Cargando…
Quantitative benefit–harm assessment for setting research priorities: the example of roflumilast for patients with COPD
BACKGROUND: When faced with uncertainties about the effects of medical interventions regulatory agencies, guideline developers, clinicians, and researchers commonly ask for more research, and in particular for more randomized trials. The conduct of additional randomized trials is, however, sometimes...
Autores principales: | Puhan, Milo A., Yu, Tsung, Boyd, Cynthia M., ter Riet, Gerben |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0398-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Benefit-harm analysis and charts for individualized and preference-sensitive prevention: example of low dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer
por: Puhan, Milo A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Simple functional performance tests and mortality in COPD
por: Puhan, Milo A., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. A Benefit and Harm Analysis
por: Stegeman, Inge, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Prediction of long-term clinical outcomes using simple functional exercise performance tests in patients with COPD: a 5-year prospective cohort study
por: Crook, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2017)