Cargando…

Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ji Young, Lee, Jin Tae, Heo, Hye Jeong, Choi, Chul-Hee, Choi, Seong Hee, Lee, Kyungjae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Audiological Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39
_version_ 1782379717422219264
author Lee, Ji Young
Lee, Jin Tae
Heo, Hye Jeong
Choi, Chul-Hee
Choi, Seong Hee
Lee, Kyungjae
author_facet Lee, Ji Young
Lee, Jin Tae
Heo, Hye Jeong
Choi, Chul-Hee
Choi, Seong Hee
Lee, Kyungjae
author_sort Lee, Ji Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen young adults and fifteen middle-aged adults with normal hearing participated in the present study. Three types of noise [subway noise, vacuum noise, and multi-talker babble (MTB)] were presented via a loudspeaker at three SNRs of 5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Speech recognition was analyzed using the word recognition score. RESULTS: 1) Speech recognition in subway noise was the greatest in comparison to vacuum noise and MTB, 2) at the SNR of -5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than vacuum noise and in vacuum noise than MTB while at the SNRs of 0 and 5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB, 3) speech recognition decreased as the SNR decreased, and 4) young adults showed better speech recognition performance in all types of noises at all SNRs than middle-aged adults. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in real-life background noise was affected by the type of noise, SNR, and age. The results suggest that the frequency distribution, amplitude fluctuation, informational masking, and cognition may be important underlying factors determining speech recognition performance in noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4491949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Audiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44919492015-07-16 Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing Lee, Ji Young Lee, Jin Tae Heo, Hye Jeong Choi, Chul-Hee Choi, Seong Hee Lee, Kyungjae J Audiol Otol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen young adults and fifteen middle-aged adults with normal hearing participated in the present study. Three types of noise [subway noise, vacuum noise, and multi-talker babble (MTB)] were presented via a loudspeaker at three SNRs of 5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Speech recognition was analyzed using the word recognition score. RESULTS: 1) Speech recognition in subway noise was the greatest in comparison to vacuum noise and MTB, 2) at the SNR of -5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than vacuum noise and in vacuum noise than MTB while at the SNRs of 0 and 5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB, 3) speech recognition decreased as the SNR decreased, and 4) young adults showed better speech recognition performance in all types of noises at all SNRs than middle-aged adults. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in real-life background noise was affected by the type of noise, SNR, and age. The results suggest that the frequency distribution, amplitude fluctuation, informational masking, and cognition may be important underlying factors determining speech recognition performance in noise. The Korean Audiological Society 2015-04 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4491949/ /pubmed/26185790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Audiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Ji Young
Lee, Jin Tae
Heo, Hye Jeong
Choi, Chul-Hee
Choi, Seong Hee
Lee, Kyungjae
Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title_full Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title_fullStr Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title_full_unstemmed Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title_short Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
title_sort speech recognition in real-life background noise by young and middle-aged adults with normal hearing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185790
http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39
work_keys_str_mv AT leejiyoung speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing
AT leejintae speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing
AT heohyejeong speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing
AT choichulhee speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing
AT choiseonghee speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing
AT leekyungjae speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing