Cargando…

Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience

In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and geno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katsanis, Sara Huston, Minear, Mollie A., Vorderstrasse, Allison, Yang, Nancy, Reeves, Jason W., Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder, Cook-Deegan, Robert, Ginsburg, Geoffrey S., Simmons, Leigh Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067
_version_ 1782379925231108096
author Katsanis, Sara Huston
Minear, Mollie A.
Vorderstrasse, Allison
Yang, Nancy
Reeves, Jason W.
Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder
Cook-Deegan, Robert
Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
Simmons, Leigh Ann
author_facet Katsanis, Sara Huston
Minear, Mollie A.
Vorderstrasse, Allison
Yang, Nancy
Reeves, Jason W.
Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder
Cook-Deegan, Robert
Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
Simmons, Leigh Ann
author_sort Katsanis, Sara Huston
collection PubMed
description In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and genomic testing adoption. We assessed providers’ use of genetic and genomic testing options and indications in clinical practice, providers’ awareness of pharmacogenetic applications, and providers’ opinions on returning research-generated genetic test results to participants. Most clinician respondents currently use family history routinely in their clinical practice, but only 18 percent of clinicians use pharmacogenetics. Only two respondents correctly identified the number of drug package inserts with pharmacogenetic indications. We also found strong support for the return of genetic research results to participants. Our results demonstrate that while Duke healthcare providers are enthusiastic about genomic technologies, use of genomic tools outside of research has been limited. Respondents favor return of research-based genetic results to participants, but clinicians lack knowledge about pharmacogenetic applications. We identified challenges faced by this institution when implementing genetic and genomic testing into patient care that should inform a policy and education agenda to improve provider support and clinician-researcher partnerships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44934862015-07-07 Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience Katsanis, Sara Huston Minear, Mollie A. Vorderstrasse, Allison Yang, Nancy Reeves, Jason W. Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder Cook-Deegan, Robert Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. Simmons, Leigh Ann J Pers Med Article In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and genomic testing adoption. We assessed providers’ use of genetic and genomic testing options and indications in clinical practice, providers’ awareness of pharmacogenetic applications, and providers’ opinions on returning research-generated genetic test results to participants. Most clinician respondents currently use family history routinely in their clinical practice, but only 18 percent of clinicians use pharmacogenetics. Only two respondents correctly identified the number of drug package inserts with pharmacogenetic indications. We also found strong support for the return of genetic research results to participants. Our results demonstrate that while Duke healthcare providers are enthusiastic about genomic technologies, use of genomic tools outside of research has been limited. Respondents favor return of research-based genetic results to participants, but clinicians lack knowledge about pharmacogenetic applications. We identified challenges faced by this institution when implementing genetic and genomic testing into patient care that should inform a policy and education agenda to improve provider support and clinician-researcher partnerships. MDPI 2015-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4493486/ /pubmed/25854543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Katsanis, Sara Huston
Minear, Mollie A.
Vorderstrasse, Allison
Yang, Nancy
Reeves, Jason W.
Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder
Cook-Deegan, Robert
Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.
Simmons, Leigh Ann
Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title_full Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title_fullStr Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title_short Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
title_sort perspectives on genetic and genomic technologies in an academic medical center: the duke experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067
work_keys_str_mv AT katsanissarahuston perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT minearmolliea perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT vorderstrasseallison perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT yangnancy perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT reevesjasonw perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT rakhraburristejinder perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT cookdeeganrobert perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT ginsburggeoffreys perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience
AT simmonsleighann perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience