Cargando…

Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Greenhouse gas emissions from animal production are substantial contributors to global emissions. Therefore Carbon Footprints (CF) were introduced to compare emissions from various foods of animal origin. The CF for food of animal origin depends on a number of influencing factors suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flachowsky, Gerhard, Kamphues, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2020108
_version_ 1782380070090833920
author Flachowsky, Gerhard
Kamphues, Josef
author_facet Flachowsky, Gerhard
Kamphues, Josef
author_sort Flachowsky, Gerhard
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Greenhouse gas emissions from animal production are substantial contributors to global emissions. Therefore Carbon Footprints (CF) were introduced to compare emissions from various foods of animal origin. The CF for food of animal origin depends on a number of influencing factors such as animal species, type of production, feeding of animals, level of animal performance, system boundaries and output/endpoints of production. Milk and egg yields are more clearly defined animal outputs of production than food from slaughtered animals. Body weight gain, carcass weight gain, meat, edible fractions of carcass or edible protein are measurable outputs of slaughtered animals. The pros and contras of various outcomes under special consideration of edible protein are discussed in this paper. ABSTRACT: There are increasing efforts to determine the origin of greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activities (including food consumption) and to identify, apply and exploit reduction potentials. Low emissions are generally the result of increased efficiency in resource utilization. Considering climate related factors, the emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and laughing gas are summarized to so-called carbon footprints (CF). The CF for food of animal origin such as milk, eggs, meat and fish depend on a number of influencing factors such as animal species, type of production, feeding of animals, animal performance, system boundaries and outputs of production. Milk and egg yields are more clearly defined animal yields or outcomes of production than food from the carcasses of animals. Possible endpoints of growing/slaughter animals are body weight gain, carcass weight gain (warm or cold), meat, edible fractions or edible protein. The production of edible protein of animal origin may be considered as one of the main objectives of animal husbandry in many countries. On the other hand, the efficiency of various lines of production and the CF per product can also be easily compared on the basis of edible protein. The pros and contras of various outputs of animal production under special consideration of edible protein are discussed in the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44943252015-09-30 Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields? Flachowsky, Gerhard Kamphues, Josef Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Greenhouse gas emissions from animal production are substantial contributors to global emissions. Therefore Carbon Footprints (CF) were introduced to compare emissions from various foods of animal origin. The CF for food of animal origin depends on a number of influencing factors such as animal species, type of production, feeding of animals, level of animal performance, system boundaries and output/endpoints of production. Milk and egg yields are more clearly defined animal outputs of production than food from slaughtered animals. Body weight gain, carcass weight gain, meat, edible fractions of carcass or edible protein are measurable outputs of slaughtered animals. The pros and contras of various outcomes under special consideration of edible protein are discussed in this paper. ABSTRACT: There are increasing efforts to determine the origin of greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activities (including food consumption) and to identify, apply and exploit reduction potentials. Low emissions are generally the result of increased efficiency in resource utilization. Considering climate related factors, the emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and laughing gas are summarized to so-called carbon footprints (CF). The CF for food of animal origin such as milk, eggs, meat and fish depend on a number of influencing factors such as animal species, type of production, feeding of animals, animal performance, system boundaries and outputs of production. Milk and egg yields are more clearly defined animal yields or outcomes of production than food from the carcasses of animals. Possible endpoints of growing/slaughter animals are body weight gain, carcass weight gain (warm or cold), meat, edible fractions or edible protein. The production of edible protein of animal origin may be considered as one of the main objectives of animal husbandry in many countries. On the other hand, the efficiency of various lines of production and the CF per product can also be easily compared on the basis of edible protein. The pros and contras of various outputs of animal production under special consideration of edible protein are discussed in the paper. MDPI 2012-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4494325/ /pubmed/26486912 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2020108 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Flachowsky, Gerhard
Kamphues, Josef
Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title_full Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title_fullStr Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title_short Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?
title_sort carbon footprints for food of animal origin: what are the most preferable criteria to measure animal yields?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486912
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2020108
work_keys_str_mv AT flachowskygerhard carbonfootprintsforfoodofanimaloriginwhatarethemostpreferablecriteriatomeasureanimalyields
AT kamphuesjosef carbonfootprintsforfoodofanimaloriginwhatarethemostpreferablecriteriatomeasureanimalyields