Cargando…

Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists

BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Klaus, Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup, Laursen, Christian Borbjerg, Brabrand, Mikkel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1
_version_ 1782379733109964800
author Nielsen, Klaus
Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Brabrand, Mikkel
author_facet Nielsen, Klaus
Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Brabrand, Mikkel
author_sort Nielsen, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency ultrasound. We also wanted to give an idea of how many and which physicians have adopted ultrasound as a diagnostic tool so far. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter survey that included all physician staffed EDs in Denmark. An Internet based questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to all heads of department. Those departments who responded that ultrasound was available in their department were included in the second part of the study where all physicians working in the ED were contacted and asked to complete a second questionnaire. RESULTS: All 28 eligible EDs participated in the first part of the study (Response rate: 100 %). 25 EDs (89 %, 95 % CI: 85-93) had ultrasound equipment available. Questionnaires were distributed to 1,872 physicians in these departments and 561 responded (Response rate: 30 %, 95 % CI: 28-32). Overall 257 (46 %, 95 % CI: 42-50) were users of emergency ultrasound and 304 were non-users (54 %, 95 % CI: 50-58). The largest group with 146 respondents (25 %, 95 % CI: 21-29) were anaesthetists with merely consult duty in the ED. When looking exclusively on physicians with on-call duty in the ED, thus excluding anaesthetists, only 146 (35 %, 95 % CI: 30-40) were users of ultrasound while 269 (65 %, 95 % CI: 60-70) were non-users. There was a considerable difference regarding age, level of training, and medical specialty between users and non-users. Users were mainly anaesthetists and attending physicians from other departments. The majority of non-users were young physicians with on call duty in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that although almost all Danish EDs have ultrasound equipment available, few physicians working in the ED seem to have adopted the tool. Emergency Ultrasound is mainly performed by specialists who are summoned to the ED in case of severe acute illness and not by those physicians who comprise the backbone of the ED around the clock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4492065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44920652015-07-07 Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists Nielsen, Klaus Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Brabrand, Mikkel Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency ultrasound. We also wanted to give an idea of how many and which physicians have adopted ultrasound as a diagnostic tool so far. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter survey that included all physician staffed EDs in Denmark. An Internet based questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to all heads of department. Those departments who responded that ultrasound was available in their department were included in the second part of the study where all physicians working in the ED were contacted and asked to complete a second questionnaire. RESULTS: All 28 eligible EDs participated in the first part of the study (Response rate: 100 %). 25 EDs (89 %, 95 % CI: 85-93) had ultrasound equipment available. Questionnaires were distributed to 1,872 physicians in these departments and 561 responded (Response rate: 30 %, 95 % CI: 28-32). Overall 257 (46 %, 95 % CI: 42-50) were users of emergency ultrasound and 304 were non-users (54 %, 95 % CI: 50-58). The largest group with 146 respondents (25 %, 95 % CI: 21-29) were anaesthetists with merely consult duty in the ED. When looking exclusively on physicians with on-call duty in the ED, thus excluding anaesthetists, only 146 (35 %, 95 % CI: 30-40) were users of ultrasound while 269 (65 %, 95 % CI: 60-70) were non-users. There was a considerable difference regarding age, level of training, and medical specialty between users and non-users. Users were mainly anaesthetists and attending physicians from other departments. The majority of non-users were young physicians with on call duty in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that although almost all Danish EDs have ultrasound equipment available, few physicians working in the ED seem to have adopted the tool. Emergency Ultrasound is mainly performed by specialists who are summoned to the ED in case of severe acute illness and not by those physicians who comprise the backbone of the ED around the clock. BioMed Central 2015-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4492065/ /pubmed/26149454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1 Text en © Nielsen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nielsen, Klaus
Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Brabrand, Mikkel
Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title_full Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title_fullStr Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title_full_unstemmed Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title_short Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
title_sort physicians using ultrasound in danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenklaus physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists
AT lauridsenjohnnyrenemeilstrup physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists
AT laursenchristianborbjerg physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists
AT brabrandmikkel physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists