Cargando…

Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness of prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation (PINI), we analyzed patterns of failure in anal cancer patients who were inguinal node-negative at presentation and did not receive PINI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 33 anal canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hakyoung, Park, Hee Chul, Yu, Jeong Il, Choi, Doo Ho, Ahn, Yong Chan, Kim, Seung Tae, Park, Joon Oh, Park, Young Suk, Kim, Hee Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2015.33.2.83
_version_ 1782379914720182272
author Kim, Hakyoung
Park, Hee Chul
Yu, Jeong Il
Choi, Doo Ho
Ahn, Yong Chan
Kim, Seung Tae
Park, Joon Oh
Park, Young Suk
Kim, Hee Cheol
author_facet Kim, Hakyoung
Park, Hee Chul
Yu, Jeong Il
Choi, Doo Ho
Ahn, Yong Chan
Kim, Seung Tae
Park, Joon Oh
Park, Young Suk
Kim, Hee Cheol
author_sort Kim, Hakyoung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness of prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation (PINI), we analyzed patterns of failure in anal cancer patients who were inguinal node-negative at presentation and did not receive PINI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 33 anal cancer patients treated by definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) between 1994 and 2013. Radiotherapy consisted of a total dose of 44-45 Gy (22-25 fractions in 5 weeks) on the whole pelvis, anus, and perineum. Except inguinal lymphadenopathy was present at initial diagnosis, the entire inguinal chain was not included in the radiation field. In other words, there was no PINI. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 50 months (range, 4 to 218 months). Median survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 57 months (range, 10 to 218 months) and 50 months (range, 4 to 218 months), respectively. Among the survival, the median follow-up duration was 51 months (range, 12 to 218 months). The 5-year overall survival and PFS rates were 93.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Although none of the patients received inguinal node irradiation for prophylactic purposes, there was no inguinal recurrence. CONCLUSION: Treatment of anal cancer by omitting PINI might be considered in selected patients with clinically uninvolved inguinal nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44934322015-07-08 Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients? Kim, Hakyoung Park, Hee Chul Yu, Jeong Il Choi, Doo Ho Ahn, Yong Chan Kim, Seung Tae Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Kim, Hee Cheol Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriateness of prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation (PINI), we analyzed patterns of failure in anal cancer patients who were inguinal node-negative at presentation and did not receive PINI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 33 anal cancer patients treated by definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) between 1994 and 2013. Radiotherapy consisted of a total dose of 44-45 Gy (22-25 fractions in 5 weeks) on the whole pelvis, anus, and perineum. Except inguinal lymphadenopathy was present at initial diagnosis, the entire inguinal chain was not included in the radiation field. In other words, there was no PINI. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 50 months (range, 4 to 218 months). Median survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 57 months (range, 10 to 218 months) and 50 months (range, 4 to 218 months), respectively. Among the survival, the median follow-up duration was 51 months (range, 12 to 218 months). The 5-year overall survival and PFS rates were 93.4% and 88.8%, respectively. Although none of the patients received inguinal node irradiation for prophylactic purposes, there was no inguinal recurrence. CONCLUSION: Treatment of anal cancer by omitting PINI might be considered in selected patients with clinically uninvolved inguinal nodes. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2015-06 2015-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4493432/ /pubmed/26157677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2015.33.2.83 Text en Copyright © 2015. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hakyoung
Park, Hee Chul
Yu, Jeong Il
Choi, Doo Ho
Ahn, Yong Chan
Kim, Seung Tae
Park, Joon Oh
Park, Young Suk
Kim, Hee Cheol
Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title_full Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title_fullStr Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title_full_unstemmed Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title_short Can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
title_sort can we omit prophylactic inguinal nodal irradiation in anal cancer patients?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2015.33.2.83
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhakyoung canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT parkheechul canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT yujeongil canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT choidooho canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT ahnyongchan canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT kimseungtae canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT parkjoonoh canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT parkyoungsuk canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients
AT kimheecheol canweomitprophylacticinguinalnodalirradiationinanalcancerpatients