Cargando…
Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434 |
_version_ | 1782379824401088512 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Lingli Liu, Xinghui Zhang, Li Zeng, Zhiyou Li, Lin Liu, Guanjian Jiang, Hong |
author_facet | Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Lingli Liu, Xinghui Zhang, Li Zeng, Zhiyou Li, Lin Liu, Guanjian Jiang, Hong |
author_sort | Zhang, Chuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. CONCLUSION: For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4492889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44928892015-07-15 Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Lingli Liu, Xinghui Zhang, Li Zeng, Zhiyou Li, Lin Liu, Guanjian Jiang, Hong PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. CONCLUSION: For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853 Public Library of Science 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4492889/ /pubmed/26148063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434 Text en © 2015 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Lingli Liu, Xinghui Zhang, Li Zeng, Zhiyou Li, Lin Liu, Guanjian Jiang, Hong Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title | Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery: a multi-center randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchuan timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT zhanglingli timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT liuxinghui timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT zhangli timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT zengzhiyou timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT lilin timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT liuguanjian timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis AT jianghong timingofantibioticprophylaxisinelectivecaesareandeliveryamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialandmetaanalysis |