Cargando…
A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing
SIMPLE SUMMARY: This is a critique of the British Horseracing Authority’s 2011 report, A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It analyses the way the report uses science and public opinion research to reach conclusions on the animal welfare impact of whip use. Our analysis suggests that som...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5010138 |
_version_ | 1782380072320106496 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Bidda Goodfellow, Jed Yeates, James McGreevy, Paul D. |
author_facet | Jones, Bidda Goodfellow, Jed Yeates, James McGreevy, Paul D. |
author_sort | Jones, Bidda |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: This is a critique of the British Horseracing Authority’s 2011 report, A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It analyses the way the report uses science and public opinion research to reach conclusions on the animal welfare impact of whip use. Our analysis suggests that some of the report’s findings are insufficiently defended by the report and that further independent scientific review is needed to reach definitive conclusions about whip use on racehorse welfare. ABSTRACT: There is increasing controversy about the use of the whip as a performance aid in Thoroughbred horseracing and its impact on horse welfare. This paper offers a critical analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s (BHA) 2011 Report Responsible Regulation: A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It examines the BHA’s process of consultation and use of science and public opinion research through the application of current scientific literature and legal analysis. This analysis suggests that the BHA’s findings on the welfare impact and justification for whip use are insufficiently defended by the report. These findings indicate that the report is an inadequate basis from which to draw any definitive conclusions on the impact of whips on racehorse welfare. Further review is needed, undertaken by an independent scientific body, to advance this debate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4494335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44943352015-09-30 A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing Jones, Bidda Goodfellow, Jed Yeates, James McGreevy, Paul D. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: This is a critique of the British Horseracing Authority’s 2011 report, A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It analyses the way the report uses science and public opinion research to reach conclusions on the animal welfare impact of whip use. Our analysis suggests that some of the report’s findings are insufficiently defended by the report and that further independent scientific review is needed to reach definitive conclusions about whip use on racehorse welfare. ABSTRACT: There is increasing controversy about the use of the whip as a performance aid in Thoroughbred horseracing and its impact on horse welfare. This paper offers a critical analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s (BHA) 2011 Report Responsible Regulation: A Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing. It examines the BHA’s process of consultation and use of science and public opinion research through the application of current scientific literature and legal analysis. This analysis suggests that the BHA’s findings on the welfare impact and justification for whip use are insufficiently defended by the report. These findings indicate that the report is an inadequate basis from which to draw any definitive conclusions on the impact of whips on racehorse welfare. Further review is needed, undertaken by an independent scientific body, to advance this debate. MDPI 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4494335/ /pubmed/26479143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5010138 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Jones, Bidda Goodfellow, Jed Yeates, James McGreevy, Paul D. A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title | A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title_full | A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title_fullStr | A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title_short | A Critical Analysis of the British Horseracing Authority’s Review of the Use of the Whip in Horseracing |
title_sort | critical analysis of the british horseracing authority’s review of the use of the whip in horseracing |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5010138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesbidda acriticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT goodfellowjed acriticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT yeatesjames acriticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT mcgreevypauld acriticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT jonesbidda criticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT goodfellowjed criticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT yeatesjames criticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing AT mcgreevypauld criticalanalysisofthebritishhorseracingauthoritysreviewoftheuseofthewhipinhorseracing |