Cargando…

The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis

BACKGROUND: Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis plays a crucial role in metastasis and tumor progression. However, the significance of intratumoral lymphovascular density (I-LVD) and peritumoral lymphovascular density (P-LVD) has been controversial in gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pak, Kyung Ho, Jo, Ara, Choi, Hye Ji, Choi, Younghee, Kim, Hyunki, Cheong, Jae-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1501-9
_version_ 1782379612997681152
author Pak, Kyung Ho
Jo, Ara
Choi, Hye Ji
Choi, Younghee
Kim, Hyunki
Cheong, Jae-Ho
author_facet Pak, Kyung Ho
Jo, Ara
Choi, Hye Ji
Choi, Younghee
Kim, Hyunki
Cheong, Jae-Ho
author_sort Pak, Kyung Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis plays a crucial role in metastasis and tumor progression. However, the significance of intratumoral lymphovascular density (I-LVD) and peritumoral lymphovascular density (P-LVD) has been controversial in gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of clinicopathologic characteristics with respect to I-LVD and P-LVD in gastric cancer. METHODS: Samples of I-LVD and P-LVD from 66 patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were assessed after staining with D2-40, an immunostaining marker for lymphatic endothelium. The mean number of lymphatic vessels in three hotspots was calculated in intratumoral and peritumoral areas. RESULTS: The peritumoral lymphatics were enlarged with dilated lumens compared to the intratumoral lymphatics. I-LVD was positively correlated with diffuse gastric cancer subtype, tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, tumor node metastasis stage, and overall survival (P <0.05). P-LVD was associated with lymphovascular invasion, node stage, and disease-free survival (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that P-LVD had an important role in lymph node metastasis, while I-LVD was more associated with depth of tumor invasion. However, both LVDs contributed to gastric cancer progression and prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4491256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44912562015-07-05 The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis Pak, Kyung Ho Jo, Ara Choi, Hye Ji Choi, Younghee Kim, Hyunki Cheong, Jae-Ho BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis plays a crucial role in metastasis and tumor progression. However, the significance of intratumoral lymphovascular density (I-LVD) and peritumoral lymphovascular density (P-LVD) has been controversial in gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of clinicopathologic characteristics with respect to I-LVD and P-LVD in gastric cancer. METHODS: Samples of I-LVD and P-LVD from 66 patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were assessed after staining with D2-40, an immunostaining marker for lymphatic endothelium. The mean number of lymphatic vessels in three hotspots was calculated in intratumoral and peritumoral areas. RESULTS: The peritumoral lymphatics were enlarged with dilated lumens compared to the intratumoral lymphatics. I-LVD was positively correlated with diffuse gastric cancer subtype, tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, tumor node metastasis stage, and overall survival (P <0.05). P-LVD was associated with lymphovascular invasion, node stage, and disease-free survival (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that P-LVD had an important role in lymph node metastasis, while I-LVD was more associated with depth of tumor invasion. However, both LVDs contributed to gastric cancer progression and prognosis. BioMed Central 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4491256/ /pubmed/26141595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1501-9 Text en © Pak et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pak, Kyung Ho
Jo, Ara
Choi, Hye Ji
Choi, Younghee
Kim, Hyunki
Cheong, Jae-Ho
The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title_full The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title_fullStr The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title_full_unstemmed The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title_short The different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
title_sort different role of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphangiogenesis in gastric cancer progression and prognosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1501-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pakkyungho thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT joara thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT choihyeji thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT choiyounghee thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT kimhyunki thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT cheongjaeho thedifferentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT pakkyungho differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT joara differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT choihyeji differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT choiyounghee differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT kimhyunki differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis
AT cheongjaeho differentroleofintratumoralandperitumorallymphangiogenesisingastriccancerprogressionandprognosis