Cargando…
Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists
BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency u...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1 |
_version_ | 1782379733109964800 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Klaus Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Brabrand, Mikkel |
author_facet | Nielsen, Klaus Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Brabrand, Mikkel |
author_sort | Nielsen, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency ultrasound. We also wanted to give an idea of how many and which physicians have adopted ultrasound as a diagnostic tool so far. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter survey that included all physician staffed EDs in Denmark. An Internet based questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to all heads of department. Those departments who responded that ultrasound was available in their department were included in the second part of the study where all physicians working in the ED were contacted and asked to complete a second questionnaire. RESULTS: All 28 eligible EDs participated in the first part of the study (Response rate: 100 %). 25 EDs (89 %, 95 % CI: 85-93) had ultrasound equipment available. Questionnaires were distributed to 1,872 physicians in these departments and 561 responded (Response rate: 30 %, 95 % CI: 28-32). Overall 257 (46 %, 95 % CI: 42-50) were users of emergency ultrasound and 304 were non-users (54 %, 95 % CI: 50-58). The largest group with 146 respondents (25 %, 95 % CI: 21-29) were anaesthetists with merely consult duty in the ED. When looking exclusively on physicians with on-call duty in the ED, thus excluding anaesthetists, only 146 (35 %, 95 % CI: 30-40) were users of ultrasound while 269 (65 %, 95 % CI: 60-70) were non-users. There was a considerable difference regarding age, level of training, and medical specialty between users and non-users. Users were mainly anaesthetists and attending physicians from other departments. The majority of non-users were young physicians with on call duty in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that although almost all Danish EDs have ultrasound equipment available, few physicians working in the ED seem to have adopted the tool. Emergency Ultrasound is mainly performed by specialists who are summoned to the ED in case of severe acute illness and not by those physicians who comprise the backbone of the ED around the clock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4492065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44920652015-07-07 Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists Nielsen, Klaus Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Brabrand, Mikkel Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Emergency ultrasound is a relatively new diagnostic discipline. It is used as an extension of the clinical examination and is ideal in the setting of acute illness. The objective of this study was to investigate how many Emergency Departments (EDs) in Denmark have implemented emergency ultrasound. We also wanted to give an idea of how many and which physicians have adopted ultrasound as a diagnostic tool so far. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter survey that included all physician staffed EDs in Denmark. An Internet based questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to all heads of department. Those departments who responded that ultrasound was available in their department were included in the second part of the study where all physicians working in the ED were contacted and asked to complete a second questionnaire. RESULTS: All 28 eligible EDs participated in the first part of the study (Response rate: 100 %). 25 EDs (89 %, 95 % CI: 85-93) had ultrasound equipment available. Questionnaires were distributed to 1,872 physicians in these departments and 561 responded (Response rate: 30 %, 95 % CI: 28-32). Overall 257 (46 %, 95 % CI: 42-50) were users of emergency ultrasound and 304 were non-users (54 %, 95 % CI: 50-58). The largest group with 146 respondents (25 %, 95 % CI: 21-29) were anaesthetists with merely consult duty in the ED. When looking exclusively on physicians with on-call duty in the ED, thus excluding anaesthetists, only 146 (35 %, 95 % CI: 30-40) were users of ultrasound while 269 (65 %, 95 % CI: 60-70) were non-users. There was a considerable difference regarding age, level of training, and medical specialty between users and non-users. Users were mainly anaesthetists and attending physicians from other departments. The majority of non-users were young physicians with on call duty in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that although almost all Danish EDs have ultrasound equipment available, few physicians working in the ED seem to have adopted the tool. Emergency Ultrasound is mainly performed by specialists who are summoned to the ED in case of severe acute illness and not by those physicians who comprise the backbone of the ED around the clock. BioMed Central 2015-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4492065/ /pubmed/26149454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1 Text en © Nielsen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nielsen, Klaus Lauridsen, Johnny Rene Meilstrup Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Brabrand, Mikkel Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title | Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title_full | Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title_fullStr | Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title_full_unstemmed | Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title_short | Physicians using ultrasound in Danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
title_sort | physicians using ultrasound in danish emergency departments are mostly summoned specialists |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0131-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenklaus physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists AT lauridsenjohnnyrenemeilstrup physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists AT laursenchristianborbjerg physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists AT brabrandmikkel physiciansusingultrasoundindanishemergencydepartmentsaremostlysummonedspecialists |