Cargando…

Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution

BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liew, Yi Xin, Teo, Jocelyn, Too, Irene Ai-Ling, Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai, Tan, Ai Ling, Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr, Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon, Lee, Winnie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6
_version_ 1782379543048224768
author Liew, Yi Xin
Teo, Jocelyn
Too, Irene Ai-Ling
Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai
Tan, Ai Ling
Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr
Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon
Lee, Winnie
author_facet Liew, Yi Xin
Teo, Jocelyn
Too, Irene Ai-Ling
Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai
Tan, Ai Ling
Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr
Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon
Lee, Winnie
author_sort Liew, Yi Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are colonized. METHODS: Clinical data and fungal surveillance cultures in 28 patients were recorded from November 2010, and January to February 2011. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, micafungin, caspofungin and anidulafungin were tested via Etest. The utilities of BDG, Candida score and colonization index for candidiasis diagnosis were compared via ROC. RESULTS: 30 BDG assays were performed in 28 patients. Four assay cases had concurrent colonization and infection; 23 had concurrent colonization and no infection; three had no concurrent colonization and infection. Of 136 surveillance swabs, 52 (38.24 %) were positive for Candida spp, with C. albicans being the commonest. Azole resistance was detected in C. albicans (7 %). C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were, respectively, 100 and 7 % SDD to fluconazole. All 3 tests showed high sensitivity of 75–100 % but poor specificity ranging 15.38–38.46 %. BDG performed the best (AUC of 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Despite that positive BDG is common in surgical patients with Candida spp colonization, BDG performed the best when compared to CI and CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44906382015-07-04 Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution Liew, Yi Xin Teo, Jocelyn Too, Irene Ai-Ling Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Tan, Ai Ling Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon Lee, Winnie BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are colonized. METHODS: Clinical data and fungal surveillance cultures in 28 patients were recorded from November 2010, and January to February 2011. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, micafungin, caspofungin and anidulafungin were tested via Etest. The utilities of BDG, Candida score and colonization index for candidiasis diagnosis were compared via ROC. RESULTS: 30 BDG assays were performed in 28 patients. Four assay cases had concurrent colonization and infection; 23 had concurrent colonization and no infection; three had no concurrent colonization and infection. Of 136 surveillance swabs, 52 (38.24 %) were positive for Candida spp, with C. albicans being the commonest. Azole resistance was detected in C. albicans (7 %). C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were, respectively, 100 and 7 % SDD to fluconazole. All 3 tests showed high sensitivity of 75–100 % but poor specificity ranging 15.38–38.46 %. BDG performed the best (AUC of 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Despite that positive BDG is common in surgical patients with Candida spp colonization, BDG performed the best when compared to CI and CS. BioMed Central 2015-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4490638/ /pubmed/26137997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6 Text en © Liew et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liew, Yi Xin
Teo, Jocelyn
Too, Irene Ai-Ling
Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai
Tan, Ai Ling
Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr
Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon
Lee, Winnie
Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title_full Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title_fullStr Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title_full_unstemmed Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title_short Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
title_sort candida surveillance in surgical intensive care unit (sicu) in a tertiary institution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liewyixin candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT teojocelyn candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT tooireneailing candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT nganceciliachenglai candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT tanailing candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT chlebickimaciejpiotr candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT kwaandrealayhoon candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution
AT leewinnie candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution