Cargando…

Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study

BACKGROUND: Successful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirleitner, Barbara, Schuff, Maximilian, Vanderzwalmen, Pierre, Stecher, Astrid, Okhowat, Jasmin, Hradecký, Libor, Kohoutek, Tomáš, Králícková, Milena, Spitzer, Dietmar, Zech, Nicolas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0069-1
_version_ 1782379617916551168
author Wirleitner, Barbara
Schuff, Maximilian
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Stecher, Astrid
Okhowat, Jasmin
Hradecký, Libor
Kohoutek, Tomáš
Králícková, Milena
Spitzer, Dietmar
Zech, Nicolas H.
author_facet Wirleitner, Barbara
Schuff, Maximilian
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Stecher, Astrid
Okhowat, Jasmin
Hradecký, Libor
Kohoutek, Tomáš
Králícková, Milena
Spitzer, Dietmar
Zech, Nicolas H.
author_sort Wirleitner, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasion of the embryo into the decidualized uterus. Production of hCG was reported to be dependent on blastocyst quality and several articles suggested that intrauterine hCG injection increases pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF patients. However, no study has as yet analysed birth rates as final outcome. Our objective was to determine whether clinical outcome after blastocyst transfer can be improved by intrauterine injection of hCG and whether this is dependent on blastocyst quality. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in two settings. In cohort A, hCG application was performed two days before blastocyst transfer. In cohort B, the administration of hCG occurred just prior to embryo transfer on day 5. For both cohorts, patients were randomised to either intrauterine hCG application or to the control group that received culture medium. Clinical outcome was analysed according to blastocyst quality of transferred embryos. RESULTS: The outcome of 182 IVF-cycles (cohort A) and 1004 IVF-cycles (cohort B) was analysed. All patients received a fresh autologous blastocyst transfer on day five. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates (PR), clinical pregnancy rates (cPR), miscarriage rates (MR), and live birth rates (LBR). No improvement of clinical outcome after intrauterine hCG administration on day 3 (cohort A) or day 5 (cohort B) was found, independently of blastocyst quality transferred. The final outcome in cohort A: LBR after transfer of top blastocysts was 50.0 % with hCG and 53.3 % in the control group. With non-top blastocysts, LBR of 17.1 % (hCG) and 18.2 % (control) were observed (n.s.). In cohort B, LBR with top blastocysts was 53.3 % (hCG) and 48.4 % (control), with non-top blastocysts it came to 28.7 % (hCG) and 35.0 % (control). The differences between the groups were statistically not significant. Furthermore, we investigated a possible benefit of hCG administration in correlation with female age. In both age groups (<38 years and ≥ 38 years) we found similar LBR after treatment with hCG vs. medium. A LBR of 47.1 % vs. 48.7 % was obtained in the younger group and 26.6 % vs. 30.8 % in the older group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies indicating a substantial benefit from intrauterine hCG application in cleavage stage embryo transfers, in our study we could not find any evidence for improvement of clinical outcome in blastocyst transfer cycles, neither with top nor with non-top quality morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4491277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44912772015-07-05 Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study Wirleitner, Barbara Schuff, Maximilian Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Stecher, Astrid Okhowat, Jasmin Hradecký, Libor Kohoutek, Tomáš Králícková, Milena Spitzer, Dietmar Zech, Nicolas H. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Successful embryo implantation depends on a well-timed maternal-embryonic crosstalk. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secreted by the embryo is known to play a key role in this process and to trigger a complex signal transduction cascade allowing the apposition, attachment, and invasion of the embryo into the decidualized uterus. Production of hCG was reported to be dependent on blastocyst quality and several articles suggested that intrauterine hCG injection increases pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF patients. However, no study has as yet analysed birth rates as final outcome. Our objective was to determine whether clinical outcome after blastocyst transfer can be improved by intrauterine injection of hCG and whether this is dependent on blastocyst quality. METHODS: A prospective randomised study was conducted in two settings. In cohort A, hCG application was performed two days before blastocyst transfer. In cohort B, the administration of hCG occurred just prior to embryo transfer on day 5. For both cohorts, patients were randomised to either intrauterine hCG application or to the control group that received culture medium. Clinical outcome was analysed according to blastocyst quality of transferred embryos. RESULTS: The outcome of 182 IVF-cycles (cohort A) and 1004 IVF-cycles (cohort B) was analysed. All patients received a fresh autologous blastocyst transfer on day five. Primary outcomes were pregnancy rates (PR), clinical pregnancy rates (cPR), miscarriage rates (MR), and live birth rates (LBR). No improvement of clinical outcome after intrauterine hCG administration on day 3 (cohort A) or day 5 (cohort B) was found, independently of blastocyst quality transferred. The final outcome in cohort A: LBR after transfer of top blastocysts was 50.0 % with hCG and 53.3 % in the control group. With non-top blastocysts, LBR of 17.1 % (hCG) and 18.2 % (control) were observed (n.s.). In cohort B, LBR with top blastocysts was 53.3 % (hCG) and 48.4 % (control), with non-top blastocysts it came to 28.7 % (hCG) and 35.0 % (control). The differences between the groups were statistically not significant. Furthermore, we investigated a possible benefit of hCG administration in correlation with female age. In both age groups (<38 years and ≥ 38 years) we found similar LBR after treatment with hCG vs. medium. A LBR of 47.1 % vs. 48.7 % was obtained in the younger group and 26.6 % vs. 30.8 % in the older group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies indicating a substantial benefit from intrauterine hCG application in cleavage stage embryo transfers, in our study we could not find any evidence for improvement of clinical outcome in blastocyst transfer cycles, neither with top nor with non-top quality morphology. BioMed Central 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4491277/ /pubmed/26141379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0069-1 Text en © Wirleitner et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wirleitner, Barbara
Schuff, Maximilian
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Stecher, Astrid
Okhowat, Jasmin
Hradecký, Libor
Kohoutek, Tomáš
Králícková, Milena
Spitzer, Dietmar
Zech, Nicolas H.
Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title_full Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title_fullStr Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title_short Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
title_sort intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26141379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0069-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wirleitnerbarbara intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT schuffmaximilian intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT vanderzwalmenpierre intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT stecherastrid intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT okhowatjasmin intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT hradeckylibor intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT kohoutektomas intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT kralickovamilena intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT spitzerdietmar intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT zechnicolash intrauterineadministrationofhumanchorionicgonadotropindoesnotimprovepregnancyandlifebirthratesindependentlyofblastocystqualityarandomisedprospectivestudy