Cargando…
A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone
Validated biomarkers are needed to improve risk assessment and treatment decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The Oncotype DX(®) DCIS Score (DS) was shown to predict the risk of local recurrence (LR) in individuals with low-risk DCIS treated by breast-conserv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6 |
_version_ | 1782379591568982016 |
---|---|
author | Rakovitch, Eileen Nofech-Mozes, Sharon Hanna, Wedad Baehner, Frederick L. Saskin, Refik Butler, Steven M. Tuck, Alan Sengupta, Sandip Elavathil, Leela Jani, Prashant A. Bonin, Michel Chang, Martin C. Robertson, Susan J. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Fong, Cindy Anderson, Joseph M. Jamshidian, Farid Miller, Dave P. Cherbavaz, Diana B. Shak, Steven Paszat, Lawrence |
author_facet | Rakovitch, Eileen Nofech-Mozes, Sharon Hanna, Wedad Baehner, Frederick L. Saskin, Refik Butler, Steven M. Tuck, Alan Sengupta, Sandip Elavathil, Leela Jani, Prashant A. Bonin, Michel Chang, Martin C. Robertson, Susan J. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Fong, Cindy Anderson, Joseph M. Jamshidian, Farid Miller, Dave P. Cherbavaz, Diana B. Shak, Steven Paszat, Lawrence |
author_sort | Rakovitch, Eileen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Validated biomarkers are needed to improve risk assessment and treatment decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The Oncotype DX(®) DCIS Score (DS) was shown to predict the risk of local recurrence (LR) in individuals with low-risk DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone. Our objective was to confirm these results in a larger population-based cohort of individuals. We used an established population-based cohort of individuals diagnosed with DCIS treated with BCS alone from 1994 to 2003 with validation of treatment and outcomes. Central pathology assessment excluded cases with invasive cancer, DCIS < 2 mm or positive margins. Cox model was used to determine the relationship between independent covariates, the DS (hazard ratio (HR)/50 C(p) units (U)) and LR. Tumor blocks were collected for 828 patients. Final evaluable population includes 718 cases, of whom 571 had negative margins. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. 100 cases developed LR following BCS alone (DCIS, N = 44; invasive, N = 57). In the primary pre-specified analysis, the DS was associated with any LR (DCIS or invasive) in ER+ patients (HR 2.26; P < 0.001) and in all patients regardless of ER status (HR 2.15; P < 0.001). DCIS Score provided independent information on LR risk beyond clinical and pathologic variables including size, age, grade, necrosis, multifocality, and subtype (adjusted HR 1.68; P = 0.02). DCIS was associated with invasive LR (HR 1.78; P = 0.04) and DCIS LR (HR 2.43; P = 0.005). The DCIS Score independently predicts and quantifies individualized recurrence risk in a population of patients with pure DCIS treated by BCS alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4491104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44911042015-07-08 A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone Rakovitch, Eileen Nofech-Mozes, Sharon Hanna, Wedad Baehner, Frederick L. Saskin, Refik Butler, Steven M. Tuck, Alan Sengupta, Sandip Elavathil, Leela Jani, Prashant A. Bonin, Michel Chang, Martin C. Robertson, Susan J. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Fong, Cindy Anderson, Joseph M. Jamshidian, Farid Miller, Dave P. Cherbavaz, Diana B. Shak, Steven Paszat, Lawrence Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial Validated biomarkers are needed to improve risk assessment and treatment decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The Oncotype DX(®) DCIS Score (DS) was shown to predict the risk of local recurrence (LR) in individuals with low-risk DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone. Our objective was to confirm these results in a larger population-based cohort of individuals. We used an established population-based cohort of individuals diagnosed with DCIS treated with BCS alone from 1994 to 2003 with validation of treatment and outcomes. Central pathology assessment excluded cases with invasive cancer, DCIS < 2 mm or positive margins. Cox model was used to determine the relationship between independent covariates, the DS (hazard ratio (HR)/50 C(p) units (U)) and LR. Tumor blocks were collected for 828 patients. Final evaluable population includes 718 cases, of whom 571 had negative margins. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. 100 cases developed LR following BCS alone (DCIS, N = 44; invasive, N = 57). In the primary pre-specified analysis, the DS was associated with any LR (DCIS or invasive) in ER+ patients (HR 2.26; P < 0.001) and in all patients regardless of ER status (HR 2.15; P < 0.001). DCIS Score provided independent information on LR risk beyond clinical and pathologic variables including size, age, grade, necrosis, multifocality, and subtype (adjusted HR 1.68; P = 0.02). DCIS was associated with invasive LR (HR 1.78; P = 0.04) and DCIS LR (HR 2.43; P = 0.005). The DCIS Score independently predicts and quantifies individualized recurrence risk in a population of patients with pure DCIS treated by BCS alone. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-06-29 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4491104/ /pubmed/26119102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Rakovitch, Eileen Nofech-Mozes, Sharon Hanna, Wedad Baehner, Frederick L. Saskin, Refik Butler, Steven M. Tuck, Alan Sengupta, Sandip Elavathil, Leela Jani, Prashant A. Bonin, Michel Chang, Martin C. Robertson, Susan J. Slodkowska, Elzbieta Fong, Cindy Anderson, Joseph M. Jamshidian, Farid Miller, Dave P. Cherbavaz, Diana B. Shak, Steven Paszat, Lawrence A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title | A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title_full | A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title_fullStr | A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title_full_unstemmed | A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title_short | A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
title_sort | population-based validation study of the dcis score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rakovitcheileen apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT nofechmozessharon apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT hannawedad apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT baehnerfrederickl apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT saskinrefik apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT butlerstevenm apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT tuckalan apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT senguptasandip apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT elavathilleela apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT janiprashanta apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT boninmichel apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT changmartinc apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT robertsonsusanj apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT slodkowskaelzbieta apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT fongcindy apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT andersonjosephm apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT jamshidianfarid apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT millerdavep apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT cherbavazdianab apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT shaksteven apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT paszatlawrence apopulationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT rakovitcheileen populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT nofechmozessharon populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT hannawedad populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT baehnerfrederickl populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT saskinrefik populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT butlerstevenm populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT tuckalan populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT senguptasandip populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT elavathilleela populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT janiprashanta populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT boninmichel populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT changmartinc populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT robertsonsusanj populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT slodkowskaelzbieta populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT fongcindy populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT andersonjosephm populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT jamshidianfarid populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT millerdavep populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT cherbavazdianab populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT shaksteven populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone AT paszatlawrence populationbasedvalidationstudyofthedcisscorepredictingrecurrenceriskinindividualstreatedbybreastconservingsurgeryalone |