Cargando…
Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future
Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2040707 |
_version_ | 1782380053510750208 |
---|---|
author | Trombetta, Claudia Maria Perini, Daniele Mather, Stuart Temperton, Nigel Montomoli, Emanuele |
author_facet | Trombetta, Claudia Maria Perini, Daniele Mather, Stuart Temperton, Nigel Montomoli, Emanuele |
author_sort | Trombetta, Claudia Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4494249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44942492015-08-31 Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future Trombetta, Claudia Maria Perini, Daniele Mather, Stuart Temperton, Nigel Montomoli, Emanuele Vaccines (Basel) Review Serological techniques commonly used to quantify influenza-specific antibodies include the Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Single Radial Haemolysis (SRH) and Virus Neutralization (VN) assays. HI and SRH are established and reproducible techniques, whereas VN is more demanding. Every new influenza vaccine needs to fulfil the strict criteria issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in order to be licensed. These criteria currently apply exclusively to SRH and HI assays and refer to two different target groups—healthy adults and the elderly, but other vaccine recipient age groups have not been considered (i.e., children). The purpose of this timely review is to highlight the current scenario on correlates of protection concerning influenza vaccines and underline the need to revise the criteria and assays currently in use. In addition to SRH and HI assays, the technical advantages provided by other techniques such as the VN assay, pseudotype-based neutralization assay, neuraminidase and cell-mediated immunity assays need to be considered and regulated via EMA criteria, considering the many significant advantages that they could offer for the development of effective vaccines. MDPI 2014-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4494249/ /pubmed/26344888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2040707 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Trombetta, Claudia Maria Perini, Daniele Mather, Stuart Temperton, Nigel Montomoli, Emanuele Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title | Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_full | Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_fullStr | Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_short | Overview of Serological Techniques for Influenza Vaccine Evaluation: Past, Present and Future |
title_sort | overview of serological techniques for influenza vaccine evaluation: past, present and future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines2040707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trombettaclaudiamaria overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT perinidaniele overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT matherstuart overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT tempertonnigel overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture AT montomoliemanuele overviewofserologicaltechniquesforinfluenzavaccineevaluationpastpresentandfuture |