Cargando…

Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight has been criticized as being biased because of an observed tendency for overweight and obese people to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in higher misclassification for these groups. We examined the vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skeie, Guri, Mode, Nicolle, Henningsen, Maria, Borch, Kristin Benjaminsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170718
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S83839
_version_ 1782380007437369344
author Skeie, Guri
Mode, Nicolle
Henningsen, Maria
Borch, Kristin Benjaminsen
author_facet Skeie, Guri
Mode, Nicolle
Henningsen, Maria
Borch, Kristin Benjaminsen
author_sort Skeie, Guri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight has been criticized as being biased because of an observed tendency for overweight and obese people to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in higher misclassification for these groups. We examined the validity of BMI based on self-reported values in a sample of Norwegian women aged 44–64 years. METHODS: The study sample of 1,837 participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study self-reported height and weight, and then, within 1 year, either self-reported anthropometric again, or were measured by medical staff. Demographic and anthropometric were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests of independence. Misclassification of BMI categories was assessed by weighted Cohen’s kappa and Bland–Altman plot. RESULTS: On average, the two measurements were taken 8 months apart, and self-reported weight increased by 0.6 kg (P<0.05), and BMI by 0.2 kg/m(2) (P<0.05). The distribution of BMI categories did not differ between self-reported and measured values. There was substantial agreement between self-reported values and those measured by medical staff (weighted kappa 0.73). Under-reporting resulting in misclassification of BMI category was most common among overweight women (36%), but the highest proportion of extreme under-reporting was found in obese women (18% outside the 95% limits of agreement). The cumulative distribution curves for the measured and self-reported values closely followed each other, but measurements by medical staff were shifted slightly toward higher BMI values. CONCLUSION: While there was substantial agreement between self-reported and measured BMI values, there was small but statistically significant under-reporting of weight and thus self-reported BMI. The tendency to under-report was largest among overweight women, while the largest degree of under-reporting was found in the obese group. Self-reported weight and height provide a valid ranking of BMI for middle-aged Norwegian women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4493970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44939702015-07-13 Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study Skeie, Guri Mode, Nicolle Henningsen, Maria Borch, Kristin Benjaminsen Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight has been criticized as being biased because of an observed tendency for overweight and obese people to overestimate height and underestimate weight, resulting in higher misclassification for these groups. We examined the validity of BMI based on self-reported values in a sample of Norwegian women aged 44–64 years. METHODS: The study sample of 1,837 participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study self-reported height and weight, and then, within 1 year, either self-reported anthropometric again, or were measured by medical staff. Demographic and anthropometric were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests of independence. Misclassification of BMI categories was assessed by weighted Cohen’s kappa and Bland–Altman plot. RESULTS: On average, the two measurements were taken 8 months apart, and self-reported weight increased by 0.6 kg (P<0.05), and BMI by 0.2 kg/m(2) (P<0.05). The distribution of BMI categories did not differ between self-reported and measured values. There was substantial agreement between self-reported values and those measured by medical staff (weighted kappa 0.73). Under-reporting resulting in misclassification of BMI category was most common among overweight women (36%), but the highest proportion of extreme under-reporting was found in obese women (18% outside the 95% limits of agreement). The cumulative distribution curves for the measured and self-reported values closely followed each other, but measurements by medical staff were shifted slightly toward higher BMI values. CONCLUSION: While there was substantial agreement between self-reported and measured BMI values, there was small but statistically significant under-reporting of weight and thus self-reported BMI. The tendency to under-report was largest among overweight women, while the largest degree of under-reporting was found in the obese group. Self-reported weight and height provide a valid ranking of BMI for middle-aged Norwegian women. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4493970/ /pubmed/26170718 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S83839 Text en © 2015 Skeie et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Skeie, Guri
Mode, Nicolle
Henningsen, Maria
Borch, Kristin Benjaminsen
Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title_full Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title_fullStr Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title_full_unstemmed Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title_short Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study
title_sort validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the norwegian women and cancer study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170718
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S83839
work_keys_str_mv AT skeieguri validityofselfreportedbodymassindexamongmiddleagedparticipantsinthenorwegianwomenandcancerstudy
AT modenicolle validityofselfreportedbodymassindexamongmiddleagedparticipantsinthenorwegianwomenandcancerstudy
AT henningsenmaria validityofselfreportedbodymassindexamongmiddleagedparticipantsinthenorwegianwomenandcancerstudy
AT borchkristinbenjaminsen validityofselfreportedbodymassindexamongmiddleagedparticipantsinthenorwegianwomenandcancerstudy