Cargando…

Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial

At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy mig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaibi, Aleksander, Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė, Bjørn Russell, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26145718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774
_version_ 1782379701679947776
author Chaibi, Aleksander
Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė
Bjørn Russell, Michael
author_facet Chaibi, Aleksander
Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė
Bjørn Russell, Michael
author_sort Chaibi, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy migraineurs were randomized to a single-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial that consisted of 12 treatment sessions over 3 months. The participants were randomized to chiropractic SMT or placebo (sham manipulation). After each session, the participants were surveyed on whether they thought they had undergone active treatment (“yes” or “no”) and how strongly they believed that active treatment was received (numeric rating scale 0–10). The outcome measures included the rate of successful blinding and the certitude of the participants’ beliefs in both treatment groups. At each treatment session, more than 80% of the participants believed that they had undergone active treatment, regardless of group allocation. The odds ratio for believing that active treatment was received was >10 for all treatment sessions in both groups (all p < 0.001). The blinding was maintained throughout the RCT. Our results strongly demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a single-blinded manual-therapy RCT with placebo and to maintain the blinding throughout 12 treatment sessions given over 3 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4491841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44918412015-07-08 Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial Chaibi, Aleksander Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė Bjørn Russell, Michael Sci Rep Article At present, no consensus exists among clinical and academic experts regarding an appropriate placebo for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible to conduct a chiropractic manual-therapy RCT with placebo. Seventy migraineurs were randomized to a single-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial that consisted of 12 treatment sessions over 3 months. The participants were randomized to chiropractic SMT or placebo (sham manipulation). After each session, the participants were surveyed on whether they thought they had undergone active treatment (“yes” or “no”) and how strongly they believed that active treatment was received (numeric rating scale 0–10). The outcome measures included the rate of successful blinding and the certitude of the participants’ beliefs in both treatment groups. At each treatment session, more than 80% of the participants believed that they had undergone active treatment, regardless of group allocation. The odds ratio for believing that active treatment was received was >10 for all treatment sessions in both groups (all p < 0.001). The blinding was maintained throughout the RCT. Our results strongly demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a single-blinded manual-therapy RCT with placebo and to maintain the blinding throughout 12 treatment sessions given over 3 months. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4491841/ /pubmed/26145718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Chaibi, Aleksander
Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė
Bjørn Russell, Michael
Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort validation of placebo in a manual therapy randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26145718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11774
work_keys_str_mv AT chaibialeksander validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saltytebenthjurate validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bjørnrussellmichael validationofplaceboinamanualtherapyrandomizedcontrolledtrial