Cargando…
The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection
Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379 |
_version_ | 1782379869949132800 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Hongjun Zhou, Huangkai Wu, Yongsheng Li, Xiao Zhao, Jing Zuo, Tao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yongzhong Liu, Sisi Shen, Yaou Lin, Haijian Zhang, Zhiming Huang, Kaijian Lübberstedt, Thomas Pan, Guangtang |
author_facet | Liu, Hongjun Zhou, Huangkai Wu, Yongsheng Li, Xiao Zhao, Jing Zuo, Tao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yongzhong Liu, Sisi Shen, Yaou Lin, Haijian Zhang, Zhiming Huang, Kaijian Lübberstedt, Thomas Pan, Guangtang |
author_sort | Liu, Hongjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was further discussed. This study is based on experimental data of two populations derived from the same two founder lines (B73, Mo17). Two populations were genotyped with different marker sets at different density: IBM Syn4 and IBM Syn10. A high-density marker set in Syn10 was imputed into the Syn4 population with low marker density. Seven different prediction scenarios were carried out with a random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model. The result showed that the closer the real genetic relationship between training and validation population, the fewer markers were required to reach a good prediction accuracy. Taken the short-term cost for consideration, relationship information is more valuable than LD information. Meanwhile, the result indicated that accuracies based on high LD between QTL and markers were more stable over generations, thus LD information would provide more robust prediction capacity in practical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4493124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44931242015-07-15 The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection Liu, Hongjun Zhou, Huangkai Wu, Yongsheng Li, Xiao Zhao, Jing Zuo, Tao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yongzhong Liu, Sisi Shen, Yaou Lin, Haijian Zhang, Zhiming Huang, Kaijian Lübberstedt, Thomas Pan, Guangtang PLoS One Research Article Genomic selection is a promising research area due to its practical application in breeding. In this study, impact of realized genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium (LD) on marker density and training population size required was investigated and their impact on practical application was further discussed. This study is based on experimental data of two populations derived from the same two founder lines (B73, Mo17). Two populations were genotyped with different marker sets at different density: IBM Syn4 and IBM Syn10. A high-density marker set in Syn10 was imputed into the Syn4 population with low marker density. Seven different prediction scenarios were carried out with a random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) model. The result showed that the closer the real genetic relationship between training and validation population, the fewer markers were required to reach a good prediction accuracy. Taken the short-term cost for consideration, relationship information is more valuable than LD information. Meanwhile, the result indicated that accuracies based on high LD between QTL and markers were more stable over generations, thus LD information would provide more robust prediction capacity in practical applications. Public Library of Science 2015-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4493124/ /pubmed/26148055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379 Text en © 2015 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Hongjun Zhou, Huangkai Wu, Yongsheng Li, Xiao Zhao, Jing Zuo, Tao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Yongzhong Liu, Sisi Shen, Yaou Lin, Haijian Zhang, Zhiming Huang, Kaijian Lübberstedt, Thomas Pan, Guangtang The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title | The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title_full | The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title_short | The Impact of Genetic Relationship and Linkage Disequilibrium on Genomic Selection |
title_sort | impact of genetic relationship and linkage disequilibrium on genomic selection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26148055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhongjun theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhouhuangkai theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT wuyongsheng theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT lixiao theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhaojing theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zuotao theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangxuan theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangyongzhong theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT liusisi theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT shenyaou theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT linhaijian theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangzhiming theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT huangkaijian theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT lubberstedtthomas theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT panguangtang theimpactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT liuhongjun impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhouhuangkai impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT wuyongsheng impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT lixiao impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhaojing impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zuotao impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangxuan impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangyongzhong impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT liusisi impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT shenyaou impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT linhaijian impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT zhangzhiming impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT huangkaijian impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT lubberstedtthomas impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection AT panguangtang impactofgeneticrelationshipandlinkagedisequilibriumongenomicselection |