Cargando…

Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs

In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrini, Stefano, Ramadori, Giorgio, Villa, Riccardo, Borghetti, Paolo, de Angelis, Elena, Cantoni, Anna Maria, Corradi, Attilio, Amici, Augusto, Ferrari, Maura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463
_version_ 1782380043977097216
author Petrini, Stefano
Ramadori, Giorgio
Villa, Riccardo
Borghetti, Paolo
de Angelis, Elena
Cantoni, Anna Maria
Corradi, Attilio
Amici, Augusto
Ferrari, Maura
author_facet Petrini, Stefano
Ramadori, Giorgio
Villa, Riccardo
Borghetti, Paolo
de Angelis, Elena
Cantoni, Anna Maria
Corradi, Attilio
Amici, Augusto
Ferrari, Maura
author_sort Petrini, Stefano
collection PubMed
description In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for their innocuity and efficacy in pigs. Eighteen animals were divided into five groups which were injected with five (A, B, C, D, E) different DNA vaccines. Albeit, none of the proposed vaccines were able to protect the animals against PRRS virus. Only vaccines A and B were able to reduce the clinical signs of the infection. ELISA IgM were detected 30 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine A or B. ELISA IgG were detected 90 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine B or C. Neutralizing antibody were detected Post Challenge Days 61 (PCD) in all groups. In the pigs inoculated with Vaccine C, IFN-γ were detected 90 days after first vaccination, and after challenge exposure they increased. In the other groups, the IFN-γ were detected after challenge infection. Pigs injected with each of the vaccines A, B, C, D and E showed a significantly higher level of CD4(−)CD8(+) lymphocytes (p < 0.001) after infection in comparison with their controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44942072015-08-31 Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs Petrini, Stefano Ramadori, Giorgio Villa, Riccardo Borghetti, Paolo de Angelis, Elena Cantoni, Anna Maria Corradi, Attilio Amici, Augusto Ferrari, Maura Vaccines (Basel) Article In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for their innocuity and efficacy in pigs. Eighteen animals were divided into five groups which were injected with five (A, B, C, D, E) different DNA vaccines. Albeit, none of the proposed vaccines were able to protect the animals against PRRS virus. Only vaccines A and B were able to reduce the clinical signs of the infection. ELISA IgM were detected 30 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine A or B. ELISA IgG were detected 90 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine B or C. Neutralizing antibody were detected Post Challenge Days 61 (PCD) in all groups. In the pigs inoculated with Vaccine C, IFN-γ were detected 90 days after first vaccination, and after challenge exposure they increased. In the other groups, the IFN-γ were detected after challenge infection. Pigs injected with each of the vaccines A, B, C, D and E showed a significantly higher level of CD4(−)CD8(+) lymphocytes (p < 0.001) after infection in comparison with their controls. MDPI 2013-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4494207/ /pubmed/26344342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Petrini, Stefano
Ramadori, Giorgio
Villa, Riccardo
Borghetti, Paolo
de Angelis, Elena
Cantoni, Anna Maria
Corradi, Attilio
Amici, Augusto
Ferrari, Maura
Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title_full Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title_short Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
title_sort evaluation of different dna vaccines against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (prrs) in pigs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463
work_keys_str_mv AT petrinistefano evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT ramadorigiorgio evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT villariccardo evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT borghettipaolo evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT deangeliselena evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT cantoniannamaria evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT corradiattilio evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT amiciaugusto evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs
AT ferrarimaura evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs