Cargando…

Lung Volume Reduction in Emphysema Improves Chest Wall Asynchrony

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) techniques improve lung function in selected patients with emphysema, but the impact of LVR procedures on the asynchronous movement of different chest wall compartments, which is a feature of emphysema, is not known. METHODS: We used optoelectronic plethysmogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoumot, Zaid, LoMauro, Antonella, Aliverti, Andrea, Nelson, Christopher, Ward, Simon, Jordan, Simon, Polkey, Michael I., Shah, Pallav L., Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American College of Chest Physicians 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-2380
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) techniques improve lung function in selected patients with emphysema, but the impact of LVR procedures on the asynchronous movement of different chest wall compartments, which is a feature of emphysema, is not known. METHODS: We used optoelectronic plethysmography to assess the effect of surgical and bronchoscopic LVR on chest wall asynchrony. Twenty-six patients were assessed before and 3 months after LVR (surgical [n = 9] or bronchoscopic [n = 7]) or a sham/unsuccessful bronchoscopic treatment (control subjects, n = 10). Chest wall volumes were divided into six compartments (left and right of each of pulmonary ribcage [Vrc,p], abdominal ribcage [Vrc,a], and abdomen [Vab]) and phase shift angles (θ) calculated for the asynchrony between Vrc,p and Vrc,a (θRC), and between Vrc,a and Vab (θDIA). RESULTS: Participants had an FEV(1) of 34.6 ± 18% predicted and a residual volume of 217.8 ± 46.0% predicted with significant chest wall asynchrony during quiet breathing at baseline (θRC, 31.3° ± 38.4°; and θDIA, −38.7° ± 36.3°). Between-group difference in the change in θRC and θDIA during quiet breathing following treatment was 44.3° (95% CI, −78 to −10.6; P = .003) and 34.5° (95% CI, 1.4 to 67.5; P = .007) toward 0° (representing perfect synchrony), respectively, favoring the LVR group. Changes in θRC and θDIA were statistically significant on the treated but not the untreated sides. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LVR significantly reduces chest wall asynchrony in patients with emphysema.