Cargando…
Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy mig...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26145718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774 |
_version_ | 1782379701679947776 |
---|---|
author | Chaibi, Aleksander Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė Bjørn Russell, Michael |
author_facet | Chaibi, Aleksander Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė Bjørn Russell, Michael |
author_sort | Chaibi, Aleksander |
collection | PubMed |
description | At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy migraineurs were randomized to a single-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial that consisted of 12 treatment sessions over 3 months. The participants were randomized to chiropractic SMT or placebo (sham manipulation). After each session, the participants were surveyed on whether they thought they had undergone active treatment (“yes” or “no”) and how strongly they believed that active treatment was received (numeric rating scale 0–10). The outcome measures included the rate of successful blinding and the certitude of the participants’ beliefs in both treatment groups. At each treatment session, more than 80% of the participants believed that they had undergone active treatment, regardless of group allocation. The odds ratio for believing that active treatment was received was >10 for all treatment sessions in both groups (all p < 0.001). The blinding was maintained throughout the RCT. Our results strongly demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a single-blinded manual-therapy RCT with placebo and to maintain the blinding throughout 12 treatment sessions given over 3 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4491841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44918412015-07-08 Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial Chaibi, Aleksander Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė Bjørn Russell, Michael Sci Rep Article At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy migraineurs were randomized to a single-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial that consisted of 12 treatment sessions over 3 months. The participants were randomized to chiropractic SMT or placebo (sham manipulation). After each session, the participants were surveyed on whether they thought they had undergone active treatment (“yes” or “no”) and how strongly they believed that active treatment was received (numeric rating scale 0–10). The outcome measures included the rate of successful blinding and the certitude of the participants’ beliefs in both treatment groups. At each treatment session, more than 80% of the participants believed that they had undergone active treatment, regardless of group allocation. The odds ratio for believing that active treatment was received was >10 for all treatment sessions in both groups (all p < 0.001). The blinding was maintained throughout the RCT. Our results strongly demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a single-blinded manual-therapy RCT with placebo and to maintain the blinding throughout 12 treatment sessions given over 3 months. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4491841/ /pubmed/26145718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Chaibi, Aleksander Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė Bjørn Russell, Michael Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | validation of placebo in a manual therapy randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26145718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaibialeksander validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT saltytebenthjurate validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bjørnrussellmichael validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial |