Cargando…
Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Whil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2 |
_version_ | 1782380003381477376 |
---|---|
author | Ackland, David C Patel, Minoo Knox, David |
author_facet | Ackland, David C Patel, Minoo Knox, David |
author_sort | Ackland, David C |
collection | PubMed |
description | The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4493953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44939532015-07-08 Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Ackland, David C Patel, Minoo Knox, David J Orthop Surg Res Review The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome. BioMed Central 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4493953/ /pubmed/26135298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2 Text en © Ackland et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Ackland, David C Patel, Minoo Knox, David Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_short | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_sort | prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acklanddavidc prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT patelminoo prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT knoxdavid prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty |