Cargando…

Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chuan, Zhang, Lingli, Liu, Xinghui, Zhang, Li, Zeng, Zhiyou, Li, Lin, Liu, Guanjian, Jiang, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434
_version_ 1782379824401088512
author Zhang, Chuan
Zhang, Lingli
Liu, Xinghui
Zhang, Li
Zeng, Zhiyou
Li, Lin
Liu, Guanjian
Jiang, Hong
author_facet Zhang, Chuan
Zhang, Lingli
Liu, Xinghui
Zhang, Li
Zeng, Zhiyou
Li, Lin
Liu, Guanjian
Jiang, Hong
author_sort Zhang, Chuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. CONCLUSION: For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4492889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44928892015-07-15 Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Lingli Liu, Xinghui Zhang, Li Zeng, Zhiyou Li, Lin Liu, Guanjian Jiang, Hong PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. CONCLUSION: For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853 Public Library of Science 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4492889/ /pubmed/26148063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434 Text en © 2015 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Chuan
Zhang, Lingli
Liu, Xinghui
Zhang, Li
Zeng, Zhiyou
Li, Lin
Liu, Guanjian
Jiang, Hong
Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title_full Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title_short Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
title_sort timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery: a multi-center randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchuan timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglingli timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT liuxinghui timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT zhangli timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT zengzhiyou timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT lilin timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT liuguanjian timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis
AT jianghong timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis