Cargando…

The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection

Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hongjun, Zhou, Huangkai, Wu, Yongsheng, Li, Xiao, Zhao, Jing, Zuo, Tao, Zhang, Xuan, Zhang, Yongzhong, Liu, Sisi, Shen, Yaou, Lin, Haijian, Zhang, Zhiming, Huang, Kaijian, Lübberstedt, Thomas, Pan, Guangtang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379
_version_ 1782379869949132800
author Liu, Hongjun
Zhou, Huangkai
Wu, Yongsheng
Li, Xiao
Zhao, Jing
Zuo, Tao
Zhang, Xuan
Zhang, Yongzhong
Liu, Sisi
Shen, Yaou
Lin, Haijian
Zhang, Zhiming
Huang, Kaijian
Lübberstedt, Thomas
Pan, Guangtang
author_facet Liu, Hongjun
Zhou, Huangkai
Wu, Yongsheng
Li, Xiao
Zhao, Jing
Zuo, Tao
Zhang, Xuan
Zhang, Yongzhong
Liu, Sisi
Shen, Yaou
Lin, Haijian
Zhang, Zhiming
Huang, Kaijian
Lübberstedt, Thomas
Pan, Guangtang
author_sort Liu, Hongjun
collection PubMed
description Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was further discussed. This study is based on experimental data of two populations derived from the same two founder lines (B73, Mo17). Two populations were genotyped with different marker sets at different density: IBM Syn4 and IBM Syn10. A high-density marker set in Syn10 was imputed into the Syn4 population with low marker density. Seven different prediction scenarios were carried out with a random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model. The result showed that the closer the real genetic relationship between training and validation population, the fewer markers were required to reach a good prediction accuracy. Taken the short-term cost for consideration, relationship information is more valuable than LD information. Meanwhile, the result indicated that accuracies based on high LD between QTL and markers were more stable over generations, thus LD information would provide more robust prediction capacity in practical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44931242015-07-15 The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection Liu, Hongjun Zhou, Huangkai Wu, Yongsheng Li, Xiao Zhao, Jing Zuo, Tao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yongzhong Liu, Sisi Shen, Yaou Lin, Haijian Zhang, Zhiming Huang, Kaijian Lübberstedt, Thomas Pan, Guangtang PLoS One Research Article Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was further discussed. This study is based on experimental data of two populations derived from the same two founder lines (B73, Mo17). Two populations were genotyped with different marker sets at different density: IBM Syn4 and IBM Syn10. A high-density marker set in Syn10 was imputed into the Syn4 population with low marker density. Seven different prediction scenarios were carried out with a random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model. The result showed that the closer the real genetic relationship between training and validation population, the fewer markers were required to reach a good prediction accuracy. Taken the short-term cost for consideration, relationship information is more valuable than LD information. Meanwhile, the result indicated that accuracies based on high LD between QTL and markers were more stable over generations, thus LD information would provide more robust prediction capacity in practical applications. Public Library of Science 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4493124/ /pubmed/26148055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379 Text en © 2015 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Hongjun
Zhou, Huangkai
Wu, Yongsheng
Li, Xiao
Zhao, Jing
Zuo, Tao
Zhang, Xuan
Zhang, Yongzhong
Liu, Sisi
Shen, Yaou
Lin, Haijian
Zhang, Zhiming
Huang, Kaijian
Lübberstedt, Thomas
Pan, Guangtang
The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title_full The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title_fullStr The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title_short The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
title_sort impact of genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium on genomic selection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhongjun theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhouhuangkai theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT wuyongsheng theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT lixiao theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhaojing theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zuotao theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangxuan theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangyongzhong theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT liusisi theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT shenyaou theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT linhaijian theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangzhiming theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT huangkaijian theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT lubberstedtthomas theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT panguangtang theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT liuhongjun impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhouhuangkai impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT wuyongsheng impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT lixiao impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhaojing impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zuotao impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangxuan impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangyongzhong impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT liusisi impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT shenyaou impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT linhaijian impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT zhangzhiming impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT huangkaijian impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT lubberstedtthomas impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection
AT panguangtang impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection