Cargando…

Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietlein, Markus, Kobe, Carsten, Kuhnert, Georg, Stockter, Simone, Fischer, Thomas, Schomäcker, Klaus, Schmidt, Matthias, Dietlein, Felix, Zlatopolskiy, Boris D., Krapf, Philipp, Richarz, Raphael, Neubauer, Stephan, Drzezga, Alexander, Neumaier, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0
_version_ 1782379978494574592
author Dietlein, Markus
Kobe, Carsten
Kuhnert, Georg
Stockter, Simone
Fischer, Thomas
Schomäcker, Klaus
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Felix
Zlatopolskiy, Boris D.
Krapf, Philipp
Richarz, Raphael
Neubauer, Stephan
Drzezga, Alexander
Neumaier, Bernd
author_facet Dietlein, Markus
Kobe, Carsten
Kuhnert, Georg
Stockter, Simone
Fischer, Thomas
Schomäcker, Klaus
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Felix
Zlatopolskiy, Boris D.
Krapf, Philipp
Richarz, Raphael
Neubauer, Stephan
Drzezga, Alexander
Neumaier, Bernd
author_sort Dietlein, Markus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [(18)F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)(max) and the lesion to background ratios. RESULTS: All suspicious lesions identified by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [(18)F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUV(max) in the concordant [(18)F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [(18)F]DCFPyL compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [(18)F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44937762015-07-08 Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer Dietlein, Markus Kobe, Carsten Kuhnert, Georg Stockter, Simone Fischer, Thomas Schomäcker, Klaus Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Felix Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. Krapf, Philipp Richarz, Raphael Neubauer, Stephan Drzezga, Alexander Neumaier, Bernd Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [(18)F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)(max) and the lesion to background ratios. RESULTS: All suspicious lesions identified by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [(18)F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUV(max) in the concordant [(18)F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [(18)F]DCFPyL compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [(18)F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer. Springer US 2015-05-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4493776/ /pubmed/26013479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dietlein, Markus
Kobe, Carsten
Kuhnert, Georg
Stockter, Simone
Fischer, Thomas
Schomäcker, Klaus
Schmidt, Matthias
Dietlein, Felix
Zlatopolskiy, Boris D.
Krapf, Philipp
Richarz, Raphael
Neubauer, Stephan
Drzezga, Alexander
Neumaier, Bernd
Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title_full Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title_short Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
title_sort comparison of [(18)f]dcfpyl and [(68)ga]ga-psma-hbed-cc for psma-pet imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dietleinmarkus comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT kobecarsten comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT kuhnertgeorg comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT stocktersimone comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT fischerthomas comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT schomackerklaus comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT schmidtmatthias comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT dietleinfelix comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT zlatopolskiyborisd comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT krapfphilipp comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT richarzraphael comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT neubauerstephan comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT drzezgaalexander comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer
AT neumaierbernd comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer