Cargando…

Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners

Foot morphology and function has received increasing attention from both biomechanics researchers and footwear manufacturers. In this study, 168 habitually unshod runners (90 males whose age, weight & height were 23±2.4years, 66±7.1kg & 1.68±0.13m and 78 females whose age, weight & heigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Yang, Mei, Qichang, Fernandez, Justin, Li, Zhiyong, Feng, Neng, Gu, Yaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131385
_version_ 1782379850069180416
author Shu, Yang
Mei, Qichang
Fernandez, Justin
Li, Zhiyong
Feng, Neng
Gu, Yaodong
author_facet Shu, Yang
Mei, Qichang
Fernandez, Justin
Li, Zhiyong
Feng, Neng
Gu, Yaodong
author_sort Shu, Yang
collection PubMed
description Foot morphology and function has received increasing attention from both biomechanics researchers and footwear manufacturers. In this study, 168 habitually unshod runners (90 males whose age, weight & height were 23±2.4years, 66±7.1kg & 1.68±0.13m and 78 females whose age, weight & height were 22±1.8years, 55±4.7kg & 1.6±0.11m) (Indians) and 196 shod runners (130 males whose age, weight & height were 24±2.6years, 66±8.2kg & 1.72±0.18m and 66 females whose age, weight & height were 23±1.5years, 54±5.6kg & 1.62±0.15m)(Chinese) participated in a foot scanning test using the easy-foot-scan (a three-dimensional foot scanning system) to obtain 3D foot surface data and 2D footprint imaging. Foot length, foot width, hallux angle and minimal distance from hallux to second toe were calculated to analyze foot morphological differences. This study found that significant differences exist between groups (shod Chinese and unshod Indians) for foot length (female p = 0.001), width (female p = 0.001), hallux angle (male and female p = 0.001) and the minimal distance (male and female p = 0.001) from hallux to second toe. This study suggests that significant differences in morphology between different ethnicities could be considered for future investigation of locomotion biomechanics characteristics between ethnicities and inform last shape and design so as to reduce injury risks and poor performance from mal-fit shoes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44930342015-07-15 Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners Shu, Yang Mei, Qichang Fernandez, Justin Li, Zhiyong Feng, Neng Gu, Yaodong PLoS One Research Article Foot morphology and function has received increasing attention from both biomechanics researchers and footwear manufacturers. In this study, 168 habitually unshod runners (90 males whose age, weight & height were 23±2.4years, 66±7.1kg & 1.68±0.13m and 78 females whose age, weight & height were 22±1.8years, 55±4.7kg & 1.6±0.11m) (Indians) and 196 shod runners (130 males whose age, weight & height were 24±2.6years, 66±8.2kg & 1.72±0.18m and 66 females whose age, weight & height were 23±1.5years, 54±5.6kg & 1.62±0.15m)(Chinese) participated in a foot scanning test using the easy-foot-scan (a three-dimensional foot scanning system) to obtain 3D foot surface data and 2D footprint imaging. Foot length, foot width, hallux angle and minimal distance from hallux to second toe were calculated to analyze foot morphological differences. This study found that significant differences exist between groups (shod Chinese and unshod Indians) for foot length (female p = 0.001), width (female p = 0.001), hallux angle (male and female p = 0.001) and the minimal distance (male and female p = 0.001) from hallux to second toe. This study suggests that significant differences in morphology between different ethnicities could be considered for future investigation of locomotion biomechanics characteristics between ethnicities and inform last shape and design so as to reduce injury risks and poor performance from mal-fit shoes. Public Library of Science 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4493034/ /pubmed/26148059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131385 Text en © 2015 Shu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shu, Yang
Mei, Qichang
Fernandez, Justin
Li, Zhiyong
Feng, Neng
Gu, Yaodong
Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title_full Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title_fullStr Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title_full_unstemmed Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title_short Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners
title_sort foot morphological difference between habitually shod and unshod runners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131385
work_keys_str_mv AT shuyang footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners
AT meiqichang footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners
AT fernandezjustin footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners
AT lizhiyong footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners
AT fengneng footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners
AT guyaodong footmorphologicaldifferencebetweenhabituallyshodandunshodrunners