Cargando…

Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to make a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of cochlear dead regions (DRs) and the factors affecting the results of the threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test in patients with hearing loss of various etiologies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between May and July 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ho Yun, Seo, Yu Mi, Kim, Kyung Ae, Kang, Yeon Shin, Cho, Chin Saeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Audiological Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185787
http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.20
_version_ 1782379715836772352
author Lee, Ho Yun
Seo, Yu Mi
Kim, Kyung Ae
Kang, Yeon Shin
Cho, Chin Saeng
author_facet Lee, Ho Yun
Seo, Yu Mi
Kim, Kyung Ae
Kang, Yeon Shin
Cho, Chin Saeng
author_sort Lee, Ho Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to make a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of cochlear dead regions (DRs) and the factors affecting the results of the threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test in patients with hearing loss of various etiologies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between May and July 2014, 109 patients (191 ears) with hearing loss who visited our outpatient clinic were prospectively enrolled. Pure tone audiometry and TEN (HL) test were performed for all the patients. DR at each frequency was indicated by masked thresholds of ≥10 dB above the TEN level and ≥10 dB above the absolute threshold. RESULTS: DR was present in 15.7% (n=30) of the 191 ears. According to disease entity, 16.6% of patients with sensorineural hearing loss had a DR. However, DR was absent in patients with chronic otitis media. According to audiometric configurations, DR was most common in moderately severe, flat hearing loss. Significantly worse hearing thresholds for both mean hearing level and hearing threshold at each frequency were found in the presence of DR (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that only the mean hearing level (odds ratio: 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.021-1.085) affected the presence of DR. CONCLUSIONS: Although performance of the TEN test is limited by frequencies and hearing levels, it provides additional information regarding DRs and may therefore have the potential to be used as a prognostic tool for diverse diseases causing hearing loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4491942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Audiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44919422015-07-16 Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study Lee, Ho Yun Seo, Yu Mi Kim, Kyung Ae Kang, Yeon Shin Cho, Chin Saeng J Audiol Otol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to make a preliminary assessment of the prevalence of cochlear dead regions (DRs) and the factors affecting the results of the threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test in patients with hearing loss of various etiologies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between May and July 2014, 109 patients (191 ears) with hearing loss who visited our outpatient clinic were prospectively enrolled. Pure tone audiometry and TEN (HL) test were performed for all the patients. DR at each frequency was indicated by masked thresholds of ≥10 dB above the TEN level and ≥10 dB above the absolute threshold. RESULTS: DR was present in 15.7% (n=30) of the 191 ears. According to disease entity, 16.6% of patients with sensorineural hearing loss had a DR. However, DR was absent in patients with chronic otitis media. According to audiometric configurations, DR was most common in moderately severe, flat hearing loss. Significantly worse hearing thresholds for both mean hearing level and hearing threshold at each frequency were found in the presence of DR (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that only the mean hearing level (odds ratio: 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.021-1.085) affected the presence of DR. CONCLUSIONS: Although performance of the TEN test is limited by frequencies and hearing levels, it provides additional information regarding DRs and may therefore have the potential to be used as a prognostic tool for diverse diseases causing hearing loss. The Korean Audiological Society 2015-04 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4491942/ /pubmed/26185787 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.20 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Audiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Ho Yun
Seo, Yu Mi
Kim, Kyung Ae
Kang, Yeon Shin
Cho, Chin Saeng
Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title_full Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title_short Clinical Application of the Threshold Equalizing Noise Test in Patients with Hearing Loss of Various Etiologies: A Preliminary Study
title_sort clinical application of the threshold equalizing noise test in patients with hearing loss of various etiologies: a preliminary study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185787
http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.20
work_keys_str_mv AT leehoyun clinicalapplicationofthethresholdequalizingnoisetestinpatientswithhearinglossofvariousetiologiesapreliminarystudy
AT seoyumi clinicalapplicationofthethresholdequalizingnoisetestinpatientswithhearinglossofvariousetiologiesapreliminarystudy
AT kimkyungae clinicalapplicationofthethresholdequalizingnoisetestinpatientswithhearinglossofvariousetiologiesapreliminarystudy
AT kangyeonshin clinicalapplicationofthethresholdequalizingnoisetestinpatientswithhearinglossofvariousetiologiesapreliminarystudy
AT chochinsaeng clinicalapplicationofthethresholdequalizingnoisetestinpatientswithhearinglossofvariousetiologiesapreliminarystudy