Cargando…
Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL
Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the bi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287 |
_version_ | 1782379516617818112 |
---|---|
author | Matena, Julia Petersen, Svea Gieseke, Matthias Teske, Michael Beyerbach, Martin Kampmann, Andreas Escobar, Hugo Murua Gellrich, Nils-Claudius Haferkamp, Heinz Nolte, Ingo |
author_facet | Matena, Julia Petersen, Svea Gieseke, Matthias Teske, Michael Beyerbach, Martin Kampmann, Andreas Escobar, Hugo Murua Gellrich, Nils-Claudius Haferkamp, Heinz Nolte, Ingo |
author_sort | Matena, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the biocompatibility. In the present study we used the polymer coating polycaprolactone (PCL), intended to lower the corrosion rate of magnesium. Additionally, improvement of implant geometry can increase bone remodeling. Porous structures are known to support vessel ingrowth and thus increase osseointegration. With the selective laser melting (SLM) process, defined open porous structures can be created. Recently, highly reactive magnesium has also been processed by SLM. We performed studies with a flat magnesium layer and with porous magnesium implants coated with polymers. The SLM produced magnesium was compared with the titanium alloy TiAl6V4, as titanium is already established for the SLM-process. For testing the biocompatibility, we used primary murine osteoblasts. Results showed a reduced corrosion rate and good biocompatibility of the SLM produced magnesium with PCL coating. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4490495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44904952015-07-07 Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL Matena, Julia Petersen, Svea Gieseke, Matthias Teske, Michael Beyerbach, Martin Kampmann, Andreas Escobar, Hugo Murua Gellrich, Nils-Claudius Haferkamp, Heinz Nolte, Ingo Int J Mol Sci Article Degradable implant material for bone remodeling that corresponds to the physiological stability of bone has still not been developed. Promising degradable materials with good mechanical properties are magnesium and magnesium alloys. However, excessive gas production due to corrosion can lower the biocompatibility. In the present study we used the polymer coating polycaprolactone (PCL), intended to lower the corrosion rate of magnesium. Additionally, improvement of implant geometry can increase bone remodeling. Porous structures are known to support vessel ingrowth and thus increase osseointegration. With the selective laser melting (SLM) process, defined open porous structures can be created. Recently, highly reactive magnesium has also been processed by SLM. We performed studies with a flat magnesium layer and with porous magnesium implants coated with polymers. The SLM produced magnesium was compared with the titanium alloy TiAl6V4, as titanium is already established for the SLM-process. For testing the biocompatibility, we used primary murine osteoblasts. Results showed a reduced corrosion rate and good biocompatibility of the SLM produced magnesium with PCL coating. MDPI 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4490495/ /pubmed/26068455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matena, Julia Petersen, Svea Gieseke, Matthias Teske, Michael Beyerbach, Martin Kampmann, Andreas Escobar, Hugo Murua Gellrich, Nils-Claudius Haferkamp, Heinz Nolte, Ingo Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title | Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title_full | Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title_short | Comparison of Selective Laser Melted Titanium and Magnesium Implants Coated with PCL |
title_sort | comparison of selective laser melted titanium and magnesium implants coated with pcl |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matenajulia comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT petersensvea comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT giesekematthias comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT teskemichael comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT beyerbachmartin comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT kampmannandreas comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT escobarhugomurua comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT gellrichnilsclaudius comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT haferkampheinz comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl AT nolteingo comparisonofselectivelasermeltedtitaniumandmagnesiumimplantscoatedwithpcl |