Cargando…
Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Pub. Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8392 |
_version_ | 1782379533117161472 |
---|---|
author | Flenner, Elijah Szamel, Grzegorz |
author_facet | Flenner, Elijah Szamel, Grzegorz |
author_sort | Flenner, Elijah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4490572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Pub. Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44905722015-07-13 Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions Flenner, Elijah Szamel, Grzegorz Nat Commun Article The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions. Nature Pub. Group 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4490572/ /pubmed/26067877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8392 Text en Copyright © 2015, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Flenner, Elijah Szamel, Grzegorz Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title | Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title_full | Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title_fullStr | Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title_full_unstemmed | Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title_short | Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
title_sort | fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flennerelijah fundamentaldifferencesbetweenglassydynamicsintwoandthreedimensions AT szamelgrzegorz fundamentaldifferencesbetweenglassydynamicsintwoandthreedimensions |