Cargando…
The unifrac significance test is sensitive to tree topology
Long et al. (BMC Bioinformatics 2014, 15(1):278) describe a “discrepancy” in using UniFrac to assess statistical significance of community differences. Specifically, they find that weighted UniFrac results differ between input trees where (a) replicate sequences each have their own tip, or (b) all r...
Autores principales: | Lozupone, Catherine A., Knight, Rob |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0640-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
UniFrac – An online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context
por: Lozupone, Catherine, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Fast UniFrac: Facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data
por: Hamady, Micah, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Equivalent input produces different output in the UniFrac significance test
por: Long, Jeffrey R, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Expanding the UniFrac Toolbox
por: Wong, Ruth G., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Optimizing UniFrac with OpenACC Yields Greater Than One Thousand Times Speed Increase
por: Sfiligoi, Igor, et al.
Publicado: (2022)