Cargando…
Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714 |
_version_ | 1782379796492189696 |
---|---|
author | Friedrich, Ralf P Janko, Christina Poettler, Marina Tripal, Philipp Zaloga, Jan Cicha, Iwona Dürr, Stephan Nowak, Johannes Odenbach, Stefan Slabu, Ioana Liebl, Maik Trahms, Lutz Stapf, Marcus Hilger, Ingrid Lyer, Stefan Alexiou, Christoph |
author_facet | Friedrich, Ralf P Janko, Christina Poettler, Marina Tripal, Philipp Zaloga, Jan Cicha, Iwona Dürr, Stephan Nowak, Johannes Odenbach, Stefan Slabu, Ioana Liebl, Maik Trahms, Lutz Stapf, Marcus Hilger, Ingrid Lyer, Stefan Alexiou, Christoph |
author_sort | Friedrich, Ralf P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration-dependent nanoparticle-mediated toxicity, the exact quantification of intracellular SPIONs by reliable methods is of great importance. In the present study, we compared three different SPION quantification methods (ultraviolet spectrophotometry, magnetic particle spectroscopy, atomic adsorption spectroscopy) and discussed the shortcomings and advantages of each method. Moreover, we used those results to evaluate the possibility to use flow cytometric technique to determine the cellular SPION content. For this purpose, we correlated the side scatter data received from flow cytometry with the actual cellular SPION amount. We showed that flow cytometry provides a rapid and reliable method to assess the cellular SPION content. Our data also demonstrate that internalization of iron oxide nanoparticles in human umbilical vein endothelial cells is strongly dependent to the SPION type and results in a dose-dependent increase of toxicity. Thus, treatment with lauric acid-coated SPIONs (SEON(LA)) resulted in a significant increase in the intensity of side scatter and toxicity, whereas SEON(LA) with an additional protein corona formed by bovine serum albumin (SEON(LA-BSA)) and commercially available Rienso(®) particles showed only a minimal increase in both side scatter intensity and cellular toxicity. The increase in side scatter was in accordance with the measurements for SPION content by the atomic adsorption spectroscopy reference method. In summary, our data show that flow cytometry analysis can be used for estimation of uptake of SPIONs by mammalian cells and provides a fast tool for scientists to evaluate the safety of nanoparticle products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4492632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44926322015-07-13 Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods Friedrich, Ralf P Janko, Christina Poettler, Marina Tripal, Philipp Zaloga, Jan Cicha, Iwona Dürr, Stephan Nowak, Johannes Odenbach, Stefan Slabu, Ioana Liebl, Maik Trahms, Lutz Stapf, Marcus Hilger, Ingrid Lyer, Stefan Alexiou, Christoph Int J Nanomedicine Original Research Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration-dependent nanoparticle-mediated toxicity, the exact quantification of intracellular SPIONs by reliable methods is of great importance. In the present study, we compared three different SPION quantification methods (ultraviolet spectrophotometry, magnetic particle spectroscopy, atomic adsorption spectroscopy) and discussed the shortcomings and advantages of each method. Moreover, we used those results to evaluate the possibility to use flow cytometric technique to determine the cellular SPION content. For this purpose, we correlated the side scatter data received from flow cytometry with the actual cellular SPION amount. We showed that flow cytometry provides a rapid and reliable method to assess the cellular SPION content. Our data also demonstrate that internalization of iron oxide nanoparticles in human umbilical vein endothelial cells is strongly dependent to the SPION type and results in a dose-dependent increase of toxicity. Thus, treatment with lauric acid-coated SPIONs (SEON(LA)) resulted in a significant increase in the intensity of side scatter and toxicity, whereas SEON(LA) with an additional protein corona formed by bovine serum albumin (SEON(LA-BSA)) and commercially available Rienso(®) particles showed only a minimal increase in both side scatter intensity and cellular toxicity. The increase in side scatter was in accordance with the measurements for SPION content by the atomic adsorption spectroscopy reference method. In summary, our data show that flow cytometry analysis can be used for estimation of uptake of SPIONs by mammalian cells and provides a fast tool for scientists to evaluate the safety of nanoparticle products. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4492632/ /pubmed/26170658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714 Text en © 2015 Friedrich et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Friedrich, Ralf P Janko, Christina Poettler, Marina Tripal, Philipp Zaloga, Jan Cicha, Iwona Dürr, Stephan Nowak, Johannes Odenbach, Stefan Slabu, Ioana Liebl, Maik Trahms, Lutz Stapf, Marcus Hilger, Ingrid Lyer, Stefan Alexiou, Christoph Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title | Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title_full | Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title_fullStr | Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title_short | Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
title_sort | flow cytometry for intracellular spion quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friedrichralfp flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT jankochristina flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT poettlermarina flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT tripalphilipp flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT zalogajan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT cichaiwona flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT durrstephan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT nowakjohannes flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT odenbachstefan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT slabuioana flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT lieblmaik flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT trahmslutz flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT stapfmarcus flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT hilgeringrid flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT lyerstefan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods AT alexiouchristoph flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods |