Cargando…

Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Poor appetite could be indicative of protein energy wasting (PEW) and experts recommend assessing appetite in dialysis patients. Our study aims to determine the relationship between PEW and appetite in haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: HD patients (n=205) self-rated their appetite on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahathevan, Sharmela, Se, Chee Hee, Ng, See Hoe, Chinna, Karuthan, Harvinder, Gilcharan Singh, Chee, Winnie Siew Swee, Goh, Bak Leong, Gafor, Halim A., Bavanandan, Sunita, Ahmad, Ghazali, Karupaiah, Tilakavati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0073-x
_version_ 1782379719271907328
author Sahathevan, Sharmela
Se, Chee Hee
Ng, See Hoe
Chinna, Karuthan
Harvinder, Gilcharan Singh
Chee, Winnie Siew Swee
Goh, Bak Leong
Gafor, Halim A.
Bavanandan, Sunita
Ahmad, Ghazali
Karupaiah, Tilakavati
author_facet Sahathevan, Sharmela
Se, Chee Hee
Ng, See Hoe
Chinna, Karuthan
Harvinder, Gilcharan Singh
Chee, Winnie Siew Swee
Goh, Bak Leong
Gafor, Halim A.
Bavanandan, Sunita
Ahmad, Ghazali
Karupaiah, Tilakavati
author_sort Sahathevan, Sharmela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor appetite could be indicative of protein energy wasting (PEW) and experts recommend assessing appetite in dialysis patients. Our study aims to determine the relationship between PEW and appetite in haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: HD patients (n=205) self-rated their appetite on a scale of 1 to 5 as very good (1), good (2), fair (3), poor (4) or very poor (5). Nutritional markers were compared against appetite ratings. Using logistic regression analysis associations between dichotomized appetite with PEW diagnosis were determined as per the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria and alternate objective measures. Data was adjusted for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Poorer appetite ratings were significantly associated with lower income (P = 0.021), lower measurements (P < 0.05) for mid-arm muscle circumference, mid-arm muscle area and lean tissue mass (LTM), serum urea (P = 0.007) and creatinine (P = 0.005). The highest hsCRP (P = 0.016) levels occurred in patients reporting the poorest appetite. Serum albumin did not differ significantly across appetite ratings. Poor oral intake represented by underreporting (EI/BMR < 1.2) was evident for all appetite ratings. PEW was prevalent irrespective of appetite ratings (very good: 17.6 %, good: 40.2 %, fair: 42.3 % and poor: 83.3 %). After dichotomizing appetite ratings into normal and diminished categories, there was a marginal positive association between diminished appetite and overall PEW diagnosis (OR(adj): 1.71; 95 % CI: 0.94–3.10, P = 0.079). Amongst individual ISRNM criteria, only BMI <23 kg/m2 was positively associated with diminished appetite (OR(adj): 2.17; 95 % CI: 1.18–3.99). However, patients reporting diminished appetite were more likely to have lower LTM (OR(adj): 2.86; 95 % CI: 1.31–6.24) and fat mass (OR(adj): 1.91; 95 % CI: 1.03–3.53), lower levels of serum urea (OR(adj): 2.74; 95 % CI: 1.49–5.06) and creatinine (OR(adj): 1.99; 95 % CI: 1.01–3.92), higher Dialysis Malnutrition Score (OR(adj): 2.75; 95 % CI: 1.50–5.03), Malnutrition Inflammation Score (OR(adj): 2.15; 95 % CI: 1.17–3.94), and poorer physical (OR(adj): 3.49; 95 % CI: 1.89–6.47) and mental (OR(adj): 5.75; 95 % CI: 3.02–10.95) scores. CONCLUSIONS: A graded but non-significant increase in the proportion of PEW patients occurred as appetite became poorer. However, after dichotomization, a positive but marginally significant association was observed between diminished appetite and PEW diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0073-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4492004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44920042015-07-07 Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study Sahathevan, Sharmela Se, Chee Hee Ng, See Hoe Chinna, Karuthan Harvinder, Gilcharan Singh Chee, Winnie Siew Swee Goh, Bak Leong Gafor, Halim A. Bavanandan, Sunita Ahmad, Ghazali Karupaiah, Tilakavati BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Poor appetite could be indicative of protein energy wasting (PEW) and experts recommend assessing appetite in dialysis patients. Our study aims to determine the relationship between PEW and appetite in haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: HD patients (n=205) self-rated their appetite on a scale of 1 to 5 as very good (1), good (2), fair (3), poor (4) or very poor (5). Nutritional markers were compared against appetite ratings. Using logistic regression analysis associations between dichotomized appetite with PEW diagnosis were determined as per the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria and alternate objective measures. Data was adjusted for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Poorer appetite ratings were significantly associated with lower income (P = 0.021), lower measurements (P < 0.05) for mid-arm muscle circumference, mid-arm muscle area and lean tissue mass (LTM), serum urea (P = 0.007) and creatinine (P = 0.005). The highest hsCRP (P = 0.016) levels occurred in patients reporting the poorest appetite. Serum albumin did not differ significantly across appetite ratings. Poor oral intake represented by underreporting (EI/BMR < 1.2) was evident for all appetite ratings. PEW was prevalent irrespective of appetite ratings (very good: 17.6 %, good: 40.2 %, fair: 42.3 % and poor: 83.3 %). After dichotomizing appetite ratings into normal and diminished categories, there was a marginal positive association between diminished appetite and overall PEW diagnosis (OR(adj): 1.71; 95 % CI: 0.94–3.10, P = 0.079). Amongst individual ISRNM criteria, only BMI <23 kg/m2 was positively associated with diminished appetite (OR(adj): 2.17; 95 % CI: 1.18–3.99). However, patients reporting diminished appetite were more likely to have lower LTM (OR(adj): 2.86; 95 % CI: 1.31–6.24) and fat mass (OR(adj): 1.91; 95 % CI: 1.03–3.53), lower levels of serum urea (OR(adj): 2.74; 95 % CI: 1.49–5.06) and creatinine (OR(adj): 1.99; 95 % CI: 1.01–3.92), higher Dialysis Malnutrition Score (OR(adj): 2.75; 95 % CI: 1.50–5.03), Malnutrition Inflammation Score (OR(adj): 2.15; 95 % CI: 1.17–3.94), and poorer physical (OR(adj): 3.49; 95 % CI: 1.89–6.47) and mental (OR(adj): 5.75; 95 % CI: 3.02–10.95) scores. CONCLUSIONS: A graded but non-significant increase in the proportion of PEW patients occurred as appetite became poorer. However, after dichotomization, a positive but marginally significant association was observed between diminished appetite and PEW diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0073-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4492004/ /pubmed/26149396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0073-x Text en © Sahathevan et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sahathevan, Sharmela
Se, Chee Hee
Ng, See Hoe
Chinna, Karuthan
Harvinder, Gilcharan Singh
Chee, Winnie Siew Swee
Goh, Bak Leong
Gafor, Halim A.
Bavanandan, Sunita
Ahmad, Ghazali
Karupaiah, Tilakavati
Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title_full Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title_short Assessing protein energy wasting in a Malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
title_sort assessing protein energy wasting in a malaysian haemodialysis population using self-reported appetite rating: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0073-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sahathevansharmela assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT secheehee assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT ngseehoe assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT chinnakaruthan assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT harvindergilcharansingh assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT cheewinniesiewswee assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT gohbakleong assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaforhalima assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT bavanandansunita assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT ahmadghazali assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy
AT karupaiahtilakavati assessingproteinenergywastinginamalaysianhaemodialysispopulationusingselfreportedappetiteratingacrosssectionalstudy