Cargando…
Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs
In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463 |
_version_ | 1782380043977097216 |
---|---|
author | Petrini, Stefano Ramadori, Giorgio Villa, Riccardo Borghetti, Paolo de Angelis, Elena Cantoni, Anna Maria Corradi, Attilio Amici, Augusto Ferrari, Maura |
author_facet | Petrini, Stefano Ramadori, Giorgio Villa, Riccardo Borghetti, Paolo de Angelis, Elena Cantoni, Anna Maria Corradi, Attilio Amici, Augusto Ferrari, Maura |
author_sort | Petrini, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for their innocuity and efficacy in pigs. Eighteen animals were divided into five groups which were injected with five (A, B, C, D, E) different DNA vaccines. Albeit, none of the proposed vaccines were able to protect the animals against PRRS virus. Only vaccines A and B were able to reduce the clinical signs of the infection. ELISA IgM were detected 30 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine A or B. ELISA IgG were detected 90 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine B or C. Neutralizing antibody were detected Post Challenge Days 61 (PCD) in all groups. In the pigs inoculated with Vaccine C, IFN-γ were detected 90 days after first vaccination, and after challenge exposure they increased. In the other groups, the IFN-γ were detected after challenge infection. Pigs injected with each of the vaccines A, B, C, D and E showed a significantly higher level of CD4(−)CD8(+) lymphocytes (p < 0.001) after infection in comparison with their controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4494207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44942072015-08-31 Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs Petrini, Stefano Ramadori, Giorgio Villa, Riccardo Borghetti, Paolo de Angelis, Elena Cantoni, Anna Maria Corradi, Attilio Amici, Augusto Ferrari, Maura Vaccines (Basel) Article In veterinary medicine, there have been different experiences with the plasmid DNA vaccination. In this area and with the hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of different plasmids encoding porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome (PRRS), five DNA vaccines against PRRS were evaluated for their innocuity and efficacy in pigs. Eighteen animals were divided into five groups which were injected with five (A, B, C, D, E) different DNA vaccines. Albeit, none of the proposed vaccines were able to protect the animals against PRRS virus. Only vaccines A and B were able to reduce the clinical signs of the infection. ELISA IgM were detected 30 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine A or B. ELISA IgG were detected 90 days after the first vaccination in the pigs injected by Vaccine B or C. Neutralizing antibody were detected Post Challenge Days 61 (PCD) in all groups. In the pigs inoculated with Vaccine C, IFN-γ were detected 90 days after first vaccination, and after challenge exposure they increased. In the other groups, the IFN-γ were detected after challenge infection. Pigs injected with each of the vaccines A, B, C, D and E showed a significantly higher level of CD4(−)CD8(+) lymphocytes (p < 0.001) after infection in comparison with their controls. MDPI 2013-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4494207/ /pubmed/26344342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Petrini, Stefano Ramadori, Giorgio Villa, Riccardo Borghetti, Paolo de Angelis, Elena Cantoni, Anna Maria Corradi, Attilio Amici, Augusto Ferrari, Maura Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title | Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title_full | Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title_short | Evaluation of Different DNA Vaccines against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) in Pigs |
title_sort | evaluation of different dna vaccines against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (prrs) in pigs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines1040463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrinistefano evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT ramadorigiorgio evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT villariccardo evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT borghettipaolo evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT deangeliselena evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT cantoniannamaria evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT corradiattilio evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT amiciaugusto evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs AT ferrarimaura evaluationofdifferentdnavaccinesagainstporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromeprrsinpigs |