Cargando…

Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Whil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackland, David C, Patel, Minoo, Knox, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2
_version_ 1782380003381477376
author Ackland, David C
Patel, Minoo
Knox, David
author_facet Ackland, David C
Patel, Minoo
Knox, David
author_sort Ackland, David C
collection PubMed
description The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44939532015-07-08 Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Ackland, David C Patel, Minoo Knox, David J Orthop Surg Res Review The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome. BioMed Central 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4493953/ /pubmed/26135298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2 Text en © Ackland et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ackland, David C
Patel, Minoo
Knox, David
Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_short Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2
work_keys_str_mv AT acklanddavidc prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT patelminoo prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT knoxdavid prosthesisdesignandplacementinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty