Cargando…
Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution
BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6 |
_version_ | 1782379543048224768 |
---|---|
author | Liew, Yi Xin Teo, Jocelyn Too, Irene Ai-Ling Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Tan, Ai Ling Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon Lee, Winnie |
author_facet | Liew, Yi Xin Teo, Jocelyn Too, Irene Ai-Ling Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Tan, Ai Ling Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon Lee, Winnie |
author_sort | Liew, Yi Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are colonized. METHODS: Clinical data and fungal surveillance cultures in 28 patients were recorded from November 2010, and January to February 2011. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, micafungin, caspofungin and anidulafungin were tested via Etest. The utilities of BDG, Candida score and colonization index for candidiasis diagnosis were compared via ROC. RESULTS: 30 BDG assays were performed in 28 patients. Four assay cases had concurrent colonization and infection; 23 had concurrent colonization and no infection; three had no concurrent colonization and infection. Of 136 surveillance swabs, 52 (38.24 %) were positive for Candida spp, with C. albicans being the commonest. Azole resistance was detected in C. albicans (7 %). C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were, respectively, 100 and 7 % SDD to fluconazole. All 3 tests showed high sensitivity of 75–100 % but poor specificity ranging 15.38–38.46 %. BDG performed the best (AUC of 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Despite that positive BDG is common in surgical patients with Candida spp colonization, BDG performed the best when compared to CI and CS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4490638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44906382015-07-04 Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution Liew, Yi Xin Teo, Jocelyn Too, Irene Ai-Ling Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Tan, Ai Ling Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon Lee, Winnie BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Colonization of patients occurs before development into invasive candidiasis. There is a need to determine the incidences of Candida colonization and infection in SICU patients, and evaluate the usefulness of beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in diagnosing invasive candidiasis when patients are colonized. METHODS: Clinical data and fungal surveillance cultures in 28 patients were recorded from November 2010, and January to February 2011. Susceptibilities of Candida isolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, micafungin, caspofungin and anidulafungin were tested via Etest. The utilities of BDG, Candida score and colonization index for candidiasis diagnosis were compared via ROC. RESULTS: 30 BDG assays were performed in 28 patients. Four assay cases had concurrent colonization and infection; 23 had concurrent colonization and no infection; three had no concurrent colonization and infection. Of 136 surveillance swabs, 52 (38.24 %) were positive for Candida spp, with C. albicans being the commonest. Azole resistance was detected in C. albicans (7 %). C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were, respectively, 100 and 7 % SDD to fluconazole. All 3 tests showed high sensitivity of 75–100 % but poor specificity ranging 15.38–38.46 %. BDG performed the best (AUC of 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Despite that positive BDG is common in surgical patients with Candida spp colonization, BDG performed the best when compared to CI and CS. BioMed Central 2015-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4490638/ /pubmed/26137997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6 Text en © Liew et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liew, Yi Xin Teo, Jocelyn Too, Irene Ai-Ling Ngan, Cecilia Cheng-Lai Tan, Ai Ling Chlebicki, Maciej Piotr Kwa, Andrea Lay-Hoon Lee, Winnie Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title | Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title_full | Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title_fullStr | Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title_full_unstemmed | Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title_short | Candida Surveillance in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) in a Tertiary Institution |
title_sort | candida surveillance in surgical intensive care unit (sicu) in a tertiary institution |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0997-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liewyixin candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT teojocelyn candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT tooireneailing candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT nganceciliachenglai candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT tanailing candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT chlebickimaciejpiotr candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT kwaandrealayhoon candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution AT leewinnie candidasurveillanceinsurgicalintensivecareunitsicuinatertiaryinstitution |