Cargando…
Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges
Conventional vaccine strategies have been highly efficacious for several decades in reducing mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. The bane of conventional vaccines, such as those that include whole organisms or large proteins, appear to be the inclusion of unnecessary antigenic load t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2030515 |
_version_ | 1782380045990363136 |
---|---|
author | Li, Weidang Joshi, Medha D. Singhania, Smita Ramsey, Kyle H. Murthy, Ashlesh K. |
author_facet | Li, Weidang Joshi, Medha D. Singhania, Smita Ramsey, Kyle H. Murthy, Ashlesh K. |
author_sort | Li, Weidang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conventional vaccine strategies have been highly efficacious for several decades in reducing mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. The bane of conventional vaccines, such as those that include whole organisms or large proteins, appear to be the inclusion of unnecessary antigenic load that, not only contributes little to the protective immune response, but complicates the situation by inducing allergenic and/or reactogenic responses. Peptide vaccines are an attractive alternative strategy that relies on usage of short peptide fragments to engineer the induction of highly targeted immune responses, consequently avoiding allergenic and/or reactogenic sequences. Conversely, peptide vaccines used in isolation are often weakly immunogenic and require particulate carriers for delivery and adjuvanting. In this article, we discuss the specific advantages and considerations in targeted induction of immune responses by peptide vaccines and progresses in the development of such vaccines against various diseases. Additionally, we also discuss the development of particulate carrier strategies and the inherent challenges with regard to safety when combining such technologies with peptide vaccines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4494216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44942162015-08-31 Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges Li, Weidang Joshi, Medha D. Singhania, Smita Ramsey, Kyle H. Murthy, Ashlesh K. Vaccines (Basel) Review Conventional vaccine strategies have been highly efficacious for several decades in reducing mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. The bane of conventional vaccines, such as those that include whole organisms or large proteins, appear to be the inclusion of unnecessary antigenic load that, not only contributes little to the protective immune response, but complicates the situation by inducing allergenic and/or reactogenic responses. Peptide vaccines are an attractive alternative strategy that relies on usage of short peptide fragments to engineer the induction of highly targeted immune responses, consequently avoiding allergenic and/or reactogenic sequences. Conversely, peptide vaccines used in isolation are often weakly immunogenic and require particulate carriers for delivery and adjuvanting. In this article, we discuss the specific advantages and considerations in targeted induction of immune responses by peptide vaccines and progresses in the development of such vaccines against various diseases. Additionally, we also discuss the development of particulate carrier strategies and the inherent challenges with regard to safety when combining such technologies with peptide vaccines. MDPI 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4494216/ /pubmed/26344743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2030515 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Li, Weidang Joshi, Medha D. Singhania, Smita Ramsey, Kyle H. Murthy, Ashlesh K. Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title | Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title_full | Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title_fullStr | Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title_short | Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges |
title_sort | peptide vaccine: progress and challenges |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2030515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liweidang peptidevaccineprogressandchallenges AT joshimedhad peptidevaccineprogressandchallenges AT singhaniasmita peptidevaccineprogressandchallenges AT ramseykyleh peptidevaccineprogressandchallenges AT murthyashleshk peptidevaccineprogressandchallenges |