Cargando…

Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens

BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolc, Anna, Zhao, Honghua H., Arango, Jesus, Settar, Petek, Fulton, Janet E., O’Sullivan, Neil P., Preisinger, Rudolf, Stricker, Chris, Habier, David, Fernando, Rohan L., Garrick, Dorian J., Lamont, Susan J., Dekkers, Jack C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
_version_ 1782379737193119744
author Wolc, Anna
Zhao, Honghua H.
Arango, Jesus
Settar, Petek
Fulton, Janet E.
O’Sullivan, Neil P.
Preisinger, Rudolf
Stricker, Chris
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L.
Garrick, Dorian J.
Lamont, Susan J.
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
author_facet Wolc, Anna
Zhao, Honghua H.
Arango, Jesus
Settar, Petek
Fulton, Janet E.
O’Sullivan, Neil P.
Preisinger, Rudolf
Stricker, Chris
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L.
Garrick, Dorian J.
Lamont, Susan J.
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
author_sort Wolc, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. METHODS: In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. RESULTS: Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4492088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44920882015-07-07 Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens Wolc, Anna Zhao, Honghua H. Arango, Jesus Settar, Petek Fulton, Janet E. O’Sullivan, Neil P. Preisinger, Rudolf Stricker, Chris Habier, David Fernando, Rohan L. Garrick, Dorian J. Lamont, Susan J. Dekkers, Jack C. M. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken. METHODS: In the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production. RESULTS: Birds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens. BioMed Central 2015-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4492088/ /pubmed/26149977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5 Text en © Wolc et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wolc, Anna
Zhao, Honghua H.
Arango, Jesus
Settar, Petek
Fulton, Janet E.
O’Sullivan, Neil P.
Preisinger, Rudolf
Stricker, Chris
Habier, David
Fernando, Rohan L.
Garrick, Dorian J.
Lamont, Susan J.
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title_full Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title_fullStr Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title_full_unstemmed Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title_short Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
title_sort response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26149977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wolcanna responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT zhaohonghuah responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT arangojesus responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT settarpetek responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT fultonjanete responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT osullivanneilp responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT preisingerrudolf responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT strickerchris responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT habierdavid responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT fernandorohanl responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT garrickdorianj responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT lamontsusanj responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens
AT dekkersjackcm responseandinbreedingfromagenomicselectionexperimentinlayerchickens