Cargando…
Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2 |
_version_ | 1782379564474826752 |
---|---|
author | Vixner, Linda Mårtensson, Lena B. Schytt, Erica |
author_facet | Vixner, Linda Mårtensson, Lena B. Schytt, Erica |
author_sort | Vixner, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of pain relief, including epidural analgesia. To dismiss an under-treatment of pain in the trial, we did a long-term follow up on the recollection of labour pain and the birth experience comparing acupuncture with manual stimulation, acupuncture with combined electrical and manual stimulation with standard care. Our hypothesis was that despite the lower frequency of use of other pain relief, women who had received EA would make similar retrospective assessments of labour pain and the birth experience 2 months after birth as women who received standard care (SC) or acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA). METHODS: Secondary analyses of data collected for a randomised controlled trial conducted at two delivery wards in Sweden. A total of 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 min of MA or EA, or SC without acupuncture. Questionnaires were administered the day after partus and 2 months later. RESULTS: Two months postpartum, the mean recalled pain on the visual analogue scale (SC: 70.1, MA: 69.3 and EA: 68.7) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95 % confidence interval [CI] −6.3 to 7.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 1.3 CI 95 % −5.5 to 8.1). Positive birth experience (SC: 54.3 %, MA: 64.6 % and EA: 61.0 %) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8, CI 95 % 0.9 to 3.7 and SC vs EA: OR 1.4 CI 95 % 0.7 to 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower use of other pain relief, women who received acupuncture with the combination of manual and electrical stimulation during labour made the same retrospective assessments of labour pain and birth experience 2 months postpartum as those who received acupuncture with manual stimulation or standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4490752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44907522015-07-04 Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience Vixner, Linda Mårtensson, Lena B. Schytt, Erica BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of pain relief, including epidural analgesia. To dismiss an under-treatment of pain in the trial, we did a long-term follow up on the recollection of labour pain and the birth experience comparing acupuncture with manual stimulation, acupuncture with combined electrical and manual stimulation with standard care. Our hypothesis was that despite the lower frequency of use of other pain relief, women who had received EA would make similar retrospective assessments of labour pain and the birth experience 2 months after birth as women who received standard care (SC) or acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA). METHODS: Secondary analyses of data collected for a randomised controlled trial conducted at two delivery wards in Sweden. A total of 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 min of MA or EA, or SC without acupuncture. Questionnaires were administered the day after partus and 2 months later. RESULTS: Two months postpartum, the mean recalled pain on the visual analogue scale (SC: 70.1, MA: 69.3 and EA: 68.7) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95 % confidence interval [CI] −6.3 to 7.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 1.3 CI 95 % −5.5 to 8.1). Positive birth experience (SC: 54.3 %, MA: 64.6 % and EA: 61.0 %) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8, CI 95 % 0.9 to 3.7 and SC vs EA: OR 1.4 CI 95 % 0.7 to 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower use of other pain relief, women who received acupuncture with the combination of manual and electrical stimulation during labour made the same retrospective assessments of labour pain and birth experience 2 months postpartum as those who received acupuncture with manual stimulation or standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950 BioMed Central 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4490752/ /pubmed/26066641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2 Text en © Vixner et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vixner, Linda Mårtensson, Lena B. Schytt, Erica Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title_full | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title_fullStr | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title_short | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
title_sort | acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vixnerlinda acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience AT martenssonlenab acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience AT schytterica acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience |