Cargando…

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Three Cage Layer Housing Systems

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were measured from three different cage layer housing systems. A comparative study was conducted to identify the housing system with the least impact on the environment. The results showed that liquid manure from deep-pit housing systems produces greate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fournel, Sébastien, Pelletier, Frédéric, Godbout, Stéphane, Lagacé, Robert, Feddes, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2010001
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were measured from three different cage layer housing systems. A comparative study was conducted to identify the housing system with the least impact on the environment. The results showed that liquid manure from deep-pit housing systems produces greater emissions of carbon dioxide (CO(2)), methane (CH(4)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) than natural and forced dried manure from belt housing systems. The influencing factors appeared to be the manure removal frequency and the dry matter content of the manure. ABSTRACT: Agriculture accounts for 10 to 12% of the World’s total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Manure management alone is responsible for 13% of GHG emissions from the agricultural sector. During the last decade, Québec’s egg production systems have shifted from deep-pit housing systems to manure belt housing systems. The objective of this study was to measure and compare carbon dioxide (CO(2)), methane (CH(4)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions from three different cage layer housing systems: a deep liquid manure pit and a manure belt with natural or forced air drying. Deep liquid manure pit housing systems consist of “A” frame layer cages located over a closed pit containing the hens’ droppings to which water is added to facilitate removal by pumping. Manure belt techniques imply that manure drops on a belt beneath each row of battery cages where it is either dried naturally or by forced air until it is removed. The experiment was replicated with 360 hens reared into twelve independent bench-scale rooms during eight weeks (19–27 weeks of age). The natural and forced air manure belt systems reduced CO(2) (28.2 and 28.7 kg yr(−1) hen(−1), respectively), CH(4) (25.3 and 27.7 g yr(−1) hen(−1), respectively) and N(2)O (2.60 and 2.48 g yr(−1) hen(−1), respectively) emissions by about 21, 16 and 9% in comparison with the deep-pit technique (36.0 kg CO(2) yr(−1) hen(−1), 31.6 g CH(4) yr(−1) hen(−1) and 2.78 g N(2)O yr(−1) hen(−1)). The shift to manure belt systems needs to be encouraged since this housing system significantly decreases the production of GHG.