Cargando…
Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Audiological Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39 |
_version_ | 1782379717422219264 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ji Young Lee, Jin Tae Heo, Hye Jeong Choi, Chul-Hee Choi, Seong Hee Lee, Kyungjae |
author_facet | Lee, Ji Young Lee, Jin Tae Heo, Hye Jeong Choi, Chul-Hee Choi, Seong Hee Lee, Kyungjae |
author_sort | Lee, Ji Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen young adults and fifteen middle-aged adults with normal hearing participated in the present study. Three types of noise [subway noise, vacuum noise, and multi-talker babble (MTB)] were presented via a loudspeaker at three SNRs of 5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Speech recognition was analyzed using the word recognition score. RESULTS: 1) Speech recognition in subway noise was the greatest in comparison to vacuum noise and MTB, 2) at the SNR of -5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than vacuum noise and in vacuum noise than MTB while at the SNRs of 0 and 5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB, 3) speech recognition decreased as the SNR decreased, and 4) young adults showed better speech recognition performance in all types of noises at all SNRs than middle-aged adults. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in real-life background noise was affected by the type of noise, SNR, and age. The results suggest that the frequency distribution, amplitude fluctuation, informational masking, and cognition may be important underlying factors determining speech recognition performance in noise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4491949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Audiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44919492015-07-16 Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing Lee, Ji Young Lee, Jin Tae Heo, Hye Jeong Choi, Chul-Hee Choi, Seong Hee Lee, Kyungjae J Audiol Otol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People usually converse in real-life background noise. They experience more difficulty understanding speech in noise than in a quiet environment. The present study investigated how speech recognition in real-life background noise is affected by the type of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen young adults and fifteen middle-aged adults with normal hearing participated in the present study. Three types of noise [subway noise, vacuum noise, and multi-talker babble (MTB)] were presented via a loudspeaker at three SNRs of 5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Speech recognition was analyzed using the word recognition score. RESULTS: 1) Speech recognition in subway noise was the greatest in comparison to vacuum noise and MTB, 2) at the SNR of -5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than vacuum noise and in vacuum noise than MTB while at the SNRs of 0 and 5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB, 3) speech recognition decreased as the SNR decreased, and 4) young adults showed better speech recognition performance in all types of noises at all SNRs than middle-aged adults. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition in real-life background noise was affected by the type of noise, SNR, and age. The results suggest that the frequency distribution, amplitude fluctuation, informational masking, and cognition may be important underlying factors determining speech recognition performance in noise. The Korean Audiological Society 2015-04 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4491949/ /pubmed/26185790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Audiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Ji Young Lee, Jin Tae Heo, Hye Jeong Choi, Chul-Hee Choi, Seong Hee Lee, Kyungjae Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title | Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title_full | Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title_fullStr | Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title_full_unstemmed | Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title_short | Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing |
title_sort | speech recognition in real-life background noise by young and middle-aged adults with normal hearing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185790 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejiyoung speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing AT leejintae speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing AT heohyejeong speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing AT choichulhee speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing AT choiseonghee speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing AT leekyungjae speechrecognitioninreallifebackgroundnoisebyyoungandmiddleagedadultswithnormalhearing |