Cargando…
Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0 |
_version_ | 1782379978494574592 |
---|---|
author | Dietlein, Markus Kobe, Carsten Kuhnert, Georg Stockter, Simone Fischer, Thomas Schomäcker, Klaus Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Felix Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. Krapf, Philipp Richarz, Raphael Neubauer, Stephan Drzezga, Alexander Neumaier, Bernd |
author_facet | Dietlein, Markus Kobe, Carsten Kuhnert, Georg Stockter, Simone Fischer, Thomas Schomäcker, Klaus Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Felix Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. Krapf, Philipp Richarz, Raphael Neubauer, Stephan Drzezga, Alexander Neumaier, Bernd |
author_sort | Dietlein, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [(18)F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)(max) and the lesion to background ratios. RESULTS: All suspicious lesions identified by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [(18)F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUV(max) in the concordant [(18)F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [(18)F]DCFPyL compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [(18)F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4493776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44937762015-07-08 Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer Dietlein, Markus Kobe, Carsten Kuhnert, Georg Stockter, Simone Fischer, Thomas Schomäcker, Klaus Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Felix Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. Krapf, Philipp Richarz, Raphael Neubauer, Stephan Drzezga, Alexander Neumaier, Bernd Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: Gallium-68 (Ga-68)-labeled tracers for imaging expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) such as the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC have already demonstrated high potential for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. However, compared to Ga-68, a labeling with fluorine-18 (F-18) would offer advantages with respect to availability, production amount, and image resolution. [(18)F]DCFPyL is a promising F-18-labeled candidate for PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging that has been recently introduced. In the current study, we aimed to compare [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC and [(18)F]DCFPyL for clinical use in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: In 14 selected patients with PSA relapse of prostate cancer, [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed in addition to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. A systematic comparison was carried out between results obtained with both tracers with regard to the number of detected PSMA-positive lesions, the standardized uptake value (SUV)(max) and the lesion to background ratios. RESULTS: All suspicious lesions identified by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC were also detected with [(18)F]DCFPyL. In three patients, additional lesions were observed using [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT. The mean SUV(max) in the concordant [(18)F]DCFPyL PSMA-positive lesions was significantly higher as compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (14.5 vs. 12.2, p = 0.028, n = 15). The mean tumor to background ratios (n = 15) were significantly higher for [(18)F]DCFPyL compared to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC using kidney, spleen, or parotid as reference organs (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, p = 0.008), but no significant differences were found using the liver (p = 0.167) or the mediastinum (p = 0.363) as reference organs. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT provided a high image quality and visualized small prostate lesions with excellent sensitivity. [(18)F]DCFPyL represents a highly promising alternative to [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET/CT imaging in relapsed prostate cancer. Springer US 2015-05-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4493776/ /pubmed/26013479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dietlein, Markus Kobe, Carsten Kuhnert, Georg Stockter, Simone Fischer, Thomas Schomäcker, Klaus Schmidt, Matthias Dietlein, Felix Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. Krapf, Philipp Richarz, Raphael Neubauer, Stephan Drzezga, Alexander Neumaier, Bernd Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title | Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of [(18)f]dcfpyl and [(68)ga]ga-psma-hbed-cc for psma-pet imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietleinmarkus comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT kobecarsten comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT kuhnertgeorg comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT stocktersimone comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT fischerthomas comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT schomackerklaus comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT schmidtmatthias comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT dietleinfelix comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT zlatopolskiyborisd comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT krapfphilipp comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT richarzraphael comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT neubauerstephan comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT drzezgaalexander comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer AT neumaierbernd comparisonof18fdcfpyland68gagapsmahbedccforpsmapetimaginginpatientswithrelapsedprostatecancer |