Cargando…

Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)

BACKGROUND: The collaborative care planning study (COCAPP) is a cross-national comparative study of care planning and coordination in community mental healthcare settings. The context and delivery of mental health care is diverging between the countries of England and Wales whilst retaining points o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, Alan, Hannigan, Ben, Coffey, Michael, Jones, Aled, Barlow, Sally, Cohen, Rachel, Všetečková, Jitka, Faulkner, Alison, Haddad, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0538-2
_version_ 1782379551187271680
author Simpson, Alan
Hannigan, Ben
Coffey, Michael
Jones, Aled
Barlow, Sally
Cohen, Rachel
Všetečková, Jitka
Faulkner, Alison
Haddad, Mark
author_facet Simpson, Alan
Hannigan, Ben
Coffey, Michael
Jones, Aled
Barlow, Sally
Cohen, Rachel
Všetečková, Jitka
Faulkner, Alison
Haddad, Mark
author_sort Simpson, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The collaborative care planning study (COCAPP) is a cross-national comparative study of care planning and coordination in community mental healthcare settings. The context and delivery of mental health care is diverging between the countries of England and Wales whilst retaining points of common interest, hence providing a rich geographical comparison for research. Across England the key vehicle for the provision of recovery-focused, personalised, collaborative mental health care is the care programme approach (CPA). The CPA is a form of case management introduced in England in 1991, then revised in 2008. In Wales the CPA was introduced in 2003 but has now been superseded by The Mental Health (Care Co-ordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (CTP) Regulations (Mental Health Measure), a new statutory framework. In both countries, the CPA/CTP requires providers to: comprehensively assess health/social care needs and risks; develop a written care plan (which may incorporate risk assessments, crisis and contingency plans, advanced directives, relapse prevention plans, etc.) in collaboration with the service user and carer(s); allocate a care coordinator; and regularly review care. The overarching aim of this study is to identify and describe the factors that ensure CPA/CTP care planning and coordination is personalised, recovery-focused and conducted collaboratively. METHODS/DESIGN: COCAPP will employ a concurrent transformative mixed methods approach with embedded case studies. Phase 1 (Macro-level) will consider the national context through a meta-narrative mapping (MNM) review of national policies and the relevant research literature. Phase 2 (Meso-level and Micro-level) will include in-depth micro-level case studies of everyday ‘frontline’ practice and experience with detailed qualitative data from interviews and reviews of individual care plans. This will be nested within larger meso-level survey datasets, senior-level interviews and policy reviews in order to provide potential explanations and understanding. DISCUSSION: COCAPP will help identify the key components that support and hinder the provision of personalised, recovery-focused care planning and provide an informed rationale for a future planned intervention and evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44906762015-07-04 Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP) Simpson, Alan Hannigan, Ben Coffey, Michael Jones, Aled Barlow, Sally Cohen, Rachel Všetečková, Jitka Faulkner, Alison Haddad, Mark BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The collaborative care planning study (COCAPP) is a cross-national comparative study of care planning and coordination in community mental healthcare settings. The context and delivery of mental health care is diverging between the countries of England and Wales whilst retaining points of common interest, hence providing a rich geographical comparison for research. Across England the key vehicle for the provision of recovery-focused, personalised, collaborative mental health care is the care programme approach (CPA). The CPA is a form of case management introduced in England in 1991, then revised in 2008. In Wales the CPA was introduced in 2003 but has now been superseded by The Mental Health (Care Co-ordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (CTP) Regulations (Mental Health Measure), a new statutory framework. In both countries, the CPA/CTP requires providers to: comprehensively assess health/social care needs and risks; develop a written care plan (which may incorporate risk assessments, crisis and contingency plans, advanced directives, relapse prevention plans, etc.) in collaboration with the service user and carer(s); allocate a care coordinator; and regularly review care. The overarching aim of this study is to identify and describe the factors that ensure CPA/CTP care planning and coordination is personalised, recovery-focused and conducted collaboratively. METHODS/DESIGN: COCAPP will employ a concurrent transformative mixed methods approach with embedded case studies. Phase 1 (Macro-level) will consider the national context through a meta-narrative mapping (MNM) review of national policies and the relevant research literature. Phase 2 (Meso-level and Micro-level) will include in-depth micro-level case studies of everyday ‘frontline’ practice and experience with detailed qualitative data from interviews and reviews of individual care plans. This will be nested within larger meso-level survey datasets, senior-level interviews and policy reviews in order to provide potential explanations and understanding. DISCUSSION: COCAPP will help identify the key components that support and hinder the provision of personalised, recovery-focused care planning and provide an informed rationale for a future planned intervention and evaluation. BioMed Central 2015-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4490676/ /pubmed/26138855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0538-2 Text en © Simpson et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Simpson, Alan
Hannigan, Ben
Coffey, Michael
Jones, Aled
Barlow, Sally
Cohen, Rachel
Všetečková, Jitka
Faulkner, Alison
Haddad, Mark
Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title_full Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title_fullStr Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title_short Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP)
title_sort study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (cocapp)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0538-2
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsonalan studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT hanniganben studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT coffeymichael studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT jonesaled studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT barlowsally studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT cohenrachel studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT vseteckovajitka studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT faulkneralison studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp
AT haddadmark studyprotocolcrossnationalcomparativecasestudyofrecoveryfocusedmentalhealthcareplanningandcoordinationcocapp