Cargando…

Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sridhar, Saranya, Brokstad, Karl A., Cox, Rebecca J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26343192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines3020373
_version_ 1782380074328129536
author Sridhar, Saranya
Brokstad, Karl A.
Cox, Rebecca J.
author_facet Sridhar, Saranya
Brokstad, Karl A.
Cox, Rebecca J.
author_sort Sridhar, Saranya
collection PubMed
description Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young children, people with underlying disease and the elderly, along with occupational groups such a healthcare workers and farm workers. There are two main types of vaccines available: the parenteral inactivated influenza vaccine and the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine. The inactivated vaccines are licensed from 6 months of age and have been used for more than 50 years with a good safety profile. Inactivated vaccines are standardized according to the presence of the viral major surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin and protection is mediated by the induction of vaccine strain specific antibody responses. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccines are licensed in Europe for children from 2–17 years of age and provide a multifaceted immune response with local and systemic antibody and T cell responses but with no clear correlate of protection. Here we discuss the immunological immune responses elicited by the two vaccines and discuss future work to better define correlates of protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4494344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44943442015-08-31 Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines Sridhar, Saranya Brokstad, Karl A. Cox, Rebecca J. Vaccines (Basel) Review Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young children, people with underlying disease and the elderly, along with occupational groups such a healthcare workers and farm workers. There are two main types of vaccines available: the parenteral inactivated influenza vaccine and the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine. The inactivated vaccines are licensed from 6 months of age and have been used for more than 50 years with a good safety profile. Inactivated vaccines are standardized according to the presence of the viral major surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin and protection is mediated by the induction of vaccine strain specific antibody responses. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccines are licensed in Europe for children from 2–17 years of age and provide a multifaceted immune response with local and systemic antibody and T cell responses but with no clear correlate of protection. Here we discuss the immunological immune responses elicited by the two vaccines and discuss future work to better define correlates of protection. MDPI 2015-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4494344/ /pubmed/26343192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines3020373 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sridhar, Saranya
Brokstad, Karl A.
Cox, Rebecca J.
Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title_full Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title_fullStr Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title_full_unstemmed Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title_short Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines
title_sort influenza vaccination strategies: comparing inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26343192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines3020373
work_keys_str_mv AT sridharsaranya influenzavaccinationstrategiescomparinginactivatedandliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccines
AT brokstadkarla influenzavaccinationstrategiescomparinginactivatedandliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccines
AT coxrebeccaj influenzavaccinationstrategiescomparinginactivatedandliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccines