Cargando…

Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience

BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vixner, Linda, Mårtensson, Lena B., Schytt, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2
_version_ 1782379564474826752
author Vixner, Linda
Mårtensson, Lena B.
Schytt, Erica
author_facet Vixner, Linda
Mårtensson, Lena B.
Schytt, Erica
author_sort Vixner, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of pain relief, including epidural analgesia. To dismiss an under-treatment of pain in the trial, we did a long-term follow up on the recollection of labour pain and the birth experience comparing acupuncture with manual stimulation, acupuncture with combined electrical and manual stimulation with standard care. Our hypothesis was that despite the lower frequency of use of other pain relief, women who had received EA would make similar retrospective assessments of labour pain and the birth experience 2 months after birth as women who received standard care (SC) or acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA). METHODS: Secondary analyses of data collected for a randomised controlled trial conducted at two delivery wards in Sweden. A total of 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 min of MA or EA, or SC without acupuncture. Questionnaires were administered the day after partus and 2 months later. RESULTS: Two months postpartum, the mean recalled pain on the visual analogue scale (SC: 70.1, MA: 69.3 and EA: 68.7) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95 % confidence interval [CI] −6.3 to 7.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 1.3 CI 95 % −5.5 to 8.1). Positive birth experience (SC: 54.3 %, MA: 64.6 % and EA: 61.0 %) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8, CI 95 % 0.9 to 3.7 and SC vs EA: OR 1.4 CI 95 % 0.7 to 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower use of other pain relief, women who received acupuncture with the combination of manual and electrical stimulation during labour made the same retrospective assessments of labour pain and birth experience 2 months postpartum as those who received acupuncture with manual stimulation or standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4490752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44907522015-07-04 Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience Vixner, Linda Mårtensson, Lena B. Schytt, Erica BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: In a previous randomised controlled trial we showed that acupuncture with a combination of manual- and electrical stimulation (EA) did not affect the level of pain, as compared with acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA) and standard care (SC), but reduced the need for other forms of pain relief, including epidural analgesia. To dismiss an under-treatment of pain in the trial, we did a long-term follow up on the recollection of labour pain and the birth experience comparing acupuncture with manual stimulation, acupuncture with combined electrical and manual stimulation with standard care. Our hypothesis was that despite the lower frequency of use of other pain relief, women who had received EA would make similar retrospective assessments of labour pain and the birth experience 2 months after birth as women who received standard care (SC) or acupuncture with manual stimulation (MA). METHODS: Secondary analyses of data collected for a randomised controlled trial conducted at two delivery wards in Sweden. A total of 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 min of MA or EA, or SC without acupuncture. Questionnaires were administered the day after partus and 2 months later. RESULTS: Two months postpartum, the mean recalled pain on the visual analogue scale (SC: 70.1, MA: 69.3 and EA: 68.7) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95 % confidence interval [CI] −6.3 to 7.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 1.3 CI 95 % −5.5 to 8.1). Positive birth experience (SC: 54.3 %, MA: 64.6 % and EA: 61.0 %) did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] 1.8, CI 95 % 0.9 to 3.7 and SC vs EA: OR 1.4 CI 95 % 0.7 to 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower use of other pain relief, women who received acupuncture with the combination of manual and electrical stimulation during labour made the same retrospective assessments of labour pain and birth experience 2 months postpartum as those who received acupuncture with manual stimulation or standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950 BioMed Central 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4490752/ /pubmed/26066641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2 Text en © Vixner et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vixner, Linda
Mårtensson, Lena B.
Schytt, Erica
Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title_full Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title_fullStr Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title_full_unstemmed Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title_short Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
title_sort acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0708-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vixnerlinda acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience
AT martenssonlenab acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience
AT schytterica acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainatwomonthfollowupofrecollectionofpainandbirthexperience