Cargando…
Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience
In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and geno...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067 |
_version_ | 1782379925231108096 |
---|---|
author | Katsanis, Sara Huston Minear, Mollie A. Vorderstrasse, Allison Yang, Nancy Reeves, Jason W. Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder Cook-Deegan, Robert Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. Simmons, Leigh Ann |
author_facet | Katsanis, Sara Huston Minear, Mollie A. Vorderstrasse, Allison Yang, Nancy Reeves, Jason W. Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder Cook-Deegan, Robert Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. Simmons, Leigh Ann |
author_sort | Katsanis, Sara Huston |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and genomic testing adoption. We assessed providers’ use of genetic and genomic testing options and indications in clinical practice, providers’ awareness of pharmacogenetic applications, and providers’ opinions on returning research-generated genetic test results to participants. Most clinician respondents currently use family history routinely in their clinical practice, but only 18 percent of clinicians use pharmacogenetics. Only two respondents correctly identified the number of drug package inserts with pharmacogenetic indications. We also found strong support for the return of genetic research results to participants. Our results demonstrate that while Duke healthcare providers are enthusiastic about genomic technologies, use of genomic tools outside of research has been limited. Respondents favor return of research-based genetic results to participants, but clinicians lack knowledge about pharmacogenetic applications. We identified challenges faced by this institution when implementing genetic and genomic testing into patient care that should inform a policy and education agenda to improve provider support and clinician-researcher partnerships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4493486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44934862015-07-07 Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience Katsanis, Sara Huston Minear, Mollie A. Vorderstrasse, Allison Yang, Nancy Reeves, Jason W. Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder Cook-Deegan, Robert Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. Simmons, Leigh Ann J Pers Med Article In this age of personalized medicine, genetic and genomic testing is expected to become instrumental in health care delivery, but little is known about its actual implementation in clinical practice. Methods. We surveyed Duke faculty and healthcare providers to examine the extent of genetic and genomic testing adoption. We assessed providers’ use of genetic and genomic testing options and indications in clinical practice, providers’ awareness of pharmacogenetic applications, and providers’ opinions on returning research-generated genetic test results to participants. Most clinician respondents currently use family history routinely in their clinical practice, but only 18 percent of clinicians use pharmacogenetics. Only two respondents correctly identified the number of drug package inserts with pharmacogenetic indications. We also found strong support for the return of genetic research results to participants. Our results demonstrate that while Duke healthcare providers are enthusiastic about genomic technologies, use of genomic tools outside of research has been limited. Respondents favor return of research-based genetic results to participants, but clinicians lack knowledge about pharmacogenetic applications. We identified challenges faced by this institution when implementing genetic and genomic testing into patient care that should inform a policy and education agenda to improve provider support and clinician-researcher partnerships. MDPI 2015-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4493486/ /pubmed/25854543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Katsanis, Sara Huston Minear, Mollie A. Vorderstrasse, Allison Yang, Nancy Reeves, Jason W. Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder Cook-Deegan, Robert Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. Simmons, Leigh Ann Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title | Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title_full | Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title_fullStr | Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title_short | Perspectives on Genetic and Genomic Technologies in an Academic Medical Center: The Duke Experience |
title_sort | perspectives on genetic and genomic technologies in an academic medical center: the duke experience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katsanissarahuston perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT minearmolliea perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT vorderstrasseallison perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT yangnancy perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT reevesjasonw perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT rakhraburristejinder perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT cookdeeganrobert perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT ginsburggeoffreys perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience AT simmonsleighann perspectivesongeneticandgenomictechnologiesinanacademicmedicalcenterthedukeexperience |