Cargando…

How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia

BACKGROUND: Parks are generally an under-utilized resource in the community with great potential to enhance levels of physical activity. If parks are to attract more visitors across a broad cross-section of the population and facilitate increased physical activity, research is needed to better under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veitch, Jenny, Carver, Alison, Abbott, Gavin, Giles-Corti, Billie, Timperio, Anna, Salmon, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6
_version_ 1782379545306857472
author Veitch, Jenny
Carver, Alison
Abbott, Gavin
Giles-Corti, Billie
Timperio, Anna
Salmon, Jo
author_facet Veitch, Jenny
Carver, Alison
Abbott, Gavin
Giles-Corti, Billie
Timperio, Anna
Salmon, Jo
author_sort Veitch, Jenny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parks are generally an under-utilized resource in the community with great potential to enhance levels of physical activity. If parks are to attract more visitors across a broad cross-section of the population and facilitate increased physical activity, research is needed to better understand park visitor characteristics and how visitors spend their time in parks. The Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study is a natural experiment monitoring a park upgrade in a low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhood. This study described the observed baseline characteristics of park visitors (age, sex) and characteristics of visitation (weekday or weekend day, period of the day) and explored how these characteristics were associated with observed park-based physical activity in two metropolitan parks located Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Direct observations of park visitors were conducted using a modified version of SOPARC (the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities) on four weekdays and four weekend days. During weekdays, observations were conducted every hour from 7:30 am-4:30 pm and on weekend days from 8:30 am-4:30 pm. This equated to a total of 1460 scans across the two parks. Chi-square tests examined bivariate associations between park-based physical activity, and socio-demographic and park visitation characteristics. Logistic regression models examined the odds of being observed engaging in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity relative to lying/sitting/standing according to socio-demographic and park visitation characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 4756 park visitors were observed with the majority visiting on weekend days (87 %) and in the afternoon (41 %). Most visitors (62 %) were lying, sitting or standing, with only 29 % observed engaging in moderate-intensity and 9 % in vigorous-intensity physical activity. Park use differed by time of day, sex, age group, and neighborhood SES. Physical activity was lower for women than men (OR 0.76) and higher among visitors in the high SES area (OR 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Parks offer substantial opportunities for people of all ages to engage in physical activity; however, this study showed that a large proportion of the park visitors observed were engaged in sedentary pursuits. Further research on how park design, amenities and programming can optimize park visitation and park-based physical activity is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547, registration date 11.1.2014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44906482015-07-04 How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia Veitch, Jenny Carver, Alison Abbott, Gavin Giles-Corti, Billie Timperio, Anna Salmon, Jo BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Parks are generally an under-utilized resource in the community with great potential to enhance levels of physical activity. If parks are to attract more visitors across a broad cross-section of the population and facilitate increased physical activity, research is needed to better understand park visitor characteristics and how visitors spend their time in parks. The Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study is a natural experiment monitoring a park upgrade in a low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhood. This study described the observed baseline characteristics of park visitors (age, sex) and characteristics of visitation (weekday or weekend day, period of the day) and explored how these characteristics were associated with observed park-based physical activity in two metropolitan parks located Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Direct observations of park visitors were conducted using a modified version of SOPARC (the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities) on four weekdays and four weekend days. During weekdays, observations were conducted every hour from 7:30 am-4:30 pm and on weekend days from 8:30 am-4:30 pm. This equated to a total of 1460 scans across the two parks. Chi-square tests examined bivariate associations between park-based physical activity, and socio-demographic and park visitation characteristics. Logistic regression models examined the odds of being observed engaging in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity relative to lying/sitting/standing according to socio-demographic and park visitation characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 4756 park visitors were observed with the majority visiting on weekend days (87 %) and in the afternoon (41 %). Most visitors (62 %) were lying, sitting or standing, with only 29 % observed engaging in moderate-intensity and 9 % in vigorous-intensity physical activity. Park use differed by time of day, sex, age group, and neighborhood SES. Physical activity was lower for women than men (OR 0.76) and higher among visitors in the high SES area (OR 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Parks offer substantial opportunities for people of all ages to engage in physical activity; however, this study showed that a large proportion of the park visitors observed were engaged in sedentary pursuits. Further research on how park design, amenities and programming can optimize park visitation and park-based physical activity is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547, registration date 11.1.2014 BioMed Central 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4490648/ /pubmed/26141112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6 Text en © Veitch et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Veitch, Jenny
Carver, Alison
Abbott, Gavin
Giles-Corti, Billie
Timperio, Anna
Salmon, Jo
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title_full How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title_fullStr How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title_full_unstemmed How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title_short How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia
title_sort how active are people in metropolitan parks? an observational study of park visitation in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6
work_keys_str_mv AT veitchjenny howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia
AT carveralison howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia
AT abbottgavin howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia
AT gilescortibillie howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia
AT timperioanna howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia
AT salmonjo howactivearepeopleinmetropolitanparksanobservationalstudyofparkvisitationinaustralia