCL coating. MDPI 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4490495/ /pubmed/26068455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matena, Julia
Petersen, Svea
Gieseke, Matthias
Teske, Michael
Beyerbach, Martin
Kampmann, Andreas
Escobar, Hugo Murua
Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
Haferkamp, Heinz
Nolte, Ingo
Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title_full Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title_fullStr Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title_short Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
title_sort comparison of selective laser melted titanium and magnesium implants coated with pcl
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287
work_keys_str_mv AT matenajulia comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT petersensvea comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT giesekematthias comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT teskemichael comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT beyerbachmartin comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT kampmannandreas comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT escobarhugomurua comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT gellrichnilsclaudius comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT haferkampheinz comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl
AT nolteingo comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl