Cargando…

Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods

Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedrich, Ralf P, Janko, Christina, Poettler, Marina, Tripal, Philipp, Zaloga, Jan, Cicha, Iwona, Dürr, Stephan, Nowak, Johannes, Odenbach, Stefan, Slabu, Ioana, Liebl, Maik, Trahms, Lutz, Stapf, Marcus, Hilger, Ingrid, Lyer, Stefan, Alexiou, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714
_version_ 1782379796492189696
author Friedrich, Ralf P
Janko, Christina
Poettler, Marina
Tripal, Philipp
Zaloga, Jan
Cicha, Iwona
Dürr, Stephan
Nowak, Johannes
Odenbach, Stefan
Slabu, Ioana
Liebl, Maik
Trahms, Lutz
Stapf, Marcus
Hilger, Ingrid
Lyer, Stefan
Alexiou, Christoph
author_facet Friedrich, Ralf P
Janko, Christina
Poettler, Marina
Tripal, Philipp
Zaloga, Jan
Cicha, Iwona
Dürr, Stephan
Nowak, Johannes
Odenbach, Stefan
Slabu, Ioana
Liebl, Maik
Trahms, Lutz
Stapf, Marcus
Hilger, Ingrid
Lyer, Stefan
Alexiou, Christoph
author_sort Friedrich, Ralf P
collection PubMed
description Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration-dependent nanoparticle-mediated toxicity, the exact quantification of intracellular SPIONs by reliable methods is of great importance. In the present study, we compared three different SPION quantification methods (ultraviolet spectrophotometry, magnetic particle spectroscopy, atomic adsorption spectroscopy) and discussed the shortcomings and advantages of each method. Moreover, we used those results to evaluate the possibility to use flow cytometric technique to determine the cellular SPION content. For this purpose, we correlated the side scatter data received from flow cytometry with the actual cellular SPION amount. We showed that flow cytometry provides a rapid and reliable method to assess the cellular SPION content. Our data also demonstrate that internalization of iron oxide nanoparticles in human umbilical vein endothelial cells is strongly dependent to the SPION type and results in a dose-dependent increase of toxicity. Thus, treatment with lauric acid-coated SPIONs (SEON(LA)) resulted in a significant increase in the intensity of side scatter and toxicity, whereas SEON(LA) with an additional protein corona formed by bovine serum albumin (SEON(LA-BSA)) and commercially available Rienso(®) particles showed only a minimal increase in both side scatter intensity and cellular toxicity. The increase in side scatter was in accordance with the measurements for SPION content by the atomic adsorption spectroscopy reference method. In summary, our data show that flow cytometry analysis can be used for estimation of uptake of SPIONs by mammalian cells and provides a fast tool for scientists to evaluate the safety of nanoparticle products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4492632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44926322015-07-13 Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods Friedrich, Ralf P Janko, Christina Poettler, Marina Tripal, Philipp Zaloga, Jan Cicha, Iwona Dürr, Stephan Nowak, Johannes Odenbach, Stefan Slabu, Ioana Liebl, Maik Trahms, Lutz Stapf, Marcus Hilger, Ingrid Lyer, Stefan Alexiou, Christoph Int J Nanomedicine Original Research Due to their special physicochemical properties, iron nanoparticles offer new promising possibilities for biomedical applications. For bench to bedside translation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), safety issues have to be comprehensively clarified. To understand concentration-dependent nanoparticle-mediated toxicity, the exact quantification of intracellular SPIONs by reliable methods is of great importance. In the present study, we compared three different SPION quantification methods (ultraviolet spectrophotometry, magnetic particle spectroscopy, atomic adsorption spectroscopy) and discussed the shortcomings and advantages of each method. Moreover, we used those results to evaluate the possibility to use flow cytometric technique to determine the cellular SPION content. For this purpose, we correlated the side scatter data received from flow cytometry with the actual cellular SPION amount. We showed that flow cytometry provides a rapid and reliable method to assess the cellular SPION content. Our data also demonstrate that internalization of iron oxide nanoparticles in human umbilical vein endothelial cells is strongly dependent to the SPION type and results in a dose-dependent increase of toxicity. Thus, treatment with lauric acid-coated SPIONs (SEON(LA)) resulted in a significant increase in the intensity of side scatter and toxicity, whereas SEON(LA) with an additional protein corona formed by bovine serum albumin (SEON(LA-BSA)) and commercially available Rienso(®) particles showed only a minimal increase in both side scatter intensity and cellular toxicity. The increase in side scatter was in accordance with the measurements for SPION content by the atomic adsorption spectroscopy reference method. In summary, our data show that flow cytometry analysis can be used for estimation of uptake of SPIONs by mammalian cells and provides a fast tool for scientists to evaluate the safety of nanoparticle products. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4492632/ /pubmed/26170658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714 Text en © 2015 Friedrich et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Friedrich, Ralf P
Janko, Christina
Poettler, Marina
Tripal, Philipp
Zaloga, Jan
Cicha, Iwona
Dürr, Stephan
Nowak, Johannes
Odenbach, Stefan
Slabu, Ioana
Liebl, Maik
Trahms, Lutz
Stapf, Marcus
Hilger, Ingrid
Lyer, Stefan
Alexiou, Christoph
Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title_full Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title_fullStr Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title_full_unstemmed Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title_short Flow cytometry for intracellular SPION quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
title_sort flow cytometry for intracellular spion quantification: specificity and sensitivity in comparison with spectroscopic methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S82714
work_keys_str_mv AT friedrichralfp flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT jankochristina flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT poettlermarina flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT tripalphilipp flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT zalogajan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT cichaiwona flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT durrstephan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT nowakjohannes flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT odenbachstefan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT slabuioana flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT lieblmaik flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT trahmslutz flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT stapfmarcus flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT hilgeringrid flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT lyerstefan flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods
AT alexiouchristoph flowcytometryforintracellularspionquantificationspecificityandsensitivityincomparisonwithspectroscopicmethods